Quote:
Originally posted by Spidey_
Rule #1: Never talk about a crime.
Rule #2: See Rule #1!
Rule #3: Watch Matlock.
Fixed.
Quote:
Originally posted by Spidey_
Rule #1: Never talk about a crime.
Rule #2: See Rule #1!
Rule #3: Watch Matlock.
Quote:
Originally posted by rikko
Ah.....remember Forensics usually gets their man or woman sooner or later. There's an old "law" in Medicine that's almost as old (I think) than "The Germ Theory." The "Law" explains that all of us take something away at a crime scene or grandmas house and leave something behind. Yes....it's been tested empirically and it works. You can have a rubber Bio-hazard PPE on and the "law" still applies to you. (hang)
Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquin
...
My little sister is an investigator for the state. She says that's a bunch of shit. What usually happens is that there's some evidence, but it's not usually all that cut and dry.
Just because they find some hair, or even blood, from someone else at a crime scene doesn't mean the blood is new, doesn't mean that's where it came from, doesn't mean they were involved, and so on. Just because Person A's blood is on a dead person's shirt doesn't mean much, and very few convictions will come from that alone.
What really does it is that they talk about it, witnesses place them there, they can get a mountain of circumstantial evidence, and either cut a deal or force a confession. Either that or they tell someone about it.
She says that shit you see on Discovery where they find the guy and lock down an airtight case simply doesn't happen that often.
She's the one that originally told me that if you wanted to whack someone and get away with it, you probably could.
If you can hide the body and no one can figure out they're dead rather than just missing, that's a big step. Not knowing the person is an even bigger step, because they can only compare any samples of anything they might find to the suspect pool. If you're not a suspect, not associated with the victim in any way, and especially if your shit isn't on file (you're not already in the database for someone) she's pretty sure you can get away with it.
Of course, if you're that distantly removed from the person and from a life of crime (so that you're not already a suspect or in the database) then you probably don't know how to kill someone, don't know what to do with the body, and don't really have a reason to do it in the first place.
She's a pretty good investigator. She's young, but she's already testified twice at the State Supreme Court on murder trials. She's pretty sharp. Beyond that, her answer makes sense to me.
Quote:
Originally posted by rikko
...
You're sister needs to get re-training and/or a degree/advanced degree in Forensic Sciences. My uncle is a Forensic Pathologist for Bucks County, PA. He has his M.D(Professional Degree) and his Ph.D(Terminal Degree.)