New rule for pics?

So as it's been discussed here it seems like some members and mods don't think that some pictures that can't be considered porn content or sexy but more facebook/friend/family content shouldn't be displayed on a porn site even though they respect all rules. And I agree with that.

So I was thinking about a simple, objective rule, to deny this kid of pics. It obviously only affect fully dressed pics. So for a fully dressed picture to be accepted it would have to show at least one of the following: cleavage, nipples (through tight or wet clothes), ass (through tights clothes), full legs (either bare legs or with stockings/pantyhoses/tight pants), cameltoe.
Pictures that wouldn't be accepted anymore would then be: fully dressed showing none of those (example here) or close-up face selfshots (example). We would use the "other" reason to deny them.

This is I think the only objective way to keep those pics out of the galleries. We don't want to start judging pics based on their attractiveness since it would be impossible to find an objective rule for that.

Yes I agree except for really beautiful clothed ladies that are not models. Just the normal everyday gal that you will never see again and took your breath away.

I would say your
2nd example I would accept.

1st example what if the nipples. are showing?

Quote:

Originally posted by Goldseeker

1st example what if the nipples. are showing?

If the nipples are poking, then it would be good, as said in the "new rule" suggestion

Quote:

Originally posted by Notech_The_Abbot

I would say your
2nd example I would accept.

We either need to have an objective rule or no rule. We can't have a rule that say "if the girl is beautiful enough, we accept". That's purely subjective and impossible to moderate consistently.
The only subjective rule we have is the under-age one but that's because we can't go without.
In my opinion, a picture of a non nude girl with nothing suggestive shouldn't be displayed on a porn website, regardless of her attractiveness.

When will new rules be posted if it's going to change?

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

...
If the nipples are poking, then it would be good, as said in the "new rule" suggestion

...


We either need to have an objective rule or no rule. We can't have a rule that say "if the girl is beautiful enough, we accept". That's purely subjective and impossible to moderate consistently.
The only subjective rule we have is the under-age one but that's because we can't go without.
In my opinion, a picture of a non nude girl with nothing suggestive shouldn't be displayed on a porn website, regardless of her attractiveness.

I get what you are saying and you have my vote to do the change.

Quote:

Originally posted by Goldseeker

When will new rules be posted if it's going to change?

I'm waiting for mods to be able to give their opinion and vote.
We have 5 current votes for 10-15 pic mods, so...

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

...
I'm waiting for mods to be able to give their opinion and vote.
We have 5 current votes for 10-15 pic mods, so...

You can expect 2 more , the rest is not very active....

Quote:

Originally posted by eightball88

...

You can expect 2 more , the rest is not very active....

I know...

Also, you can add "cameltoe" to the list of objective things that would get a pic accepted (I edited the main post).

I have mixed feelings, although I definitely support changing the criteria. I think there are too many pics that are just boring. I don't mind the attractive girl non nude shot once in a while, but it seems we have too many where I just have to wonder what the point of it was.

I picked an answer, but don't really care all that much, to be honest.

If members don't want to see ladies that aren't naked, okay, but I thought that's what the category listings and tags were for; so that you could narrow down your search/viewing to whatever kind of pictures you wanted to see?

Hey, i just love candid shots, any of them..... there is a rating scale for every one to critisize or not. I don't personallly like bondage and, i don't thing should be here any of them, for example, there are a few people that can see them and less fewer that like them and rate them like over 5. I thing the answer is at the rating scale if you could have some data of them. if people like them keep them, if not just don't. But do that for all of pics.
....second thoughs... Is everybody really rating?.... Damn!

Quote:

Originally posted by EricLindros

I picked an answer, but don't really care all that much, to be honest.

If members don't want to see ladies that aren't naked, okay, but I thought that's what the category listings and tags were for; so that you could narrow down your search/viewing to whatever kind of pictures you wanted to see?

Well I think the general complaint I've seen isn't about all non-nude pics but more about "boring" pics (as said by kylecook) or pics that people feel don't have anything to do on a porn site.
What I understand here is that while some pictures have some objective sex-appeals, others don't and when viewing them you have the feeling your are browsing a family album or a facebook profile. Those are often not very interesting (even though we can always find something attractive or sexy on a picture that is not intended to be that). I'm also pretty sure, those women would be pretty surprised (if not more) to see that their friend/family pics landed on a porn website.

Quote:

Originally posted by analog2604

Hey, i just love candid shots, any of them..... there is a rating scale for every one to critisize or not. I don't personallly like bondage and, i don't thing should be here any of them, for example, there are a few people that can see them and less fewer that like them and rate them like over 5. I thing the answer is at the rating scale if you could have some data of them. if people like them keep them, if not just don't. But do that for all of pics.
....second thoughs... Is everybody really rating?.... Damn!

I get your point and I like candid shots too but to me it has to have something we can identify as "sexy" on it for it to be interesting. If not, well we can just take random pictures on the street and upload them all here...

As for the different categories, I do agree that people can view the content they want (and skip the one they don't want) with categories and tags, but it's more about what belongs to a porn site and what doesn't. It could be subjective but this is why I try to bring a rule that would have objective criteria to decide that.

I've been M.I.A. from modding for a bit. As I explained to omuh when he first offered me the gig, I'm just too busy at work during the summer months but I try to knock out a bunch in the winter months. But yeah, I'm all for the new rule. A cute girl in a tight dress or low cut blouse should be cool but just some random photo of a woman with a pair of jeans and a t shirt is pointless here, regardless of attractiveness.

I've been against the whole Non-Nude thing since the beginning, if I wanted to see clothed women, I would just step outside. The fact that we have members uploading family, friends, and party albums to our queue is baffling to me. We are a porn-site, not a damn backup solution to Facebook and Instagram. It is bad enough they upload filtered garbage all day long.

again, if we check out non nude and bondage (for example) picture’s statistics, we can see that there are more people rating at non nude pics instead of bondage and also, there are better average rating at NN than BG. I suppose that this is a business porn site and numbers mutter too. So, I suppose that we will prefer NN….?
There are almost 300000 NN pics in here that people (customers) uploaded as they wanted to. This number should tell us something….

Quote:

Originally posted by analog2604

again, if we check out non nude and bondage (for example) picture’s statistics, we can see that there are more people rating at non nude pics instead of bondage and also, there are better average rating at NN than BG. I suppose that this is a business porn site and numbers mutter too. So, I suppose that we will prefer NN….?
There are almost 300000 NN pics in here that people (customers) uploaded as they wanted to. This number should tell us something….

The bondage category is a premium user only one, so that's why way less people watched/rated them.
Also, the aim of this rule isn't to remove ALL non-nude pics, but only the ones that have nothing to do on a porn website.

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

...
The bondage category is a premium user only one, so that's why way less people watched/rated them.
Also, the aim of this rule isn't to remove ALL non-nude pics, but only the ones that have nothing to do on a porn website.

it was just an example.... you get my idea. i thing that that it is about if people like them or not!

I had a long weekend but I am back now.. I think that we should try this.. go for it..