american muscle car owners dont look at this site

it will make you almost cry
www.carsinbarns.com
here is one example

that isnt muscle anyways

WE can rebuild her, better, faster, stronger....

http://www.musclecarrestorations.com/70bird/70bird.html

thats more it

thats still ugly imo

Don't be poopoo da Mopars

http://www.scfyb.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=3028&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=15&sid=42769f2c91662d223ab5e3e25fb9527a

Yes Hemi thats my car. Thanks for showing everyone a really fast Camaro! Now I dont have to post the pic.

What, a Superbird is not a Muscle Car?

You new to this?

Quote:

What, a Superbird is not a Muscle Car?
You new to this?

lol

ok, (laughs)

That is the best response I have ever seen.

kudos to joe_dirt.

If you want to consider it a Muscle car, then sure. That big ass boat isnt fast though.

http://www.allpar.com/model/superbird.html

http://www.fast-autos.net/plymouth/plymouthsuperbird.html

I'm sorry to report, but once again LT1pnyklr, you know not of what you speak.

140-160 mph.

What do you consider "fast enough"?

Mickster, just cause you drive a honda and think thats "fast" dont say I dont know what Im talking about. When Im talking about something being fast, Im not talking about top end. So what it can do a 140mph. Who the fuk cares about top end. I only care about who can get there first. Yeah the stat says it ran 14.2 in the 1/4 mile. But thats a car with 390 hp! A stock LT1 camaro with only 285 hp does it faster than that. I also realize the difference in technology from then and now, but still that isnt to impressive to me. Its like the 03 supercharged Mustang Cobras. They have 390 hp stock with a damn blower. They arent much faster than a new LS1 Camaro that only has 305 hp. WTF???? I personally would rather have a car that ran consistant 10's or 11's in the 1/4. To me that would be fast enough for a "daily driver".

I don't drive a Honda...I drive a 1999 Nissan Maxima, but it's a company car.

And I have owned a 1971 Roadrunner, a 1972 Corvette, and a 1988 Dodge Daytona.

i think you cant compare a superbird from the early seventies
to a modern camaro with a LT 1 inside
i mean there has changed a lot in building cars and the technick
we talk about 30 years of difference
i am sure your camaro is faster but its not a muscle car
i am sorry but muscle cars are from the late sixties or early seventies
and certainly not from the milenium

well i like to say also that i have experiance with cars to tune so i say already that you can spare your comment
i build a pro/street el camino with a 454 LS6 engine with a fogger nitrous oxite system on it
with a total horse power of 750 hp
even its street legal
it will blast the doors out of your LT1 camaro

Well if it really had 750hp Metalux, it should beat my 550+hp Camaro. Doesnt take rocket science to see the difference in the numbers there asshole. If you really wanna talk cars and this and that. My buddy has a Gran National with a v6 that will smoke the hell out of that El Camino you are talking about. This beast makes over 900RWHP and over 1200lbs of tq. Now what??? I can also keep on naming cars if you want me to jerky boy.

Lets all play nice now

I'd like to drive this instead.