Move
* This post has been modified
: 18 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Z-BO
I agree, you get what you deserve.......usually
Quote:
I didn't graduate college, I don't kiss ass and I make $90 an hour.
Quote:
Originally posted by Punnani
Opps sorry, this is America... I will Just go back to the UK.
Quote:
Originally posted by Jeff613a good job being defined as one where you make at least $16 an hour and have some benefits to speak of.
Quote:
Originally posted by LS650
[reply=Jeff613]a good job being defined as one where you make at least $16 an hour and have some benefits to speak of.
Quote:
Originally posted by LS650
[reply=Jeff613]a good job being defined as one where you make at least $16 an hour and have some benefits to speak of.
Quote:
Originally posted by Dionysus32
Hey spiny, great name!
Actually, I do teach - 5 section per semester, about 160 students in all. I grade somewhere in the neighborhood of 700 - 100 papers per semester. Though I am only on campus about 6 hours per day, I regularly work 3 - 6 hours at home every day, including weekends, during the semester just to keep up.
I realize I got sidetracked into a liberal anti-capitalist rant - sorry, my apologies. At my school we have been losing positions for years. The dominant trend in higher education these days is to replace tenured faculty with adjuncts, individuals with similar degrees, but who do not carry a full course load and therefore are not paid at the same rate. Instead of being paid at a semester rate, adjuncts get paid per class (in my area of the U.S., that's about $2500 per class per semester) and they are not entitled to health or retirement benefits. For colleges, obviously, this makes sense - adjuncts are essentially temps, and they are much cheaper than full-time faculty. For colleges, the adjunct iss is all about money. However, for faculty the issue is not money; it is that adjuncts have little loyalty to the institution or to the students, since the institution pays them little loyalty. So our argument is that the continuing process of losing full-time positions for a horde of adjuncts dilutes and undermines our service to our students.
In 1995 at my college our full-time to adjunct ratio was about 70-30%. Today it is about 40-60%. Unionization has not been able yet to stop this decline, but it is trying very hard to do so. Locally and nationally, education unions have taken the position that the continuing failure to fully staff universities and colleges will result in a poorer education for the millions of students who desperately need a quality education to compete in the post-modern world.
In addition, the current administration of our college has attempted to impose new, harsher working conditions over the past five years - longer semesters, higher student class counts, more duties in addition to our teaching loads, committee work and outside activities. I'm happy to say that the union that I head has stopped some of these actions and is actively seeking to reverse others with the appropriate state agencies. Morale is very poor these days, this on a campus where nearly everyone ten years ago was very happy to come to work each day. Good people are retiring or quitting early.
Education is not a business on the same model as any other production or service industry and cannot be run or measured in the same manner. The work that we perform may have impacts that last or only come to fruition long after a student's time in college is long over. I have to take care each day to encourage and not denigrate my students that what I say and do can have last impacts on the lives and the psyches of my students.
All in all, I still have the most wonderful job imaginable. What I really want is the same job I had ten years ago, before administrators using outdated business models who hate faculty for their supposed "easy life" invaded my campus and turned it upside down.