No.
I'm not an organ donor because I don't like the system they have set up. I'd donate if they paid the donor, or even the donor's family after death, for the organs. But as it is now, the organ donor gives everything up for free, and then the doctors and nurses and techs get paid to transplant them, the hospitals get paid for the operating rooms, the organ transport teams get paid for transporting the organs quickly, etc. Everyone gets paid, except the person who actually made the real sacrifice. It's nonsense. If people are going to get paid because of my organs, my family sure as shit better be getting in on that action.
Plus, if you paid for organs you'd get a lot more donors, especially for non-vital things, like lobes of your liver (which can regenerate).
I also have the same opinion on blood donation.
The donors don't get paid for that stuff, but you do get paid for plasma donation, semen donation, and medical testing. It's weird how random and nonsensical the whole system is.
So, no, not until they start paying the donors.
Fair enough..how much money to your family would it take before you considered being an organ donor?
Not a lot. A few grand for larger organs. Like $50-100 for a pint of blood.
The organs could pay for funeral expenses or whatever for people who've died.
I've been listed as an organ donor for as long as I can remember.
I mean, c'mon, once I'm dead, they won't be much good to me anyway.
Can't say anyone's really gonna be thrilled when they get my liver or kidneys though, been filtering an ungodly amount of alcohol for way too long.
I agree with Lindros regarding the donations that can be done while still alive, up the ante and put a dollar amount on it and you'd probably have a lot more donations happening.
Currently, I'm a somewhat regular blood donor. I've got that universal blood type that can go to anybody. And since I don't ever donate money to anything charitable, I figure this is my way of helping out.
The real issue for me is how the definition of death has been redefined to feed the transplant industry, which is (literally) rapacious in it's hunger for raw material.
If you want to be an organ donor, you MUST define the conditions under which your death is defined so that your heirs or family can fend off the doctors who want to pull your plug.
Sounds simple, this idea of death or clinical death or brain dead, or.... But it is absolutely not, as doctors now have such flexible definitions ( yes that is plural) of death that they are waiting for ya. This is a business after all, and it is quite competitive.
It is not about saving life and idealism my friends. It is all about the money and I have recently changed my status with the DMV ( here in California where we have our donor status on our drivers license) so for the dime being....I am not in the program.
[Deleted] 13 years ago
Mandatory - No.
Voluntarily - Yes. I'm an organ donor on my drivers license as are my family to help others.
Institutionally/governmental - It already is via abortion and embryonic stem cell lines.
Abortion = infanticide = reduced human value=people are meat=reduced value of life
And I'm not even getting into the contemporary quasi-eugenics issue here...
[Deleted] 13 years ago
I'd feel a little rustled if someone else was allowed to make a decision like that. The current laws are ok although people should be allowed to sell their own organs if they want, and if a body has no license or next of kin then use it. I'm a donor, take whatevers worth keeping and burn the rest. It'd be cool to still have pieces of me getting around doing marvelous things in various places after my death. If someone's making money out of it though, I want my death expenses paid.
ThreadKiller 13 years ago
My free spirit would hate to see it mandatory.
I am a voluntary organ and I freely give what some needful person can use.
I am happy to donate my organs, my Mum really doesn't like the idea but she understands my feelings. When I'm gone I won't have any use for them so they may as well have them. The only things they can't take are my eyes, as that was something i promised my Mum. My organs could help 5 or more people have a better life.
Should it be mandatory? Yes, people should have to opt out. Instead of carrying a donor card, carry a refusal card. Not everyone's organs can be used. An alcoholics Liver wouldn't be much good or a heavy smokers Lungs but maybe other organs could be used.
I may have upset some people with my opinion but that's the way I feel.
@ Rower41,
good comments I pretty much agree straight across the board.
I do like the idea of making people opt-out.
I have no issue with people selling a regenerative organ, but I don't like the pay-after-death idea. Suicide rates, I do not believe, will be much affected, but the murder rate could skyrocket. Just something I don't like about knowing a family member could cut my brake lines to get out a financial jamb.
Why is no one mentioning stem cell research to avoid this shit ?