Quote:
Originally posted by rocknthefreewor
[reply=flumretard]
and i still think the whole american thing of separation of church and state is bs. the followings based on christ are obviously connected to the american govt in many ways, if bush being a big god and jesus promoter during the press conferences isnt enough.
You don't understand the American concept. There is no seperation of church and state and never has been. The Constitution blocks the US government from setting up an official church as England had at the time of the revolution. The seperation mistake comes in from a letter written by Thomas Jefferson many years later describing that article of the Constitution as a wall of seperation between church and state. It is not codified into law and never will be.
[/reply]
[Note: My response concerns the American Constitution, apoligies if it doesn't transfer to your country]
You are correct in saying there is no official 'separation of church and state'. There is only the letter written by Jefferson in 1801 to the Danbury Baptists.
http://www.loc.gov/loc/lcib/9806/danpre.html
The problem I have with modern 'separation with church and state' is that it has been changed into a PC war. What people don't seem to realize is that they don't have a constitutional right to not be offended. If you're offended, too bad. The original motive of 'separation of church and state' was to remove things from the government that violated the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses of the constitution. Saying 'under God' was ruled unconstitutional because it promoted religion over the non-religious. It was only added to the Pledge of Alligence in 1954 by Eisenhower when we were fighting athiest communists. As America moves to a more Secular nation, people start to take the issue way too far and try to remove everything that 'offends' them. Saying that people cannot put up a Menorah while others can put up a Christmas Tree is BS. Everyone should be able to celebrate their beliefs, even if it offends people and doesn't interfere with the welfare of the community. But if you grant religious equality to everyone in public displays, you have to allow everyone. Even people like Satanists.
There needs to be written limits that are designed by everyone involved. Christians, Muslims, Buddists, Satanists, Athiests, Prodestants, Catholics, Mormons, whatever is in the community. Even though it sounds like a big trouble, you have to have bounds defined before you criticize what they are doing. If you put up a Nativity display, you cannot make someone take down their sacrificial altar just because it represents something you don't agree with.
The First Amendment deals with the rights most basic to the individual, and they are defined to protect all people, particulary minorities, since the majority has no problem securing their rights and beliefs. The majority has every right to keep what they believe but they cannot encroach on others' rights.
I have no problem with Merry Christmas in public speak, public resturants, and public documents, but when it comes to issues of institutions controlled by the state and federal government, non-denomination is what the Constitution requires.
* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago