too hard

Quote:

Originally posted by MCR4

Right….

Right, can you give me an example I censored something? I personally don't like censorship in any kind of way, it goes against everything I believe in. Secondly, discussions like this help to understand what kind of problems people encounter or give me another perspective on things. I am but a humble man who makes a lot of mistakes, and I am not the smartest...

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

Holy mother of pixelation
I'd be frustrated too... I've deleted those pics, they are definitely bad quality ones.

Thank you.

Also it seemed it didn't bother many users.

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

... or underage (as she does look questionably aged) but I can't tell for sure.

Yeah, this seems to get more difficult the older you get.
For me the girls just look "young".
It gets harder to tell, if someone looks 17 or 20...

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

Right, can you give me an example I censored something? I personally don't like censorship in any kind of way, it goes against everything I believe in. Secondly, discussions like this help to understand what kind of problems people encounter or give me another perspective on things. I am but a humble man who makes a lot of mistakes, and I am not the smartest...

You censored me by blocking my comments for a week, and some of these threads get locked when you don't want to take the comments criticizing the site or the mods. When the mods let in pics with such bad quality they deserve to be criticized, or keep putting pics of women with cum all over their face or back in the wrong categories. I stopped reporting them because it doesn't seem like you're ever going to find out which of your mods is doing it. Please don't use the excuse omuh used that it must be a 'mis-click'. How long does it take to check what they're doing? How many times have I suggested setting up a separate queue for the underage pics and it still hasn't been done even though some of your mods think its a good idea. As for bad quality, just give them a couple of examples of grainy and blurry pics. Anything worse and they get rejected. It would keep the complaints about pics being rejected and later uploaded by someone else. As long as your mods don't have some kind of standardization of what is acceptable and what gets rejected you're going to keep getting complaints. And please tell sentinel to stop saying how many 'hundreds' of users upload everyday. I've been kind of keeping track and checking back, and I will bet you can't find even 10 days in the last 5 years when you had 100 users upload pics. Your average is running between 40 to 60 at most and the days with 60 a few and far between.

Quote:

Originally posted by strictguy

And please tell sentinel to stop saying how many 'hundreds' of users upload everyday. I've been kind of keeping track and checking back, and I will bet you can't find even 10 days in the last 5 years when you had 100 users upload pics. Your average is running between 40 to 60 at most and the days with 60 a few and far between.

Show me where I said hundreds of users upload EVERY DAY. Oh yeah, that’s right, I didn’t.

To save you time, my actual quote was:

“the two largest image sections currently are “non-nude” and “beach/bikini” - again, this is all content uploaded by hundreds of users (that clearly like those images).”

This is on page 2 of this very thread.

So I wasn’t suggesting there were hundreds of uploaders on a daily basis; but are there hundreds of users that upload image on a semi regular basis? Sure there are.

And my point remains that the two largest galleries (in terms of number images uploaded) just happen to be the two that you have major issues with (non-nude and beach/bikini). SHOCK. So of course you shoot your mouth off about it constantly. I’ve never known someone moan so much about something they are using FOR FREE and BY CHOICE.

Quote:

Originally posted by strictguy

You censored me by blocking my comments for a week, and some of these threads get locked when you don't want to take the comments criticizing the site or the mods. When the mods let in pics with such bad quality they deserve to be criticized, or keep putting pics of women with cum all over their face or back in the wrong categories. I stopped reporting them because it doesn't seem like you're ever going to find out which of your mods is doing it. Please don't use the excuse omuh used that it must be a 'mis-click'. How long does it take to check what they're doing? How many times have I suggested setting up a separate queue for the underage pics and it still hasn't been done even though some of your mods think its a good idea. As for bad quality, just give them a couple of examples of grainy and blurry pics. Anything worse and they get rejected. It would keep the complaints about pics being rejected and later uploaded by someone else. As long as your mods don't have some kind of standardization of what is acceptable and what gets rejected you're going to keep getting complaints. And please tell sentinel to stop saying how many 'hundreds' of users upload everyday. I've been kind of keeping track and checking back, and I will bet you can't find even 10 days in the last 5 years when you had 100 users upload pics. Your average is running between 40 to 60 at most and the days with 60 a few and far between.

