Score: 0.00 Votes: 0
rate this

Some suggestions for some new photo tags

Starter: BlankVerse Posted: 16 years ago Views: 661
#4236800
Lvl 15
I have a few suggestions for new photo tags for whatboyswant.com:

gender - group of females (for more than three)

bodytype - tall, short

clothing - minidress, prom or formalwear, halter or haltertop,
nipples-showing, catsuit, camisole

eyes - eyes-closed

hair - hair-weave or hair-extensions

event - prom, party [whoops - that's under environment, along with
wedding (why?)]

environment - nightclub [you've got 'club', but I think of a club as the
Girl Scouts ;-)]

sports - cheerleader, ice skating, gymnastics, sports-other (for
example, I recently found one track and field photo and one indoor
volleyball photo on whatboyswant.com)


...and I don't know what category to put it under (maybe Persons ?), but
something to cover workers on the job such as waitresses, female
bartenders, etc. I would have thought that 'Uniform' would be a good
substitute, but almost all of the photos with that tag are costumes.
#4236801
Lvl 26
Holy shit mate. You know there's only like 3% of tagged photos on this site. I like the idea of adding more options for tags but I think all it's going to do is slow up the process of getting them all tagged even more.
#4236802
Lvl 15
I'm new to the website, so I'm just learning.

My idea was that the more useful you make the tags, the more people will search on tags and maybe even add some tags themself.


On a side note: I don't know how they've selected the tags that are there so far, but some of them are rather obscure and seem to lead to mistagging. For example: bodytype - gape, and environment - solarium. Also: Sports - cricket has no photos with that tag and seems unnecessary.
#4236803
Lvl 26
I see your point but there's very few people on here that actually tag photos. I tag as many as I can but I don't take the time to put 30 tags on each photo. I think it's best to put maybe 6-10 of the most common tags people search for like hair color, tit size, naked, bottomless, topless, things like that. Anything beyond that common stuff will probably be searched for by like 1% of the people on here.
#4236804
Lvl 26
We have the tags , foursome, group and orgy for cases of more than 3 girls, as this isnt a site for men, it should suffice in the majority of cases.
in the others more than one tag is needed ie prom + dress, nipples-hard + tshirt, group + nonude.

personally id prefer a new tag of 'silent' for when tagging movies.

and Thamuz its 4.5% tagged now Yippee!!!
#4236805
Lvl 20
halter, camisole and all that falls under "tanktop". I know it's not perfect but if we started breaking down clothing by the actual perfect item description it would make tagging impossible. Most people couldn't even tell you the difference between a tanktop, halter, camisole. We're not a clothing site so getting that detailed would only hinder and screw up the search.

I agree on "group of females" though. Sometimes there's 20 of em in a pic together.
#4236806
Lvl 15
Another whoops. I just found cheerleader under clothing (instead of my suggestion under sports).
#4236807
bodytype - tall, short <-- I think that's been brought up before and was shot down because it's almost impossible to tell from most photos how tall someone is.
#4236808
Lvl 59
The word "group" is a tag that can be used for some of the situations described above.
#4236809
Lvl 19
There is "tan" (and I love tan chicks), so can "pale" be added (I also love pale chicks)?