3 some question

how many guys would be willing to have a 3 some or moresome with their girlfirend/wife if their girl/wife wanted it to be with 2 or more guys. Yes we all know we are all more than willing to have it the other way with 2 or more girls. But I am sure the ladies feel the same way we do when it comes to the 3 somes.

No. To me it's borderline gay. Especially like a DP or something. I don't want another dudes junk anywhere near mine. So no thank you.

a 3some with my girl and another guy would be fine if she also agreed on a 3some with another girl!

I think when it comes to a 3some or anything like that both you and your other half have to be equally open minded.

I honestly dont think I could ever stand the thought of another dick being inside the girl that I love.

Even I draw the line somewhere.

Quote:

Originally posted by Jack.jpg

I honestly dont think I could ever stand the thought of another dick being inside the girl that I love.

Even I draw the line somewhere.

I agree. I wouldn't be able to do it.

3 some, 4 some, i don´t mind as long as there is exactly one dick involved.

Quote:

Originally posted by Pophai

3 some, 4 some, i don´t mind as long as there is exactly one dick involved.

"But I am sure the ladies feel the same way we do"

Biological reproductive impulse says they don't. I'm sure there's some psychological pressures for some women-- particularly survivors of sexual trama-- to seek out situations that allow them to relive/seek out intense sexual experiences in a controlled, safe way that the women can "master." However, I doubt most women have the same drive to experience a threesome (or moresome) that men do.

Men have a natural impulse to spred their genes as much as they can, but there are also very strong social pressures for them to "be a man" and take care of their partner, etc. These pressures are good because they convince us to support the women that can/are raising our children. The only "problem" is that the pressures are counter to our impulse to spred our genes, hence, some men will cheat. The "threesome" with multiple women creates a contolled atmosphere wherein the men have an opportunity to spred their genes further (or at least act like they are) with minimized consequences for doing so. If a man wants a threesome with his wife/girlfriend and another woman, it's so he can act on this impulse to spred his seed. It almost doesn't matter who the second female is (mild attraction is generally necessary to cause an erection, of course).

Women, on the other hand, have a natural impulse to find the most fit partner for reproducing with. Their judgement can be impaired, but that's the basic instinct. When women cheat, it's not because they have an impulse to do so in the same way that men do-- it's because they're "trading up" or sabotaging the current relationship so they have an excuse to leave their current man. For example: there's the classic cliche of a woman marrying a financially secure partner and seeking out an affair in order to (consciously or not) impregnate herself with a stronger gene donor, then having the financially secure partner raise her child. If a woman wants a threesome with her husband/boy friend and another man, the chances are good she's either acting out to master a sexual trama (in which case the quality of the third person is not critically important), or she's attempting to "trade up" without the social guilt of lying to her current-- already deemed adequate-- partner (in which case the quality of the third person is very important).

Besides the whole "it's half gay" stigma associated with 2M, 1F threesomes, men should naturally mistrust such an experience because there's a possibility that his partner will become impregnated with the rogue male's child. And when that happens, the legitimate partner will be expending resources on a child that is not his own. Women can have a similar mistrust of 2F, 1M threesomes because there's a chance that their male's resources will be diverted from her to another female's child, which, depending on the means of her partner, could be bad for the current or future care of her child. However, I think because of the dynamics of sexuality (a female can only become pregnant, at maximum, once every 9-10 months, whereas a male can potentially impregnate thousands of women in the same time-span), men are given more biological incentive to avoid situations in which their chosen partner is at risk of becoming impregnated by another man.

Therefore, "it's just not natural" for men to participate in their wife/girlfriend's infidelity with another man. And depending on a male's means, or the female's ability to "trade up" in the case of an accidental impregnation (that could absorb the male's means), it's may not be tolerable for a woman to participate in their husband/boyfriend's infidelity. However, it's my opinion that 2F/1M threesomes are more biologically acceptable to a couple than 2M/1F threesomes.

That, and there's more women on the planet than men, which is clearly God telling us it's okay to have 2F/1M threesomes.

[/bullshit]

Seriously though, I'd never have a 2M/1F threesome because I wouldn't be into the dude. For similar reasons, I might do a 2F/1M threesome if everyone involved was into it-- if I got the impression one of the girls wasn't into the other girl being there, I might call off the whole thing. Can't say for sure, though, until I find myself in a situation where the threesome actually goes beyond talk.

Damn dude, where did you copy and paste that from?

too many words to read...

