Moderator-poll / Blurry pics at the gallery

Hey all the fellow mods and admins !

I have seen a lot of complaining about Wbw's quality at the gallery-comments lately.
I believe many other comment-mod has seen the same.
Just wondering, if comments like this should tell us something to be done differently in the future.
"Way to go Wbw, Blurrypic heaven ! or "The curse of Wbw, crappy quality pics" etc....

Imho, I'd delete them all, no matter who the poster is, sponsor or not, demigod or not, mod or not.

What do you think ? Vote and discuss please ?

I delete all blurry pics also..

yea, to be honest Julle, I have approved some of them before. I have always tried to follow an inbuilt quideline to approve such pics which are only a bit blurry, but otherwisely the pic is very very good.

Still, it seems that viewers mostly hate a crappy quality pic, no matter what. That's why I wanted to know what all the other"pr0n-pro's and the owner thinks about them....

If this is going to be a high-class porn site, then all blurry pics should be terminated..

Blurry pics sucks. Delete is my opinion. Quality is more important than quantity.

Except for those fuckers who still keep voting 1 for every picture.

yep. and i believe we'd all hate to see wbw's popularity go down from the level it already had.




of course, the site has many other attractions than just the gallery-pics, but still....

Quote:

Originally posted by VicVega

of course, the site has many other attractions than just the gallery-pics, but still....

Yeah, I visit in the babe galleries about once in 6 months. I didn't even knew we have picture series before I uploaded some pics.

Quote:

Originally posted by Åscaris

...

Yeah, I visit in the babe galleries about once in 6 months. I didn't even knew we have picture series before I uploaded some pics.

i know. most of the "old" members dont look at the gallery-pics very often.

hell, even i dont. if i wasn't a picmod, i'd know very little what's goin on in there....
but doing pics every time while in here, keeps me updated about it's situation.

I voted to ban the worst quality blurry pics.

A lot of the pics from the 2003/2004 aren't of great quality, and a lot of the pics of girl on webcams aren't of great quality, yet they still appeal to a large number of our members.

Blurry pics suck. ban them all.

Quote:

Originally posted by EricLindros

I voted to ban the worst quality blurry pics.

A lot of the pics from the 2003/2004 aren't of great quality, and a lot of the pics of girl on webcams aren't of great quality, yet they still appeal to a large number of our members.

yea, i know. i should have put the webcam-babes option there. that's the only subgallery which would have to be the same as before.

i didn't mean webcam-babes. the whinings i have seen have all been about the other subgalleries and their pics.

delete all blurry.

Like you said, "quality over quantity"

I also hate webcam photos. But it's not my call, I dont even visit babe galleries.

But I just hate them.

i dont like the webcam-pics either. i just mod them cause it's my job without second thoughts.

if you can't see em.....delete em

I think we should only get rid of the ones that are very poor quality that hinder the picture itself.

i say ban the worst blurry pics

i mean we let ugly women in, why not a little blurry pics? the people will vote them down if theyre bad quality



i dont think we should have a lot of decision about quality except in extreme (or "worst"cases, because then it becomes to much of a personal opinion. its hard to make modding guidelines for that.

what one person might see as a little blurry, might seem normal to someone else

ok, how about this: ban all the butt-ugly babes and blurry pics ?

What about drunken babe mods... if they see everything as blurred alot of pics could get blitzed

Quote:

Originally posted by VicVega

ok, how about this: ban all the butt-ugly babes and blurry pics ?

well damn. that sure would clear out half the queue in a hurry!