Working on overhaul of our moderation system

could the cropped - AI and Altered/photoshopped also be added to the reportlist ?

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

Looks good to me!

Could you also look into the possibility to make it so that if a picture is sideways/upside down, after we rotate it the good way, we can reverse search engine and it actually looks for the rotated pic and not the sideways one. Otherwise, we can't check those properly.

Will have to look into this.

Quote:

Originally posted by boobiemonster

could the cropped - AI and Altered/photoshopped also be added to the reportlist ?

The reporting system is going to get an overhaul also. Good you mentioned it, I haven't mentioned it, but was part of the plan!

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

Looks good to me!

Could you also look into the possibility to make it so that if a picture is sideways/upside down, after we rotate it the good way, we can reverse search engine and it actually looks for the rotated pic and not the sideways one. Otherwise, we can't check those properly.

Why bother with this at all. If the pic is uploaded sideways or upside down just reject it as 'quality'. If the uploader is that careless or lazy that's their problem, not ours.

Quote:

Originally posted by AJ100

Why bother with this at all. If the pic is uploaded sideways or upside down just reject it as 'quality'. If the uploader is that careless or lazy that's their problem, not ours.

this has nothing to do with carelessness or lazyness from the uploader....
in next link they explain why this happens (c/p link in browser to make it work)
https://kb.blackbaud.com/knowledgebase/Article/23917

Quote:

Originally posted by boobiemonster

this has nothing to do with carelessness or lazyness from the uploader....
in next link they explain why this happens (c/p link in browser to make it

I wouldn't know if the library we use to convert/manipulate images looks at the meta data for orientation. I was aware that this could happen. I will look into it when I have the time.

Small update, most of the new system is done. I am currently working on reworking the whole reporting system. For example when reporting a wrong category, you must select new category.

What kind of report reasons should we add?

Current reasons:

1 => 'A person in content is a Professional or Celebrity',
2 => 'Content is from you or your organisation and with to be taken off',
3 => 'Content has logo, url or copyright marks on it',
4 => 'Content is broken',
5 => 'Content is in wrong category',
7 => 'Duplicate content',
8 => 'Person in content is underage',
9 => 'Content does not belong in current series',
10 => 'Insult',
11 => 'Other reason',

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

Current reasons:

1 => 'A person in content is a Professional or Celebrity',
2 => 'Content is from you or your organisation and with to be taken off',
3 => 'Content has logo, url or copyright marks on it',
4 => 'Content is broken',
5 => 'Content is in wrong category',
7 => 'Duplicate content',
8 => 'Person in content is underage',
9 => 'Content does not belong in current series',
10 => 'Insult',
11 => 'Other reason',

Could add "Content is AI generated" as this is something I often see in the comments of AI pics that go accepted by mistake.
Maybe "Content is cropped or photoshopped" too as some users seem to be reporting those too, probably would require providing a link to uncropped/unalteraed pic to confirm the report.

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

Could add "Content is AI generated" as this is something I often see in the comments of AI pics that go accepted by mistake.
Maybe "Content is cropped or photoshopped" too as some users seem to be reporting those too, probably would require providing a link to uncropped/unalteraed pic to confirm the report.

With some reporting will require for example model name, and url. Cropped would a url be a good one..

if you ask for reports to do it from users, then moderators should have to do the same when they reject it.

Quote:

Originally posted by mysecondaccount

if you ask for reports to do it from users, then moderators should have to do the same when they reject it.

@sogood: The system works if everybody helps out.

Quote:

Originally posted by mysecondaccount

if you ask for reports to do it from users, then moderators should have to do the same when they reject it.

We do - that's why you see on your rejections when an image is rejected for "underage", "professional", "duplicate" etc.

I do think that we should have to select a deletion reason (same options as already listed) when we are removing images that were initially accepted.