Excuse me, but have you seen what Judge William Adams did to his daughter eight years ago?

Quote:

Originally posted by Tarquin

Fair enough. It was a hyperbolic example.

I guess the better example might be "They wouldn't have raped her as hard if she'd just dropped her pants for them."

i agree with you.

and kinda insulted by some of these comments on here.

she totally loved getting beat by her father with a belt. give me a break.

i download torrents and watch movies like crazy that are still in theaters, should i get hit 17 times with a belt by my father for that?

I agree with Tarquin too, I just don't think using rape as an example is the way to go. Why not just go with the actual story.. although her father went a bit overboard, if she just did what she was asked in the first place it is quite possible the belting would have been much less severe and maybe limited to two or three wacks. She obviously knows dad is a bit hot headed, he is a fucking judge ffs and although he seems like a cunt, he is her father, she lives under his roof and should abide by his rules until she's old enough to leave. Just the fact she posted the video online tells me quite a bit about the type of girl she is.

Must be a chip off the old block, karma will sort them both out.

There is a special place in hell for those people!!

this was 6 years ago. she posted it because she thought it made make him real what a piece of shit he is.

i don't even feel like trying to defend her anymore because reading this is just making me mad. i just feel so bad for her.

you're totttally right. she should have just laid on her stomach. that totally would have stopped him. right. horseshit.

For what it's worth, one time, my Dad chased me up the stairs to my room and didn't stop until he hit me on the fanny real good with his bare hand. As far as I can see, this did nothing but make me hate the mother fucker. Now he's dead. Fine.

who cares what he did she deserved to get beat anyone who thinks that it is wrong to punish your child needs to get beat themselves

Soiled little girl probably deserved a whipping. If she would have laid down and took it I bet she would have only got a couple of whacks. Now daddy is going to take away the.car(Mercedes) because.she quit school and she decides to ruin his life.




Don't call women by derogatory names.
EL

So, this thread got outta hand a bit.

Everyone, remember that you can disagree about what someone says, but you can't just start throwing personal insults around. No flaming people, ya know? Also, let's all remember the rules about how we're supposed to refer to women (Protip: Not in insulting terms).


Thread cleaned.

Quote:

Originally posted by braboy69

who cares what he did she deserved to get beat anyone who thinks that it is wrong to punish your child needs to get beat themselves

How you doin' Judge Adams? I bet you're pretty pissed that you're going to lose your job now, eh?

Quote:

Originally posted by kiefjones

Soiled little girl probably deserved a whipping. If she would have laid down and took it I bet she would have only got a couple of whacks. Now daddy is going to take away the.car(Mercedes) because.she quit school and she decides to ruin his life.

Why does it matter why she released the tape? Whatever her motivation doesn't excuse his actions, which were illegal. You can't beat a handicapped child just because she didn't listen to you, and it's ridiculous to say that it's her fault for not lying down and taking her beating like a good obedient whipping-subject.

You're saying here that she deserved a more severe beating because she didn't listen. So, if after these beatings she continues to defy him, is he allowed to up the ante? Can he use a lead pipe next time? A wrench? How many times does she have to disobey her father before he's allowed to just kill her?


You can't beat children just because they're your children. You see, they're also human beings with rights - the right to not be assaulted by an adult who disagrees with something they've done.

Judges daughter arrested for downloading pirated music and movies.

Judges family sued for thousands in file sharing lawsuit.

This too would have ended his career.

He shouldnt have gone as far as he did and yes she didnt obey her mother or father. Shes a spoiled brat who doesnt realize the consequences of her actions.

But he had every reason to be very angry. As a judge his kids reflect on him. Downloading stolen property doesnt sit well with those sentenced to jail for stealing property.

First, copyright infringement isn't comparable to stealing property. To steal property you need to deprive someone else of some physical property. File-sharing does not do that.

Second, what specifically are you talking about? Are you saying she was a spoiled brat when she was 16 and being beaten by her father, or are you saying she's a spoiled brat now for releasing the tape?

If it's the latter, I don't see why the reason she released the tape matters. Sure, her current motive was selfish. So what? That doesn't excuse his behavior.

If it's the former, well, that's an asinine assertion because you don't know anything about her life-situation at that point in time.

Shes a spoiled brat because he told her not to download and she did it again. Those actions could have ended his career had she been one of the many sued and still being sued for illegal file sharing.