Quote:

Originally posted by Tadzio

"But I am sure the ladies feel the same way we do"

Biological reproductive impulse says they don't. I'm sure there's some psychological pressures for some women-- particularly survivors of sexual trama-- to seek out situations that allow them to relive/seek out intense sexual experiences in a controlled, safe way that the women can "master." However, I doubt most women have the same drive to experience a threesome (or moresome) that men do.

Men have a natural impulse to spred their genes as much as they can, but there are also very strong social pressures for them to "be a man" and take care of their partner, etc. These pressures are good because they convince us to support the women that can/are raising our children. The only "problem" is that the pressures are counter to our impulse to spred our genes, hence, some men will cheat. The "threesome" with multiple women creates a contolled atmosphere wherein the men have an opportunity to spred their genes further (or at least act like they are) with minimized consequences for doing so. If a man wants a threesome with his wife/girlfriend and another woman, it's so he can act on this impulse to spred his seed. It almost doesn't matter who the second female is (mild attraction is generally necessary to cause an erection, of course).

Women, on the other hand, have a natural impulse to find the most fit partner for reproducing with. Their judgement can be impaired, but that's the basic instinct. When women cheat, it's not because they have an impulse to do so in the same way that men do-- it's because they're "trading up" or sabotaging the current relationship so they have an excuse to leave their current man. For example: there's the classic cliche of a woman marrying a financially secure partner and seeking out an affair in order to (consciously or not) impregnate herself with a stronger gene donor, then having the financially secure partner raise her child. If a woman wants a threesome with her husband/boy friend and another man, the chances are good she's either acting out to master a sexual trama (in which case the quality of the third person is not critically important), or she's attempting to "trade up" without the social guilt of lying to her current-- already deemed adequate-- partner (in which case the quality of the third person is very important).

Besides the whole "it's half gay" stigma associated with 2M, 1F threesomes, men should naturally mistrust such an experience because there's a possibility that his partner will become impregnated with the rogue male's child. And when that happens, the legitimate partner will be expending resources on a child that is not his own. Women can have a similar mistrust of 2F, 1M threesomes because there's a chance that their male's resources will be diverted from her to another female's child, which, depending on the means of her partner, could be bad for the current or future care of her child. However, I think because of the dynamics of sexuality (a female can only become pregnant, at maximum, once every 9-10 months, whereas a male can potentially impregnate thousands of women in the same time-span), men are given more biological incentive to avoid situations in which their chosen partner is at risk of becoming impregnated by another man.

Therefore, "it's just not natural" for men to participate in their wife/girlfriend's infidelity with another man. And depending on a male's means, or the female's ability to "trade up" in the case of an accidental impregnation (that could absorb the male's means), it's may not be tolerable for a woman to participate in their husband/boyfriend's infidelity. However, it's my opinion that 2F/1M threesomes are more biologically acceptable to a couple than 2M/1F threesomes.

That, and there's more women on the planet than men, which is clearly God telling us it's okay to have 2F/1M threesomes.

[/bullshit]

Seriously though, I'd never have a 2M/1F threesome because I wouldn't be into the dude. For similar reasons, I might do a 2F/1M threesome if everyone involved was into it-- if I got the impression one of the girls wasn't into the other girl being there, I might call off the whole thing. Can't say for sure, though, until I find myself in a situation where the threesome actually goes beyond talk.

i´d rather have a 3 some with 2 other guys than reading this.

Quote:

Originally posted by donkeypunchkid

[reply=Jack.jpg]
I honestly dont think I could ever stand the thought of another dick being inside the girl that I love.

Even I draw the line somewhere.

I agree. I wouldn't be able to do it.
[/reply]



yea i couldn't even do it.

Quote:

Originally posted by Pophai

i´d rather have a 3 some with 2 other guys than reading this.

Then concentrate on the punchline and my honest response:

Quote:

Originally posted by Tadzio

there's more women on the planet than men, which is clearly God telling us it's okay to have 2F/1M threesomes.

[/bullshit]

Seriously though, I'd never have a 2M/1F threesome because I wouldn't be into the dude. For similar reasons, I might do a 2F/1M threesome if everyone involved was into it-- if I got the impression one of the girls wasn't into the other girl being there, I might call off the whole thing. Can't say for sure, though, until I find myself in a situation where the threesome actually goes beyond talk.

...the punchline doesn't hit as well without the lead-in, though. So you're missing out

ah, a lot better. i second that. i mean the sentence before bullshit.

Quote:

Originally posted by G35

[reply=donkeypunchkid]
[reply=Jack.jpg]
I honestly dont think I could ever stand the thought of another dick being inside the girl that I love.

