Pedo invasion.

Bangledeshs signature reads;

Pic Mod's Rules for Acceptance:
Subject > 16yo = NON-Naked (clothes, bikini, upskirts, tight pants, etc)
Subject > 18yo = Naked (nipples, breasts, bare ass, etc)

Is is just me, or is looking at 16yo girls in bikinis still wrong? I know they are clothed, and I know there is nothing illegal about it, but why are you looking at them? If you are looking at them in a sexual way, that makes you a PEDO. Am I right?

There have been a load of nude posts that have had to be deleted or removed because they look under age, people have even been banned. Most people agree that this is wrong, but some still post 'well I thought she looked 18' pictures, that they then have to delete.

The point I am trying to make is ... I have problems with people who post any underage pic. Clothed or not, you are still lusting after little girls.

Does anyone agree with me, or am I the only one?

Androphilia is a young girl attracted to older men.
Hebephilia is the attraction to girls/women between 12 and 25
Pedophilia is the attraction to girls under 12.

You only seem to see it as lust or nothing. If you go to a museum there are many paintings of girls of all ages nude. Most magazines you see such as cosmopolitan etc the models are around 16 or 17 years old. One can look at a clothed or unclothed women under 18 and find beauty in the human form. Appreciation and lust can be mutually exclusive. Lindsay Lohan Hillary Duff and Britney Spears have become American icons and men and women adore, appreciate and yes even some lust and they all became famous between 16 and 17 years old.

It is not surprising that a 18 yo looks better than a 30 year old. Age takes its toll. At 17 or 18 a women is as "flawless" as shes ever gonna be.

16 or 17 is not a child. Of course Im not suggesting that there old enough to do anything our legislators set that age. Some elected officials say 16 some say 18 but appreciating their beauty is not illegal or immoral.

Finally, often times men and women look at younger women because their youth and innocence reminds them of their own youth and innocence.

Im not taking any position for or against Im pointing out that the as a matter of freedom of expression and American society it is not one or two guys here, its our society as a whole which values youth and beauty. Watch any episode on MTV, such as room raiders or Fear Factor, all the reality shows - everyone is young and beautiful. Type in teen on google. How many hits...ill do it ...ok for a web search 114,000,000, for an image search 1,140,000. I typed milf and got 251,000 image hits. The number of sites are like a poll. If there wasnt the demand there wouldnt be such a supply. We shouldnt date 17 yo's not because its physically dangerous but because there not mature enough to deal with having relationships with older more experienced and some bad intentioned guys (or girls). But that doesnt mean they cant be admired.

so sure I dont wanna see nor the do the mods wanna see pics of clothed children. Pics of a 17 yo who is a star (lindsay/hillary) o well thats ok but not somone who no one knows?? Not sensical.

Quote:

Is is just me, or is looking at 16yo girls in bikinis still wrong?

It's just you.

Quote:

I know they are clothed, and I know there is nothing illegal about it, but why are you looking at them? If you are looking at them in a sexual way, that makes you a PEDO. Am I right?

No, you're not right. Or it might depend on what country you live in if you want to think it that way. In Finland you can fuck a 16 y-o girl legally. And I personally see no harm in it unless the age-difference is BIG. I'm soon 21 and I don't consider myself a pedophile when I look at a picture of a beautiful 16 y-o girl.
And still looking at a pic of a clothed girl is quite different than a nude pic or dreaming to have sex with the girl and so on.

Quote:

There have been a load of nude posts that have had to be deleted or removed because they look under age, people have even been banned. Most people agree that this is wrong, but some still post 'well I thought she looked 18' pictures, that they then have to delete.

The point I am trying to make is ... I have problems with people who post any underage pic. Clothed or not, you are still lusting after little girls.

This is sad but true.
We do our best to keep the nude pics of underaged girls away from here, but sometimes people post such stuff and it might be in the forum for even hours if no mod is online. But usually such pictures disappear from the forum quicker than most of you guys even notice it
And the "report this post" button has proved to be quite handy!

