Incorrect series linkage?

2 different women in this serie https://whatboyswant.com/series/6169
woman 1 : https://whatboyswant.com/babes/naked-babes/879205
woman 2 : https://whatboyswant.com/babes/naked-babes/1391701

Quote:

Originally posted by boobiemonster

2 different women in this serie 1 : 2 :

Sorted.

in this serie https://whatboyswant.com/series/70628 the next 2 pictures should be removed and put together

https://whatboyswant.com/babes/non-nude-babes/410947
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/non-nude-babes/399618

Quote:

Originally posted by boobiemonster

in this serie (70628) the next 2 pictures should be removed and put together

Done.

I just C/P my message from post #5421779 , once again those 2 big series were put together....

these 2 ladies were already separated after my request in post #5412658 on page 10 of this thread....
https://whatboyswant.com/forums/general/feedback/incorrect-series-linkage--168611?page=10#post-5412658
Unfortunately somebody has linked them again together and it was accepted by a mod
So everything has to be done again....

https://whatboyswant.com/series/2429

girl 1
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/flashing-babes/3504468

girl 2
https://whatboyswant.com/babes/lingerie-babes/3291087

Quote:

Originally posted by boobiemonster

I just C/P my message from post #5421779 , once again those 2 big series were put together....

these 2 ladies were already separated after my request in post #5412658 on page 10 of this somebody has linked them again together and it was accepted by a mod
So everything has to be done

I fix this huge series TWICE myself awhile back (Both these women are among my all time favorites) . How they keep getting combined in ridiculous These two women look NOTHING alike ! !

Quote:

Originally posted by boobiemonster

I just C/P my message from post #5421779 , once again those 2 big series were put together....

these 2 ladies were already separated after my request in post #5412658 on page 10 of this somebody has linked them again together and it was accepted by a mod
So everything has to be done

😡 Someone else can do it this time, I've separated them twice in a matter of months recently and I haven't got the patience to do it for a 3rd time. Especially if AJ100 has also done it a few times previous to that.

It would be fine if the separating process was as easy as selecting 50 images (for example) and clicking "create new series", but unfortunately you have to unattach each photo individually before re-linking (individually). It takes too long and clearly isn't worth it if someone keeps re-linking the two.

Mistake warning

I understand that the young man, feverish for glory, is ready to throw shit at the fan.

But photos
‣ 4386411
‣ 4388009
‣ 4388235
‣ 4388236
should definitely not be linked to series 260757.

Quote:

Originally posted by funkykoval69

Mistake warning
…

Now you have over six thousand photos to separate.

I will give you a hint that the photos uploaded by Calbert should be placed in a another series.

Quote:

Originally posted by funkykoval69

Now you have six thousand photos to separate.

I will give you a hint that the photos uploaded by Calbert should be placed in a another series.

The series link you put in your first message doesn't work btw.

This is another series that will have to wait to be separated as splitting so many images would take far too long with the current process.

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Sentinel

The series link you put in your first message doesn't work btw.

At the 2024-04-14 19:47 GMT it was the proper one different than what has been created as a result of incorrect connection.

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Sentinel

… to be separated as splitting so many images …

Currently 6757 and rising. Hence my hint for you.

Quote:

Originally posted by funkykoval69

I will give you a hint that the photos uploaded by should be placed in a another series.

Quote:

Originally posted by funkykoval69

Currently 6757 and rising. Hence my hint for you.

And it will continue to rise every time another image of either woman is added. As I said, the current method of unlinking a series of images takes so long, having to unlink the incorrect images one by one, keeping a record of those images, and then linking them all together in their own series (one by one). This takes ages when we’re dealing with a series of 300 images that have been wrongly linked, so I dread to think how long 6000+ would take.

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Sentinel

And it will continue to rise every time another image of either woman is added. As I said, the current method of unlinking a series of images takes so long, having to unlink the incorrect images one by one, keeping a record of those images, and then linking them all together in their own series (one by one). This takes ages when we’re dealing with a series of 300 images that have been wrongly linked, so I dread to think how long 6000 would take.

I'm going to work on a tool to streamline series management. Alsof gonna work on a tool that create series from users with their own content, or maybe even limit a some series to only be from one uploader.

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

I'm going to work on a tool to streamline series management. Alsof gonna work on a tool that create series from users with their own content, or maybe even limit a some series to only be from one uploader.

You the man !

Great, great job!