Increase upload number

Hey, I'd like to increase the amount of pics I can upload. 50 seems to be too little, so is it possible to upload more at a time?

Quote:

Originally posted by ludonja7

Hey, I'd like to increase the amount of pics I can upload. 50 seems to be too little, so is it possible to upload more at a time?

Upload is based on how much is accepted. You start with set amount and will increase or decreased on the amount that is accepted or denied.

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

Upload is based on how much is accepted. You start with set amount and will increase or decreased on the amount that is accepted or denied.

Ok, I get it. Thank you for answering.

I won't bother uploading anymore as nearly every picture comes up as photoshoped..even ones I know are not.

Quote:

Originally posted by Teensandcocks

I won't bother uploading anymore as nearly every picture comes up as photoshoped..even ones I know are not.

Sorry to hear you feel that way. You have a 70% upload success rate, which is actually quite good. Unfortunately there is no way of you knowing for sure that an image hasn't been altered (assume this is the rejection reason you get) unless you took the photo yourself. As ever, if you feel particularly aggrieved by a rejection decision, you can get in touch with any of the mods here and they can review it for you.

Don't feel so bad. I feel like 50% of mine are rejected as celebrity even though a lot of them are different pictures of girls that are already on this site. My upload limit got up to 250 and I can't seem to get past that for probably a year now. Last time I looked, I think my score dropped by a few points. Pretty sure I'll never make it up there. It's very discouraging.

I think it's actually very unfair to think that we'd possibly know every picture they call a celebrity, duplicate, photoshopped is in fact a celebrity, duplicate, photoshopped so the punishment by removing points is very discouraging. I used to upload to try and climb the ranks. I've slowed down a lot and now I just get in the mood once and a while when I'm bored.

Quote:

Originally posted by Thamuz

Don't feel so bad. I feel like 50% of mine are rejected as celebrity even though a lot of them are different pictures of girls that are already on this site. My upload limit got up to 250 and I can't seem to get past that for probably a year now. Last time I looked, I think my score dropped by a few points. Pretty sure I'll never make it up there. It's very discouraging.

I think it's actually very unfair to think that we'd possibly know every picture they call a celebrity, duplicate, photoshopped is in fact a celebrity, duplicate, photoshopped so the punishment by removing points is very discouraging. I used to upload to try and climb the ranks. I've slowed down a lot and now I just get in the mood once and a while when I'm bored.

Diz will be able to clear this up properly but it is my understanding that photos rejected for being a duplicate or altered/photoshopped don't actually affect your upload score that much compared to those that have a website address on it or are professional/celebrities. Images that are rejected for being extreme or underage affect your user upload score the most.

My upload amount has been at 250 for ages now. I think most of my rejections for being professional are simply because I don't know who the girl is but you just have to roll with the punches. With my moderator hat on, you wouldn't believe the amount of Miley Cyrus (for example) images I've had to reject etc. and some users consistently upload images that are clearly from porn sites. There has to be a punishment of sorts otherwise the queue would be full of them and this simply delays the decent images from being accepted.

If your queue limit is 250 and you are consistently uploading images that are accepted, your limit should increase eventually. You can keep tabs on your rejections via your queue log (found in the same place you upload new images) and if any stick out as being unfair then just let me or another moderator know - we can look into it and reverse the decision if we find it to be wrong.

I agree with Thamuz on this for the same reasons and why I don't upload anymore. I'd like to know what the criteria is for rejecting a photo as a celebrity? I can understand if its Miley Cyrus or Kate Upton, but why are other pics of the same girl that are already uploaded here being rejected as celebrity? There seems to be no rhyme nor reason for some of it. If you look at some of the series, there are hundreds of photos uploaded by as many as 7 or 8 different members, so we know they're coming from different websites. Also seeing quite a few more reposts/duplicates since the site was upgraded.

