Score: 0.00 Votes: 0
rate this

Man U fans

Starter: Bigdaddydiesel Posted: 19 years ago Views: 335
#1453077
Lvl 32

  • go on!

    43.05% (158)

  • dude..like wtf?!

    13.08% (48)

  • scary

    12.53% (46)

  • Good and hard

    5.72% (21)

  • funny

    5.45% (20)

  • piss off!

    5.18% (19)

  • yes!!!

    4.90% (18)

  • NOOOOO!!!!

    3.54% (13)

  • no

    1.63% (6)

  • yes?

    1.63% (6)

  • Rather eat soup

    1.36% (5)

  • yes

    1.09% (4)

  • No?

    0.54% (2)

Votes: 367
Has the Glazer thing really screwwed your club in the way you thought it would? So far has anything changed?
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453078
Lvl 32
I think if you look at it, it's J.P that fucked you over not Glazer
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453079
Lvl 25
I'm not a Man U Fan, although I do live in the Man U fan area...London. I don't think it has affected the club in any way.
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453080
Lvl 32
I think it was the Irish guys that fucked over United at least Glazer has been up front and said he's here to make money out of United not in a underhanded way like J.P McManus or Mr Terrance"I could give a fuck about West Ham" Brown have gone about lining there own pockets!!!
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453081
Lvl 25
Don't get me started on being fucked over by Terence Brown. I've been a West Ham fan all my life, what do we do, can't stop watching out team, but being now charged £1.50 booking fee per ticket after paying £40 for a ticket???

Season ticket holder but I find it hard to justify buying cup tickets etc when we are being mugged in broad daylight!!!
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453082
Lvl 23
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453083
Lvl 12
I think Glazer really put the club in a bad position when he put the club in debt whist buying it. when Roman got Chelski he didn't put the club in debt, he open up his own pocket book to help pay for new players. Glazer didn't have the money to buy the club outright so he put it in debt to do it. the club now has a drastically limited transfer buget and in the current transfer climate due to Chelski's money, United are not going to be able to get the big name transfers. United's hope now lies with their pretty solid youth development program.

Has glazer totally fucked the club, not really but he has put them behind the 8-ball. Can i place the blame on J.P. Mc Manus not really he is a buisness man and i think everyone knew that he was jsut out for the money. i can't blame him, if i wasn't a suporter of the team i owned i would look to maximise my investment. that's just how capitaism works.

In the end i think United will survive and do well, but the real team to follow now is FC United of Manchester

http://www.fc-utd.co.uk/index.php

Glory Glory Man United!!!!
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453084
Lvl 22
Quote:
Originally posted by WildRunner

but he has put them behind the 8-ball.


Dont play pool, but does this mean he has fucked em up the chuffer? If so, i agree completely.
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453085
Lvl 32
*Wonders where BBhoys is*
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453086
Lvl 14
I think business is business. but i don't think the man boought ManU to bring it in debt, I think he wants to see what's left of the club and than build a better club. The man doesn't do it for the money just for the power. You don't thnk it gives me more than i allready have in money noit brings me more in my personal life. I don't beleive that somebody buys a football club for his money but for his ego. He wants to bring in his philosofie to make the club more than it is allready. I think the irish guy didi it for the money but the amerikan guy did it right and before investing a lot of money into the club you have to build your ideas not under the old management. you have to create your own club and team. Make it better for everybody. yes offcourse he wants to make a bug but not for te money but to show the outsite world that he is doing it well. I beleive in a year or two ManU is back better than ever.
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453087
Lvl 22
Quote:
Originally posted by Bigdaddydiesel

*Wonders where BBhoys is*

was at work, like all good guys do

@WildRunner yeah!!



about the american scumbags...




@senja, you are wrong, he only do it for money...in his pockets, not in the club ones
i say kill those fuckers!

Glory Glory Man United!!!!
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453088
Lvl 5
Quote:
Originally posted by TickLer

I'm not a Man U Fan, although I do live in the Man U fan area...London. I don't think it has affected the club in any way.



yeah, cos manchester is full of city fans
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453089
Lvl 12
Senja, actually when he bought the club he put it into debt. think of it this way..... you have $100 and there is a company you want to buy for $200. this company has the potential for making money and you can prove this to a bank. so you go to the bank and say "i would like a loan for the extra $100 that i don't have." the bank then gives you this loan but instead of it being a loan in your name it is in the name of the company you just bought. so now you are the new owner of a company with a $100 debt from the start.

That is what Glazer did. he did not have enough money to buy all the Man United stock and so he borrowed it from a bank (which one i can't remember) and now Manchester United FC (the company) owes the remainder back to the bank. I hope that makes sense. I am not an expert when it comes to money and hostile take overs but that is basically what happend. Now the bank has a huge say in how much money MUFC can spend on things, such as transfers. I think the yearly transfer budget has been capped at jsut under 29.5 million pounds. When you want a player and Chelski is willing to pay upwards of 35 million for him then that leaves United is a shitty place.... Thanks Glazer, you fucktard!



Glory Glory Man United
* This post has been modified : 19 years ago
#1453090
Lvl 22
Quote:
Originally posted by WildRunner

Senja, actually when he bought the club he put it into debt. think of it this way..... you have $100 and there is a company you want to buy for $200. this company has the potential for making money and you can prove this to a bank. so you go to the bank and say "i would like a loan for the extra $100 that i don't have." the bank then gives you this loan but instead of it being a loan in your name it is in the name of the company you just bought. so now you are the new owner of a company with a $100 debt from the start.

That is what Glazer did. he did not have enough money to buy all the Man United stock and so he borrowed it from a bank (which one i can't remember) and now Manchester United FC (the company) owes the remainder back to the bank. I hope that makes sense. I am not an expert when it comes to money and hostile take overs but that is basically what happend. Now the bank has a huge say in how much money MUFC can spend on things, such as transfers. I think the yearly transfer budget has been capped at jsut under 29.5 million pounds. When you want a player and Chelski is willing to pay upwards of 35 million for him then that leaves United is a shitty place.... Thanks Glazer, you fucktard!



Glory Glory Man United


yeah, you explained it right.

* This post has been modified : 19 years ago