Two Babes in one Series

Sometimes two Babes are friends. They take a pic together, it gets posted, and their Series are merged.

When they are equally beautiful, don’t they each deserve their own Series?

In the ideal scenario, this pic could be in two Series at the same time without creating one giant Series.

Short of a redesign of the Series functionality, what is the best way to solve this?

https://whatboyswant.com/babes/non-nude-babes/3941682?c=s-249315

Quote:

Originally posted by Blackpoolmorton

Sometimes two Babes are friends. They take a pic together, it gets posted, and their Series are merged.

When they are equally beautiful, don’t they each deserve their own Series?

In the ideal scenario, this pic could be in two Series at the same time without creating one giant Series.

Short of a redesign of the Series functionality, what is he best way to solve

Yep, it would be handy as this is quite a common issue. You can look at two completely different women and wonder why they are part of the same series, but somewhere amongst a large series of images, there’s probably one of them both together.

How it solve it is a tricky one - definitely one for Diz to think about.

Yeah, overlapping series. Essentially tagging each woman with a unique identifier that sometimes exist in the same picture. Searching on one, the other, or both together yields three resulting series.

Goto "Incorrect series linkage?"

yup both equally stunning and perfect, well photographed, quite possibly filtered, full of themselves, and scantily clad at best. Pics like these are not why I come to WBW.....lol . Pretty much a non issue. WBW is not by any means perfect in the sorting of series. Many times it's just some drunk porn lover at 2 am saying it kinda sorta looks like the same girl and the Mods might miss it. I look at it as finding an onion ring in your French fries, Just enjoy it!!!!