In some of the U.S. states I believe 16 is still legal.
The problem is that the girl can get pregnant (I know, Mr. States-The-Obvious). So, it's a little unfair that she can't have a relationship without the stigma related to her situation like the male can. However, a forty year old should have no business with a younger person anyway.
I'm 21 years old and I can't stand to hear the shit that comes out of a sixteen year olds mouth. They're just so immature and ignorant. Which I'll have to say there are a few who aren't so hard to literally talk to, but this has been my experience.
I really didn't think there could be such a gap between 16 and 21, but there is. However, making a law that restrains a person's freedom to choose who their sexual partner is closely borders enforcing a national religion. In both situations you're forcing a set of beliefs on someone who has been stripped of their right to choose.
The United States is becoming so hypocritical these days, and I'm afraid it's only going to get worse. I am seeing us speak the same beliefs in freedom while our representatives keep taking them away through backdoor politics, half-truths, conveniently worded laws, and not to mention the waves of misinformation being spewed during speeches.
It's not Democrats...
It's not Republicans...
It's politicians and ourselves. We are alllowing our own governments to increase THEIR pay while our minimum wage STAGNATES.
Back to the Consentual or Rape debate, everything can't be BLACK or WHITE. This isn't a cartoon from fifties. Some laws need to be taken out of the judicial system to allow lawyers, police officers, law makers, and the PEOPLE who the government is supposed to be FOR in the first place, do their jobs. Too much emphasis is being put on a single individual's shoulders when they are the ones who examine the person. The jury should be able to submit questions and there should be more than one judge in the first place. Didn't history teach us anything about giving too much power to one individual?
Let the LOVERS show their love to the court or let the court prove that it wasn't consentual and one took advantage of the other.
If we feel an official is not fit to run an office IT'S OUR JOB to impeach or otherwise FIRE them (we pay them after all).
Sorry guys, I didn't mean to get so involved in this. It just sort of took off. But the U.S. is "lawing" themselves to their own demise.
The problem is that the girl can get pregnant (I know, Mr. States-The-Obvious). So, it's a little unfair that she can't have a relationship without the stigma related to her situation like the male can. However, a forty year old should have no business with a younger person anyway.
I'm 21 years old and I can't stand to hear the shit that comes out of a sixteen year olds mouth. They're just so immature and ignorant. Which I'll have to say there are a few who aren't so hard to literally talk to, but this has been my experience.
I really didn't think there could be such a gap between 16 and 21, but there is. However, making a law that restrains a person's freedom to choose who their sexual partner is closely borders enforcing a national religion. In both situations you're forcing a set of beliefs on someone who has been stripped of their right to choose.
The United States is becoming so hypocritical these days, and I'm afraid it's only going to get worse. I am seeing us speak the same beliefs in freedom while our representatives keep taking them away through backdoor politics, half-truths, conveniently worded laws, and not to mention the waves of misinformation being spewed during speeches.
It's not Democrats...
It's not Republicans...
It's politicians and ourselves. We are alllowing our own governments to increase THEIR pay while our minimum wage STAGNATES.
Back to the Consentual or Rape debate, everything can't be BLACK or WHITE. This isn't a cartoon from fifties. Some laws need to be taken out of the judicial system to allow lawyers, police officers, law makers, and the PEOPLE who the government is supposed to be FOR in the first place, do their jobs. Too much emphasis is being put on a single individual's shoulders when they are the ones who examine the person. The jury should be able to submit questions and there should be more than one judge in the first place. Didn't history teach us anything about giving too much power to one individual?
Let the LOVERS show their love to the court or let the court prove that it wasn't consentual and one took advantage of the other.
If we feel an official is not fit to run an office IT'S OUR JOB to impeach or otherwise FIRE them (we pay them after all).
Sorry guys, I didn't mean to get so involved in this. It just sort of took off. But the U.S. is "lawing" themselves to their own demise.
* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago
