@ Paradise
I'm not gonna quote your whole post, because I do agree with most of what you said regarding money and politics, but I think the quoted bit below is where we really differ.
I guess my feeling is that the underlying environment isn't preventing unions from making sure their members have safe working conditions, make a fair wage, get a fair amount of time off, and receive benefits inline with the average worker. I don't see laws in place the prevent the union from doing their job. Maybe there is...I just don't see it. As I mentioned in my comments to EL above, if there were laws that prevent the union from doing their job, that prevented them from negotiating the highest pay possible for their members, then I would totally support unions being politically active, but I don't see any examples of that happening.
I'm not gonna quote your whole post, because I do agree with most of what you said regarding money and politics, but I think the quoted bit below is where we really differ.
Quote:
Originally posted by paradiseYou stated that unions' "only objectives should be to make sure their members have safe working conditions, make a fair wage, get a fair amount of time off, and receive benefits inline with the average worker."
I ask you then, how do you believe this can happen without the underlying environment allowing for that? That's the part of unions backing candidates they believe will help them be able to do EXACTLY what you state is the only objectives unions should have! You have to have the matrix and bedrock that allows for that. If you aren't cogent of what is going on that controls the entire environment within which anything can happen, you won't understand how and why it all works.
I guess my feeling is that the underlying environment isn't preventing unions from making sure their members have safe working conditions, make a fair wage, get a fair amount of time off, and receive benefits inline with the average worker. I don't see laws in place the prevent the union from doing their job. Maybe there is...I just don't see it. As I mentioned in my comments to EL above, if there were laws that prevent the union from doing their job, that prevented them from negotiating the highest pay possible for their members, then I would totally support unions being politically active, but I don't see any examples of that happening.