Even I draw the line somewhere.

I agree. I wouldn't be able to do it.
[/reply]



yea i couldn't even do it.
[/reply]

I gthink I'd freek if another mans balls touched mine on a dp

Quote:

Originally posted by Pophai

[reply=Tadzio]
"But I am sure the ladies feel the same way we do"

Biological reproductive impulse says they don't. I'm sure there's some psychological pressures for some women-- particularly survivors of sexual trama-- to seek out situations that allow them to relive/seek out intense sexual experiences in a controlled, safe way that the women can "master." However, I doubt most women have the same drive to experience a threesome (or moresome) that men do.

Men have a natural impulse to spred their genes as much as they can, but there are also very strong social pressures for them to "be a man" and take care of their partner, etc. These pressures are good because they convince us to support the women that can/are raising our children. The only "problem" is that the pressures are counter to our impulse to spred our genes, hence, some men will cheat. The "threesome" with multiple women creates a contolled atmosphere wherein the men have an opportunity to spred their genes further (or at least act like they are) with minimized consequences for doing so. If a man wants a threesome with his wife/girlfriend and another woman, it's so he can act on this impulse to spred his seed. It almost doesn't matter who the second female is (mild attraction is generally necessary to cause an erection, of course).

Women, on the other hand, have a natural impulse to find the most fit partner for reproducing with. Their judgement can be impaired, but that's the basic instinct. When women cheat, it's not because they have an impulse to do so in the same way that men do-- it's because they're "trading up" or sabotaging the current relationship so they have an excuse to leave their current man. For example: there's the classic cliche of a woman marrying a financially secure partner and seeking out an affair in order to (consciously or not) impregnate herself with a stronger gene donor, then having the financially secure partner raise her child. If a woman wants a threesome with her husband/boy friend and another man, the chances are good she's either acting out to master a sexual trama (in which case the quality of the third person is not critically important), or she's attempting to "trade up" without the social guilt of lying to her current-- already deemed adequate-- partner (in which case the quality of the third person is very important).

Besides the whole "it's half gay" stigma associated with 2M, 1F threesomes, men should naturally mistrust such an experience because there's a possibility that his partner will become impregnated with the rogue male's child. And when that happens, the legitimate partner will be expending resources on a child that is not his own. Women can have a similar mistrust of 2F, 1M threesomes because there's a chance that their male's resources will be diverted from her to another female's child, which, depending on the means of her partner, could be bad for the current or future care of her child. However, I think because of the dynamics of sexuality (a female can only become pregnant, at maximum, once every 9-10 months, whereas a male can potentially impregnate thousands of women in the same time-span), men are given more biological incentive to avoid situations in which their chosen partner is at risk of becoming impregnated by another man.

Therefore, "it's just not natural" for men to participate in their wife/girlfriend's infidelity with another man. And depending on a male's means, or the female's ability to "trade up" in the case of an accidental impregnation (that could absorb the male's means), it's may not be tolerable for a woman to participate in their husband/boyfriend's infidelity. However, it's my opinion that 2F/1M threesomes are more biologically acceptable to a couple than 2M/1F threesomes.

That, and there's more women on the planet than men, which is clearly God telling us it's okay to have 2F/1M threesomes.

[/bullshit]

Seriously though, I'd never have a 2M/1F threesome because I wouldn't be into the dude. For similar reasons, I might do a 2F/1M threesome if everyone involved was into it-- if I got the impression one of the girls wasn't into the other girl being there, I might call off the whole thing. Can't say for sure, though, until I find myself in a situation where the threesome actually goes beyond talk.

i´d rather have a 3 some with 2 other guys than reading this.


[/reply]


but only one of them can be called dick

nope chicks only in my bed sorry. could possible deal with another guy in the saes room given he was at least 6 ft away didn't aknowledge my presence and was busy with own chick.

Quote:

Originally posted by Bigdaddydiesel

[reply=G35]
[reply=donkeypunchkid]
[reply=Jack.jpg]
I honestly dont think I could ever stand the thought of another dick being inside the girl that I love.

Even I draw the line somewhere.

I agree. I wouldn't be able to do it.
[/reply]



yea i couldn't even do it.
[/reply]

I gthink I'd freek if another mans balls touched mine on a dp
[/reply]

agree

My wife and I have already agreed to do the mfm thing with my best friend (already talked to him about it and he's willing / wanting to). The agreement is that any of us can stop it at any time if it gets too weird and that it's a crime against nature if me and him even get close to touching each other - basically, no dp. Even though she said she would do it, it's just too risky...