Quote:
Originally posted by brownell
Yes, inappropriate.
First, did you actually watch the clip and pay attention to how much time elapsed?
Second, do you have any experience what-so-ever with handguns, much less shooting a moving target.
Third, why would you shoot someone in the head for throwing a shoe? Do you actually think the SS is capable of drawing and firing a shot into the head of a moving person in a crowded room, yet incapable of identifying the object being thrown as a shoe?
Next time there's a Die Hard marathon on TV, maybe you should find something to do outside.
Why are you trying to make this out to be something it's not? Are you trying to play the "I know handguns" game with me? I assure you I am well aware of how difficult it is to hit a moving target even at close distances with a handgun. When I was saying the "before he get the throw off" and "brains splattering the wall" that's all an exaggeration. I wasn't serious. I am not expecting someone drawing Wyatt Earp style and shooting into a crowd. I am saying that throwing a projectile at the president of the United States is a direct threat to our national security and it is something that, according to our laws, allows for lethal force. If you're fucking stupid enough to throw things at these two men (two heads of state) than you should expect to be shot. Hell, it would help the gene pool...
Oh yeah, you might not want to abreviate Secret Service using "SS." It gives people the wrong idea.
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark191271
that was soooooooo close - i'd have loved to have been there - imagine the nasty inbred fascist getting caught square on the jaw with that size 10! i'd pay good money to see that - wish i coud have thrown the shoe at the murderous arse hole myself - i can absolutely guarantee you i would have been a better shot!
This is a good example Brownell. This guy either doesn't know what a facist is or he was exaggerating. Either way he is just as bad as what he thinks Bush is... Possibly worse.
Quote:
Originally posted by Latino
the guy should not be killed or any other retarded idea like that.
charged with assault maybe..
he was protesting the only way he could and the only way he could make it big.
Okay, when you look up "protest" in the dictionary it in now way condones violence. In fact, in America protest is encouraged. We have the right to protest. Now protest and violence combined is funadmentally different than protest. In fact, if this man was an American it could be described as an attempted coup.
Either way this man posed a direct threat to our national security. In the end it might have been a shoe and at most a bruise, but it could have been a grenade and two dead heads of state.
* This post has been modified
: 17 years ago