Sometimes I feel like I am talking with a kid. Your posting rights got taken because you went off-topic on a topic I told you multiple of times NOT todo. You could have started a new topic or contributed to the topic in a productive way. But somehow you always go out of your way to make things up and make things bigger than they are. From now on I will call you our WBW Karen. (maybe I even going to add a badge to your account with "Karen" status).

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

Sometimes I feel like I am talking with a kid. Your posting rights got taken because you went off-topic on a topic I told you multiple of times NOT todo. You could have started a new topic or contributed to the topic in a productive way. But somehow you always go out of your way to make things up and make things bigger than they are. From now on I will call you our WBW Karen. (maybe I even going to add a badge to your account with "Karen" status).

And you still can't address the issues can you? Tell you what, the only thing amateur about this site is the way it's run and the mods you protect.
What isn't productive about a separate queue for the underage so you'd get a consensus instead of one mod accepting a pic that another mod had already rejected?
What about a few example photos for the mods to use as comparison for bad quality photos? At least there might be some constancy then.
Why do you keep users as members who haven't logged on for years? Maybe because it would show the low number of actual users you have.
How about this issue: User #1 uploads a pic and its rejected as underage. A week later user #2 uploads the same pic, and its accepted by a different mod.
User #1 reports the pic as being rejected before. Now what happens to the penalty points user #1 got for the first upload? Are the removed, or is the user stuck with them? What about user #2, do they also get slammed with the penalty points? Does user one get credit for reporting a photo they originally uploaded? I've basically asked these questions several times before and never gotten an answer. Its always "that has been answered many times before". If so, please point it out! By the way, take your Karen comment and shove it up your ass. and I'm sure you'll take my posting rights away again for that comment since you and your mods can't stand any kind of criticism!

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Sentinel

Show me where I said hundreds of users upload EVERY DAY. Oh yeah, that’s right, I didn’t.

To save you time, my actual quote was:

“the two largest image sections currently are “non-nude” and “beach/bikini” - again, this is all content uploaded by hundreds of users (that clearly like those images).”

This is on page 2 of this very thread.

So I wasn’t suggesting there were hundreds of uploaders on a daily basis; but are there hundreds of users that upload image on a semi regular basis? Sure there are.

And my point remains that the two largest galleries (in terms of number images uploaded) just happen to be the two that you have major issues with (non-nude and beach/bikini). SHOCK. So of course you shoot your mouth off about it constantly. I’ve never known someone moan so much about something they are using FOR FREE and BY CHOICE.

I'll just pick and choose little bits just like you do all the time!

"uploaded by hundreds of users"

It can be taken in different ways, can't it? And of course you're going to protect the non-nude and bikini/beach sections because that's where 99% of your uploads go, along with most of the stuff in your many, many threads, which you work so diligently on instead of moderating user photos!

Quote:

Originally posted by strictguy

I'll just pick and choose little bits just like you do all the time!

"uploaded by hundreds of users"

It can be taken in different ways, can't it? And of course you're going to protect the non-nude and bikini/beach sections because that's where 99% of your uploads go, along with most of the stuff in your many, many threads, which you work so diligently on instead of moderating user photos!

The quote can be taken in different ways if you ADD words to it, as you did in this case by claiming I said "DAILY", which I think we can all see I did not.

Anyway, you're boring me now. You're the WBW resident toddler - loves to moan about fuck all, never happy unless he's got his panties in a bunch and generally just annoys everyone around him. A wise man (multiple, actually) once advised me to ignore you - you're an oxygen thief who thrives on attention, and there's no reasoning with you as your mind is already on the next (often fabricated) complaint.

