Quote:
Originally posted by jenngurl23
A common misunderstanding with this movie is that "Edward" is a bad actor, he actually isn't that terrible so much as in the first movie he didn't like the way his character was being portrayed so didn't even really try, and the DIRECTING isn't good. The actors are in a major film, they know how to act, they just have to do as they are told by the director and script and they can only improve on that so much. "Bella" is a so-so actor with near to no emotion besides gasping and screaming in any of her movies but in this particular series I can't tell how much of that is her and how much is the director and script.
Are you suggesting that just because they're in a major movie they can act? That Edward guy acts like he's in a soap opera the whole time. Way over acted and way too much cheesiness on his part. I thought Kirsten Stewart did a good job.
So he didn't like how his character was being portrayed so he didn't try? That just makes me like him even less. He was nobody before this movie what gave him the arrogance to not try in his first major starring role or even have an opinion about how his character was being portrayed with absolutely no real experience? I know you were trying to defend him with that post but you just made him look like a 10 times bigger jackass then I thought he was when I thought he was only a "bad actor". Now not only do I think he's a bad actor I also think he's an arrogant over opinionated bad actor.
I actually thought Kristen Stewart played the role well but she's the only one.
Quote:
Originally posted by RumDum
Also Also, Vanessa Hudgens is way hotter than the Bella chic.
Not even close. Kristen Stewart has the potential to be GORGEOUS. She just dresses down and looks like homeless shit when she dresses herself. When stylists fix her up the girl can compete against anybody in Hollywood. Hudgens on the other hand just has a "cute" kinda thing about her but it doesn't hold up against real beauty.
* This post has been modified
: 14 years ago