New rule for pics?

I have mixed feelings about this. On one hand it's pretty obvious (to me) which non-nude pics should be rejected
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/show/2127310
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/show/2126764

On the other hand under the proposed new rule this shot(s) would be rejected and the follow shot(s) would be less interesting.
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/show/2048460
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/show/2048344
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/show/2124675
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/show/2124673

Then you have shots that are mislabeled. Non-nude vs lingerie

https://whatboyswant.com/babes/show/2108782
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/show/2124540

Given the above, reluctantly, very reluctantly, I vote 'Don't change'.

Maybe it's me but I find the photos of random women out in public to be a bit creepy. Not the ones they're posing for but the ones that are obviously being taken while they're not looking.

Quote:

Then you have shots that are mislabeled. Non-nude vs lingerie

I don't see what's the issue here? Those wouldn't be rejected by the new rule, especially since they are showing some lingerie (they could even be edited to be put on the lingerie section).

Also not sure how a lingerie/naked shot gets less interesting if we're not able to see a fully dressed picture first? But maybe that's because I'm not really into this "clothes/unclothed" comparison shots.
Very often when there is a series of pics of the same woman in different states of clothing, there will be like one or two pics that won't fit while all the rest will be ok so it's not much lost.

... As we can see, there are a lot of deferent opinions and, this is why I thing, there should be no changes at all. Some people want something else than other people. Choice is something strong. If you like it, check it out. If you don’t, move on…… If we think as porn site, there should be no cars either, or general forum, or computer forum etc……..

Quote:

Originally posted by analog2604

... As we can see, there are a lot of deferent opinions and, this is why I thing, there should be no changes at all. Some people want something else than other people. Choice is something strong. If you like it, check it out. If you don’t, move on…… If we think as porn site, there should be no cars either, or general forum, or computer forum etc……..

Except cars are in the car categories, computer stuff in the their own form section etc. and the "babe" section is supposed to be a sexy/porn section not a family/friend/facebook pics sharing section.

Of course some people are going to disagree with any rule or any choice since we can't please everyone. Hell, we could ask members/mods if pissing pics should be allowed and we would also have disagreements. But there is a point where we have to take a decision and this is what I'm trying to do with the poll, this thread, and what I saw in general on the site.

Yeah, we will never get complete agreement on anything. It's not necessarily a bad thing - just the way it's always going to go.

I still feel like we would be better served if the rule was changed so that we could reject pictures that currently fit the rules, but are just so boring that it's difficult to see how someone would get the appeal in it. I would completely agree with Kanzen's take on not allowing the non-nude stuff entirely, but I think there is a sizable segment of the user base that likes NN, and like EL says, users can choose to look at that content or not with the categories being split up the way they are.

But if wanted to see an average looking woman fully dressed in loose fitting clothing, I could just look at pretty much any public space I've ever been in. I view it more as quality control than anything else.

Quote:

Originally posted by kylecook

Yeah, we will never get complete agreement on anything. It's not necessarily a bad thing - just the way it's always going to go.

I still feel like we would be better served if the rule was changed so that we could reject pictures that currently fit the rules, but are just so boring that it's difficult to see how someone would get the appeal in it. I would completely agree with Kanzen's take on not allowing the non-nude stuff entirely, but I think there is a sizable segment of the user base that likes NN, and like EL says, users can choose to look at that content or not with the categories being split up the way they are.

But if wanted to see an average looking woman fully dressed in loose fitting clothing, I could just look at pretty much any public space I've ever been in. I view it more as quality control than anything else.

This is exactly what I'm suggesting with the new rule. We just can't go with "if you find the picture boring, reject it" because that's also purely subjective and it would be hard to explain it to members. Hence the different objective criteria to make it easy (even if that doesn't filter out ALL the "boring" ones or filter out a few not boring one, that seem to be a good compromise).

I

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

...
This is exactly what I'm suggesting with the new rule. We just can't go with "if you find the picture boring, reject it" because that's also purely subjective and it would be hard to explain it to members. Hence the different objective criteria to make it easy (even if that doesn't filter out ALL the "boring" ones or filter out a few not boring one, that seem to be a good compromise).

I get it. I don't mind a bit of subjectivity with it, especially if they are getting rejected as "other" and don't impact the uploading score. But I agree that taking subjectivity out as much as possible is preferable.

Even though I like seeing sexy girls full dressed I agree with the rule. I guess that many of those candid shots apply for ass (through tights clothes), full legs (either bare legs or with stockings/pantyhoses/tight pants).

Question... if a pictures is part of a set where is known that the girls shows more (full nudity i.e.), should this one be rejected too?

so, are we going to have a new one or not? If yes, which one?

Quote:

Originally posted by cheap2

Question... if a pictures is part of a set where is known that the girls shows more (full nudity i.e.), should this one be rejected too?

That's a good question and that joins what AJ was saying about pics from a series with some being naked/lingerie and others being fully clothes with not much interesting. It's sometimes hard to tell if a pic is part of a series when moderating since they come up in random orders but I guess it wouldn't be too bad if a few ones being part of a series are accepted (if you are sure they are part of one with nudes).
I'd delete them though since it's not very interesting anyway.

Quote:

Originally posted by analog2604

so, are we going to have a new one or not? If yes, which one?

I'll probably add the rule soon since the majority of mods are in favour of it. I'll post in here when it's done

Alright so I've added the rule to the guidelines. You can now reject pics that do not fit with it using the "other" reason:

Quote:

9. To limit the number of "non-porn/sexy" pictures uploaded to the galleries, non-nude pictures must show at least one of the following: cleavage, nipples (through tight or wet clothes), ass (through tights clothes), full legs (either bare legs or with stockings/pantyhoses/tight pants), cameltoe

If you have any question, feel free to ask

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

Alright so I've added the rule to the guidelines. You can now reject pics that do not fit with it using the "other" reason:

...

If you have any question, feel free to ask

What constitutes "full" legs? Short shorts?

No amputees, you weirdo.

Quote:

Originally posted by kylecook

...

What constitutes "full" legs? Short shorts?

I'd say if you can see above the knee + half the thighs, that's good enough. So basically short shorts, miniskirt and tights pants.

what about somebody posting a picture that is a better version of the same pic already existing on the site (bigger , not cropped) , part of the non-nude section and not fitting the new rules ? We replace the existing pic by the new one , we delete the new one and leave the existing or we delete both ?

Quote:

Originally posted by Kanzen

No amputees, you weirdo.

If I find nugget porn that otherwise complies with the rules, I'm approving it. It's the holy grail of the porn world.

Quote:

Originally posted by eightball88

what about somebody posting a picture that is a better version of the same pic already existing on the site (bigger , not cropped) , part of the non-nude section and not fitting the new rules ? We replace the existing pic by the new one , we delete the new one and leave the existing or we delete both ?

Good question ^^
I'd go for delete both.

I like nuns...

Quote:

Originally posted by DEMO

I like nuns...

Interesting. You should check out "Nude Nuns with Big Guns." http://m.imdb.com/title/tt1352388/