Quote:
Originally posted by omuh
...
I'm pretty sure I recall you saying otherwise but I might be wrong as I usually read the thread pretty quickly. So my bad if I'm wrong but lets say that's not what I understood from all your previous posts on the matter.
I said it about Crimea, not the uprisings in the East.
Quote:
Originally posted by Omuh
Not necessarily many more as it's pretty common to have a vocal minority with the rest thinking otherwise or with no opinion.
I agree, the minority is always more vocal, but that doesn't mean the majority doesn't have an opinion. If there were a vote, and in the vote there was 1 question with a yes or no answer, such as "Should Ukraine rejoin Russia - Yes or No". You would have minorities for both sides being very vocal; the yes side would hold rallies and so would the no side, and the majority of the population would watch the rallies from their couch. However....they will vote.
Quote:
Originally posted by Omuh
That's a weird projection especially coming from a journalist
That would be assessing that those 2000/1500 people are representative of the rest of the population which is most likely not the case. If the total population was 350 000 person (it's just a random number), it doesn't mean 200 000 would be for unity and 150 000 for separation. It just means that 2000+1500 are motivated enough to go on the street and that's it.
You can't make global projections based on protests and random street interviews (even though that's what lots of media tends to do...)
As I started to get into in my above comment, I agree that its not an entirely scientific way of estimating the number of supporters on EITHER side of a particular cause, but it could be somewhat indicative of levels of support. As I mentioned, the majority of the population will do nothing until it comes time to vote, and even then, you won't get 100% turn out at the polls. However, just because those people aren't joining rallies and protests doesn't mean that they don't have an opinion. It stands to reason that each side of a heated dispute would have a similar percentage of people people motivated enough to go out and protest and rally, and both sides will have supporters that are staying at home, but when /if it comes time to vote, they will support their cause. I will conceded that perhaps the Unity supporters are maybe not quite as motivated to join rallies yet, as there is some fear, and also some belief that it doesn't mater because they're the majority so rallies are not needed, but I believe thats changing as the threat of separation gets more serious.
Quote:
Originally posted by Omuh
That was my point when talking about a reaction to the previous pro-european riots and/or Russia's interventions, it could be just that.
Perhaps, if the problem was really there, they would have talked about it before when the government was pretty neutral towards europe/russia.
They maybe weren't talking separation, but the Ukrainian people have been talking about how poor their economic situation is for quite some time. As they see change in one part of the country, it gives them hope/strength to demand change in their part of the country.