Moderator corrections for the new version.

Thank you.

Quote:

Originally posted by Kanzen

Thank you.

Np

Another misslink : when on the moderate comments page, the "moderate comments" link on top leads to whatboyswant.com/comments/babes/queue instead of whatboyswant.com/comment/comments/moderate/babes

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

Two new bugs for mods :
- when using the show/hide taggers button, it often doesn't work and you have to add or remove a tag, refresh the page and then click the button again for it to work correctly
- the profile link on the "Moderate comments" page is wrong instead of

First one is a cache issue, I need to refresh system wide cache to let older tags work with this function, and very old tags won't show because with these there is no userid with these tags.
Second one, is fixed in next patch.

for the pre 7.0 version tags, I can do the following: add a Anonymous tag for them. So you know for sure that system doesn't know.

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

for the pre 7.0 version tags, I can do the following: add a Anonymous tag for them. So you know for sure that system doesn't know.

Sounds good

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

I gave Bangle, BWT, jullexxx and Kanzen the queue rights as it was already the case before the new version (as stated in the "meet the mods" thread).

Also:
Why is this function limited ? Look at some of the queues with 100's of pics in them and you'll see many dups, pros and garbage. Deleting one at a time is silly. I recall on more than one occasion where Jullexxx asked someone to look into a users queue after she had spent considerable time deleting pics and couldn't do any more because she had to go to work.

I don't know if this has been reported or not, but there's a problem with date and time posting. I'm in the Central time zone but the babe section is always a day behind. If I click on Monday and the pics have a day listed as Sunday. Yet pics have been posted today (Monday).

DEMO came with an idea to add a "Bondage / SM" category to galleries, this for sponsors ofcourse..

What do you guys think?

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

DEMO came with an idea to add a "Bondage / SM" category to galleries, this for sponsors ofcourse..

What do you guys think?

The idea is good but I don't think we get enough of that type of content to make it worth it ???

Quote:

Originally posted by AJ100

...

Also:
Why is this function limited ? Look at some of the queues with 100's of pics in them and you'll see many dups, pros and garbage. Deleting one at a time is silly. I recall on more than one occasion where Jullexxx asked someone to look into a users queue after she had spent considerable time deleting pics and couldn't do any more because she had to go to work.

I don't know if this has been reported or not, but there's a problem with date and time posting. I'm in the Central time zone but the babe section is always a day behind. If I click on Monday and the pics have a day listed as Sunday. Yet pics have been posted today (Monday).

About the queue function, I think Diz wanted to limit people only deleting pictures without accepting ones. I could be wrong but that's what I remember from the past discussions.
So, if a mod haven't queue right and feel that a member's upload should be checked, he can still send a PM to a queue mod online or an abuse note like Julle did today.

Concerning the date issue, you're not the only one noticing that as a couple members already reported it. I don't think that's a "bug" but more the fact that the database is located in Europe (maybe ?). Diz could give a more specific answer I guess.

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

DEMO came with an idea to add a "Bondage / SM" category to galleries, this for sponsors ofcourse..

What do you guys think?

Yes we could, I guess.
There doesn't seem to be a lot of content indeed but some categories have even less these days, like the webcam one for example.

I have put a picture online of my wife:
http://alpha.whatboyswant.com/babes/show/1542549/week

So don't delete, it looks prof, but it's not!

Did you take that pic yourself? Nice comp and lighting.

Quote:

Originally posted by bustMall

Did you take that pic yourself? Nice comp and lighting.

No, she did a photoshoot with a professional.

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

I have put a picture online of my wife: don't delete, it looks prof, but it's not!

She is too beautifull for you..

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

DEMO came with an idea to add a "Bondage / SM" category to galleries, this for sponsors ofcourse..

What do you guys think?

Good idea. If you notice, whenever a bondage pic is posted it gets a lotta hits. I believe a lot of uploads would happen if this category was created.

I think only the hardcore stuff should be classified for sponsors only.

Quote:

Originally posted by AJ100

...

Good idea. If you notice, whenever a bondage pic is posted it gets a lotta hits. I believe a lot of uploads would happen if this category was created.

I think only the hardcore stuff should be classified for sponsors only.

"Bondage / SM" will be added;

So picture moderators take notice about this.

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

...

No, she did a photoshoot with a professional.

Your wife is beautiful

But I'm wondering one thing : isn't a picture of an amateur photographed by a professional still copyrighted ?
I'm not asking that for those picture specifically Diz but because I already came across other pictures of amateur taken by pro and I always assumed they were copyrighted (so I didn't accept them).

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

...
Your wife is beautiful

But I'm wondering one thing : isn't a picture of an amateur photographed by a professional still copyrighted ?
I'm not asking that for those picture specifically Diz but because I already came across other pictures of amateur taken by pro and I always assumed they were copyrighted (so I didn't accept them).

If there is no copyright on them, then how are you to know.
I do a lot of model / personal photography and I sell a lot of it to customers without copyrights. They pay a bit more for it but it is theirs to do what they like with it including posting it on websites etc. It all depends on the package that the customer wants
Other stuff that I do that I copyright has copyrights and watermarks all over it so its fairly difficult to remove and I would say most professional photographers are the same.

Quote:

Originally posted by BWT

...

If there is no copyright on them, then how are you to know.
I do a lot of model / personal photography and I sell a lot of it to customers without copyrights. They pay a bit more for it but it is theirs to do what they like with it including posting it on websites etc. It all depends on the package that the customer wants
Other stuff that I do that I copyright has copyrights and watermarks all over it so its fairly difficult to remove and I would say most professional photographers are the same.

Ok, that's what I wanted to know.
Thanks, I'll change my way of modding those kind of pics then

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

...
Ok, that's what I wanted to know.
Thanks, I'll change my way of modding those kind of pics then

If we post a pic that doesn't have a copyright on it and then someone claims ownership of it and have the proof then we can just delete it at that point ... You cant get into legal trouble if there is no copyright and then you remove it at the request of the owner, if they request so.

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

...

"Bondage / SM" will be added;

So picture moderators take notice about this.

I see it has been added now ... Ill go and start moving some of the older stuff across into it ...
Can I just confirm that this going to be sponsor member category and that we are only going to put stuff that we would have normally put in Amatuer Porn category or are we going to move any bondage pic (even if it would normally go into naked babes or any of the non-sponsor categories) into this category