So that's what I will do, no more interacting with you (you'll be please I'm sure), and hopefully the threads can get back on track to what they were about, which is respectful people trying to improve the site. Our arguing doesn't help anything.

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Sentinel

The quote can be taken in different ways if you ADD words to it, as you did in this case by claiming I said "DAILY", which I think we can all see I did not.

Anyway, you're boring me now. You're the WBW resident toddler - loves to moan about fuck all, never happy unless he's got his panties in a bunch and generally just annoys everyone around him. A wise man (multiple, actually) once advised me to ignore you - you're an oxygen thief who thrives on attention, and there's no reasoning with you as your mind is already on the next (often fabricated) complaint.

So that's what I will do, no more interacting with you (you'll be please I'm sure), and hopefully the threads can get back on track to what they were about, which is respectful people trying to improve the site. Our arguing doesn't help anything.

Please show me where I added the word 'daily' to your comment? Can't can you? Talk about fabricating, you're the king of that.
You are the biggest "ATTENTION WHORE" on this site with all your lousy threads and making sure you reply to any comment made on these threads. This place ran really well before you got here, and it will run much better if you would just leave!

so much negativity around, instead of enjoying wonderful (more or less) naked women just for free...

Quote:

Originally posted by karenware

you kidding? _______Best SPaM Thread EvER______

Username checks out

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

Right, can you give me an example I censored something? I personally don't like censorship in any kind of way, it goes against everything I believe in. Secondly, discussions like this help to understand what kind of problems people encounter or give me another perspective on things. I am but a humble man who makes a lot of mistakes, and I am not the smartest...

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

Right, can you give me an example I censored something? I personally don't like censorship in any kind of way, it goes against everything I believe in. Secondly, discussions like this help to understand what kind of problems people encounter or give me another perspective on things. I am but a humble man who makes a lot of mistakes, and I am not the smartest...

Yeah… if I could they wouldn’t be censored.
It’s all good. It’s your website and you can make any rules you want. You can govern people right out of subscribing

Quote:

Originally posted by MCR4

Yeah… if I could they wouldn’t be censored.
It’s all good. It’s your website and you can make any rules you want. You can govern people right out of subscribing

Sorry you feel this way. I don't know what I did what made you feel this way.

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

Sorry you feel this way. I don't know what I did what made you feel this way.

Start with your card processing company who charged 2X for my subscription then started selling my info and changing me for 200 dollars at laundromats in random ass locations across the USA.

Quote:

Originally posted by MCR4

Start with your card processing company who charged 2X for my subscription then started selling my info and changing me for 200 dollars at laundromats in random ass locations across the USA.

I've been making payment to this site by Credit Card for 17 years and have never had ANYTHING untoward occur.
The first thing I thought of when I read this is why would a payment to a site in the Netherlands end up causing charges only in the US?
Wouldn't it be more likely to be happening in Europe if that were the case?

I guess if there was some kind of breach of a card processor a card number could be sold anywhere.

Quote:

Originally posted by MCR4

Start with your card processing company who charged 2X for my subscription then started selling my info and changing me for 200 dollars at laundromats in random ass locations across the USA.

These are pretty heavy claims.

First if you got charged 2 times, you could have contacted us with your double charge and we would have refunded it without any question asked.

Secondly claiming that virtualxs.com (a dutch company) is selling your information and/or credit card information is highly impossible. Our laws are pretty heavy on privacy and reselling of information. I will be reporting this claims to them and will be contacting the cyber crime unit of the KLPD (dutch police department) to investigate.

Quote:

Originally posted by MCR4

Start with your card processing company who charged 2X for my subscription then started selling my info and changing me for 200 dollars at laundromats in random ass locations across the USA.

Got a message back from the PSP (Payment Service Provider - virtualxs), they have investigated your issue, there are no double charges made on your card. They are willing to expend the investigation towards your bank/credit-card provider and start a fraud investigation. I also contacted our contact at the KLPD Cyber Crime unit (Yes, we work with them to combat child porn and abuse) and they will get back to me.