alltime favorite car

Nice choice!

a shelby gt 500 in prestine condition just sold for about a million U.S. dollars! If i had the dough id buy one. You could get a replica like in gone in 60 seconds for about 100,000 U.S.

Quote:

I'll see your Bentley bachiotomy and raise you a Lister Storm - seats 4 adults in comfort plus their luggage, 594hp V12 does 0-60 in 4.1 seconds and a top speed of 208mph. Care to raise the bet?

captain you can take that luggage and shove it up your exhaust!
and thats 4 "adults" like the porshe 911 is!

http://www.europeancarweb.com/firstlook/0402ec_bentley/
world's fastest 4 seater is their claim not mine, so i could care less about a bet, especially with you!----->captain thats why its in quotes in my original post!

oh now i see jaguar i should've known! :/ after reading both, definatly bentley gt
http://www.ultimatecarpage.com/frame.mv?file=car.mv&num=589

my fav car of all time is a 1969 corvette, 427 RAT motor, with 4 speed muncie rockcrusher transmission(i believe there were only 20 or so of these made with this motor), many are now faster, handle better and brake better....but it is my personal dream car, beautiful....and muscle car fast....

OMG, i was driving and i saw an original shelby. it was fucking awesome, in a custom blue paint job! badass!

1993 Missubishi 3000GT VR4

erik the viking, you are on the right track.

1970 chevelle ss with the 454 ls-6 block, or the 69 vette like you said

Take a few vallium bachiotomy, chill out, and grow a goddam sense of humour.
And this is officially the last time I respond to any of your posts.

i think you need a sense of humor chaos... and realize your not better and smarter than everyone else, knock off the attitude!

Captain_Chaos please do some research on the McLaren before you say dumb things like that again...

Ferrari Enzo is their fastest best handling car and it's 0-60 is 3.5 seconds McLarens is 2.4 so obviously it's not faster on the pick up McLaren also has a higher top speed better braking distances FAR SUPERIOR HANDLING DUE TO THE DESIGN OF THE CAR AND THE DRIVERS SEAT BEING PLACED IN THE CENTER GIVING MAXIMUM VISIBILITY AND PLACING THE DRIVER UNDER 5' FROM THE ROAD A CLAIM NO OTHER CAR CAN MAKE and if anyone does crash a McLaren who cares they have a far better chance of surviving than a Ferrari driver as it outscores ferrari in crash tests also so please go check into the McLaren and note that it outscores everyother car in it's class even ferrari the McLaren is the fastest car it handles the best and is easiest to drive due to the center mounted seat your statement does not even make the least bit of sense "dur lets see is it easier to see and stop a car from crashing when you can see both sides of the car clearly and everything directly infront of you or if you are placed on one side of the car and can only see 1 side clearly and can't see anything directly infront of you" if you don't trust real world tests use some logic driving a car from the center allows full visibility all around the vehicle instead of just on 1 side

im deffinatly going with the Nissan Skyline, latemodel, with twin turbo pushing out around 900 hp

@ Psychism

Quote:

Captain_Chaos please do some research on the McLaren before you say dumb things like that again...

Nothing I said was dumb - please read my post correctly before you comment on it again, and don't go jumping on me just because my favourite car does not happen to coincide with yours. Calling me dumb was just arrogant. I never insulted you, so why start insulting me?

Listen, I simply answered the topic of this thread and expressed my own opinion that the 360 is my dream car. You were the one who responded and dragged in the F1 not me, dismissing my choice as worthless simply because of it's existance. As a result of your post I expained WHY I personally would prefer a 360 to an F1 as an every day car, and what I said was all factual. I never mentioned any performance details and I never even mentioned an Enzo, so god knows why you dragged them both up.

The F1 is a great car - I never said it wasn't. It's British and I'm proud we produced it okay! It just isn't my dream car. My dream car is a Ferrari 360 (in blue with tan hide if you want to know) because it looks gorgeous in my eyes and handles sublimely, McLaren or no McLaren. End of story.


Debate with me any time you want psychism, and I'm happy to debate with you. But don't jump over me and go getting your knickers in a twist because I have a different view than yours. You need to accept that a different opinion is not a criticism. Some people here seem not to understand that concept!

i had trouble with 405HP in a vette Z06... sooo much power, i couldn't even imagine 900 HP. must be incredible

SLR (just like my cameras!) 'nuff said

Nice!
http://www.whatboyswant.com/showcar/2326

significant i dont believe the skyline, even twin turbo, pushes 900hp. That turbo would have to be at such a high psi itd destroy the engine block. The r34 had a 0-60 in 5.2 and a 270 bhp. This is a single turbo, and adding an additional turbo is not gonna add another 630 hp. Now that 270 is the "official" bhp and the "real" hp is about 370. This is on the 10th gen. No skyline is gonna put out 900 bhp with a 3.0L engine, and about 293 ft. pounds of torque

http://www.whatboyswant.com/showcar/2283/category

THis car is a dream!

i would just like to say that Lamborgini diablos are soooooooooo over rated!! yes they look nice but thats as far as they go, i have seen them race at drags many a times, i was at the drags at caulder park (melbourne, Australia) and they had this guy who was racing one and my brother mate went up against him in his Holden VL commodore he has probly spent $50,000 on it and he kicked his ass!!! and the diablo costs $250,000 AU....now talk about dissapointment!!......im not trying to offened Lamborgini Enthusiests here!