And what it comes to the pics of clothed 16 year+ old girls, I believe most of us who look at them pics do not "öust" over the girl. Atleast the older ones from us who have 5+ years more age than the girl.
It's more like the fact that we just want to see a pic of a pretty girl, that's all.
And you have to admit, a 16 year-old girl these days is not exactly a "kid" anymore...
And if I would be 18 myself, I'd go after 16 y-o girls pretty easily.
Is it really so big difference if you are 18 and the girl 16 than if you are 20 and the girl 18? I think not...

And the 16 y-o's in modern days are mostly very mature both physocally and mentally.
I've talked to several people who have been around 16 and 17 and I've thought them to be about my age in both aspects!

But the point being, it's much of the way how you look at the pic.
If a say 30-40 year-old guy would be looking at a pic of a 16 y-o girl and thinking "what would she look naked and I'd like to fuck that girl so much" then I consider it to be a bit odd, but if he would think "now that's a pretty girl" then I see mno harm in it... The crucial point is the nintention IMHO. And based on that, we are not going to deny the joy of pretty girls from the John Average because some small percentae of weirdos look at the few underage pics "the wrong way".

And the difference between 16 and 18 years is not so big nowadays...

Hope this explains something

Wow, wit_ is gonna be our next Jeff

in NYC you can have sexwith a 17 yr old.

If a girl that is 16 has the body of a woman it is not wrong to get turned on by that. just my opinion.

also you need to realise ther are 18 yr old guys on here or maybe younger...so they would like to see those girls.

I do not condone child porn at all in any way shape or form.

these are images youwill see at your local beach or neighborhood in the street.

There are people on this site who try and post all kinds of sick crap. I don't think a pic of some 16 or 17yo slut wearing Daisy Dukes is a big deal. Oh by the way damn you wit.

Child porn is fucked up and wrong. However there are a wide variety of ages on here...some 18 y/o dude probably doesn't want to look at 30-40 y/o women. Are you seriously going to say that there is a huge difference between 17 and 18? I sure don't remember there being any difference except that I was able to buy smokes on my own. In fact I married a chick when she was 16..and I'm not on welfare with 10 kids. I sure as hell know I'm not a pedo. My wife and I are two years apart. So are you saying that I'm some sort of sick fuck for marrying my high school sweet heart? I don't in anyway condone the exploitation of young girls, or think anybody should be posting nudes of underage girls..but because some young guy looks at older teen girls (Lindsay Lohan, Hillary Duff) doesn't make him a pedo.

@Tea- In Briton 16 is legal for nudity, as long as the girl has permision from a legal Guardian. Lindsay Dawn Mackenzie appeared topless in The Daily Sport on her 16th birthday.
I have to say your post is a bit hysterical.

oh, and people shouldn't confuse age of consent with nudity laws,the two are completely separate and shouldn't be confused!

*typo corrected for mr witler*

Who the hell is "agent of consent"?

a link to answer your question mr wit
http://www.avert.org/aofconsent.htm

So you really didn't spot that typo on your message?

it's one eleven in the morning for gawd sake, i'm barely literate when i'm fully awake.

If there's grass on the field, play ball.

Just messing with you laddie

You know I love you, I only do this to get you angry

Wit_ 's leg.

Quote:

Originally posted by Seryano

If there's grass on the field, play ball.

Word

i say 16 or 60, if she's hot she's hot.

Wow I had no idea the average age of consent is 16. Even in the U.S. there a lot of states w 16 as the age of consent. Wow given that our old conservative law makers are saying ok to 16 how can anyone complain of a 16 year old in a bathing suit?? I did forget the whole page 3 thing. Samantha Fox and lindsay dawn mckenzie both were 16 and appeared in the newspaper on page 3 topless...in the newspaper!!!! So does that mean the british are all pedos. hmmm does Pedo invasion really mean "the red coats are coming, the red coats are coming!!!" lol I dont think so.

I was 26 when I got together with my gf, and she was 2 weeks before her 18th birthday. Of course, a lot of people started talking behind my back, but its just what people do. Most people tend to hold themselves to a high moral standard, at least to the outside world. As soon as its about them and not someone else, its all different. Now, even after two years, I still get wierd looks. No one seems to notice the fact that we are still together, I mean she's almost 20 now, we are practically engaged and all anyone remembers is that she was 17. Was, not is. Now, if I ask you guys, does that make me a pedo (or a hebe?). Or does it make me a smart, happy man? Ok, dont really know about smart, but yeah, I am happy.