Copyright infringement is stealing property. Copyrights are property. Taking property without right is stealing. Its referred to as stealing all the time by federal judges.

Quote:

Originally posted by mal

Shes a spoiled brat because he told her not to download and she did it again. Those actions could have ended his career had she been one of the many sued and still being sued for illegal file sharing.

No, she's defiant. You know, like every child who's ever lived at some point or another.

You can't say she's spoiled because that implies that you know how she was treated and the lifestyle she lived at age 16. You don't know these things so you can't say she's spoiled.

Quote:

Originally posted by mal

Copyright infringement is stealing property. Copyrights are property. Taking property without right is stealing. Its referred to as stealing all the time by federal judges.

Federal Judges used to refer to african americans as property - that doesn't make it so. My shoes are my property. If you take them I can't use them; in order for you to steal my property I must be deprived of something. An mp3 is not property, because if you take my mp3, I can still use my mp3.

Seeing as you think theft of intellectual property is actual theft, do you think public libraries are illegal? You should, if you're trying to be intellectually consistent.

His attorney will submit that her and her boyfriend attempted to extort him, and they very well may face criminal charges, as they should.

Quote:

Originally posted by looker6417

His attorney will submit that her and her boyfriend attempted to extort him, and they very well may face criminal charges, as they should.

Curious, why do you automatically believe his side of the story - which is just a verbal accusation - over her version of the story, in which she said he essentially "dared her" to post it?

I ask because this fella might not be the most trustworthy guy in the world, you know, since he has a propensity to do crazy-assed things like, oh, I don't know, beating handicapped children.

BTW, good luck getting a DA to charge her with theft (which is the section of the penal code blackmail falls under in Texas). That'd be career suicide. A civil charge might stick, but again, that's probably not a road he wants to take, politically and PR wise.

I didn't think the belting was as bad as everyone seems to think. He told her to lie down because he wanted to hit her on the butt and it was obvious he hesitated a few times so as not to get her anywhere around the upper body. His anger escalated because she wouldn't lie down and he didn't want to hurt her too badly.

These things are never nice to watch no matter how you look at it. Discipline is there for a reason, not for enjoyment and I think all parents have a right to choose how they dish it out.

If the guy was the savage people are making him sound, you would think he broke every bone in her face before sexually abusing her with the same baseball bat.

Quote:

Originally posted by Scrog

These things are never nice to watch no matter how you look at it. Discipline is there for a reason, not for enjoyment and I think all parents have a right to choose how they dish it out.

Really?

What if he chooses to dish it out by punching her in the face with brass knuckles? What if he chooses to discipline her by beating her with a lead pipe?

Well that's going way too far obviously, any parent who does that should be treated with the full force of the law. There are limitations to take into account as well as different methods of punishment, that's why I say it's up to the parent. They know their own child more than anyone else does.

Dros, if you ever write a book or release a song, I'll bet you feel a little differently. Definition won't mean quite so much to ya then.

Just sayin'...

Quote:

Originally posted by EricLindros

...

No, she's defiant. You know, like every child who's ever lived at some point or another.

You can't say she's spoiled because that implies that you know how she was treated and the lifestyle she lived at age 16. You don't know these things so you can't say she's spoiled.


...

Federal Judges used to refer to african americans as property - that doesn't make it so. My shoes are my property. If you take them I can't use them; in order for you to steal my property I must be deprived of something. An mp3 is not property, because if you take my mp3, I can still use my mp3.

Seeing as you think theft of intellectual property is actual theft, do you think public libraries are illegal? You should, if you're trying to be intellectually consistent.

Libraries are not stealing. They are specifically included in copyright law. Which the copyright holder should be aware of. She didnt access the music from a libarary.

More importantly your argument is esoteric that you disagree with copyright laws and not what the law is.

No one will wax philosophical when a judges child is caught downloading music for free. When others are being punished for the same act so too will the judge and his family be punished.

Moreover he may think its stealing. You may not. Its not your kid. Hes teaching her not to steal and/or not get him in hot water for her actions.

News posts "for using the internet" she gets beaten. Thats diluting the issue quite a bit.

Man goes to jail 'for using the internet'. (downloading illegal porn) Diluted a bit huh.

She got a whipping for committing theft in his home. Not unreasonable at all. You may not agree with corporal punishment. He obviously does and it is still legal within reason.

The judge says she posted this video after he took her Mercedes away from her.

If he was charged hed be found not guilty. He should sue her for publication of private fact.