bad quality or good we all like to look don`t we!.....I post all these and all they do is block block block...Getting old this whatboyswant
Cherrylx I am with you sent in about 47 pics. none got posted you are so right Y bother
These are bad. Nobody wants these.
The moderation system is frustrating yes, but it's what keeps this website functioning independently of a big conglomerate porn site, and also what keeps it out of trouble. I find that unique and increasingly hard to find in the current internet world. If you want to just have anything accepted, I'm sure Pornhub or Youporn or any of those giants doesn't care what gets uploaded. But if you like the uniqueness here, you'll have to get used to it. You can always post to the forum what doesn't get uploaded; I think the moderation is far less strict for it.
I understand what you mean, I had some that was considered poor quality or other reasons. Some were poor quality but other were not.
I'm not a Moderator, but looking at the pictures above, I can see why they have been rejected. The bad quality are exactly that, bad quality. Other reasons have been rejected, I guess, because the lady is not displaying anything sexy, e.g. cleavage, a tight ass. One has a "live" flag in the corner, which means that it was initially accepted by a Moderator but subsequently reviewed and rejected. Possibly by another Moderator, I don't know. The Professional/Celebrity rejection is, in my opinion, arguable. A Professional/Celebrity is unlikely to pose in such a situation, but that seems to be the go-to reason for many rejections. There cannot possibly be that many Professionals/Celebrities in the world. I would have thought that it would be rejected under "Other". I have had many pictures rejected for being cropped. The dimensions of these were usually 1080 x 1080 or 1080 x 1440. It is highly unlikely that pictures with these dimensions have been cropped.
adventuresofc 6 months ago
It's a little frustrating on the speed of the uploads...
I think I had pics sit in Waiting for WEEKS... and now the same thing is happening to my videos.
It sucks, because those usually upload in like 3-4 hours, now I have 4 of THOSE in the queue.
Any ideas on what is happening, or how I can help expedite this?
One Moderator did, at one time, post the stats of the amount of content awaiting moderation and the projected wait time, but I haven't seen this for a long time. He probably stopped because of the abuse he was receiving from one particular member. To my knowledge, there is no way to expedite this process unless more moderators are appointed. I'm available if anyone from the site wants to get in touch.
Question for the mods/owners.
Do mods have accounts that post photots?
When submissions are being modded, are those submissions anonymous or does the username appear?
Could it be possible that mods have multiple accounts and accept pro/onlyfan photos?
The top 25 seem to be all OF/PRO material that is found on Reddit with no OF watermarks.
Why would'nt it be obvious that submissions be anonymous. Mods with accounts will just accept their own pro submissions
Its the same group of users that always seem to have their OF submissions accepted.
The only positive thing is that there are other alternatives to this site with bigger content and much more active community and above all fairer moderation team.