Quote:

Originally posted by strictguy

I agree with Thamuz on this for the same reasons and why I don't upload anymore. I'd like to know what the criteria is for rejecting a photo as a celebrity? I can understand if its Miley Cyrus or Kate Upton, but why are other pics of the same girl that are already uploaded here being rejected as celebrity? There seems to be no rhyme nor reason for some of it. If you look at some of the series, there are hundreds of photos uploaded by as many as 7 or 8 different members, so we know they're coming from different websites. Also seeing quite a few more reposts/duplicates since the site was upgraded.

This one is tricky to police even from a moderator perspective as there aren't black and white rules as to what classifies as a celebrity. You could class Instagram "models" as celebrities these days but then where do you draw the line? If they have 500k followers do they hit celebrity status? Or does it have to be 1m? As with things such as "image quality" or "under age", it comes down to the moderator's opinion. It's not ideal but it's the system that's in place so we make it work the best we can.

If you have an upload rejected for being a celebrity and you know there are other images of the same woman on the site - let me or another moderator know because either your image should be accepted, or the rest of the set should be removed.

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Sentinel

Diz will be able to clear this up properly but it is my understanding that photos rejected for being a duplicate or altered/photoshopped don't actually affect your upload score that much compared to those that have a website address on it or are professional/celebrities. Images that are rejected for being extreme or underage affect your user upload score the most.

My upload amount has been at 250 for ages now. I think most of my rejections for being professional are simply because I don't know who the girl is but you just have to roll with the punches. With my moderator hat on, you wouldn't believe the amount of Miley Cyrus (for example) images I've had to reject etc. and some users consistently upload images that are clearly from porn sites. There has to be a punishment of sorts otherwise the queue would be full of them and this simply delays the decent images from being accepted.

If your queue limit is 250 and you are consistently uploading images that are accepted, your limit should increase eventually. You can keep tabs on your rejections via your queue log (found in the same place you upload new images) and if any stick out as being unfair then just let me or another moderator know - we can look into it and reverse the decision if we find it to be wrong.

I get it. I definitely agree with the extreme and underage being punished by point reduction. Not necessarily celebrity/model though. Take a look at my rejection list the last few weeks. It's probably 99% celebrity/model. I've never had anywhere near that high of a rejection list in one single category. Many of those girls are even on this site now so I'd understand if they were duplicates and I didn't see them.

What constitutes a celebrity/model anyways? Professional photographs? Cam girls? I mean I don't upload any obvious celebrities. Maybe there's cam girls in there. Who would know all of them? Some of mine rejected as celebrity aren't even well shot or professional looking photos at all. Just seems odd that so many are all marked with that one rejection these days. Almost feels like someone is just trying to blow through the queue as fast as possible so they're not putting much thought into it.

I've been on and off this site for over a decade now so I'm very familiar with uploading and the rejection that comes with it. I've always done my best to roll with it. I just think it's unfair to punish people with removing points because they uploaded a cam girl that no one knows and that gets flagged as a celebrity. Maybe I'm wrong.....

I know diz and all you mods do a great job here. It can't be easy staring at some of these photos every single day and deciding what's appropriate and what's not. So thank you for that.

Here's one example. Both the top ones, I can't figure out for the life of me who in the world could determine that these are celebrities or models. It's possible that these two exact pictures have come into question before so someone just already knew. The bottom right is the same but that one does look more professionally done. Bottom left at least shows the face so I won't argue that one at all.

Regardless, I don't think there should be a punishment for accidently uploading cam girls or snapchat girls. I get the celebrity one but that should be separate. Everyone should know if they're uploading an actual celebrity or not so there's no excuse there.

[reply=Thamuz][/reply]

Quote:

Originally posted by Thamuz

Here's one example. Both the top ones, I can't figure out for the life of me who in the world could determine that these are celebrities or models. It's possible that these two exact pictures have come into question before so someone just already knew. The bottom right is the same but that one does look more professionally done. Bottom left at least shows the face so I won't argue that one at all.

Regardless, I don't think there should be a punishment for accidently uploading cam girls or snapchat girls. I get the celebrity one but that should be separate. Everyone should know if they're uploading an actual celebrity or not so there's no excuse there.

The process of determining a model generally comes from a reverse image search. So for me, if I think an image looks very professionally done, I’ll reverse search it and see why the results are. If it clearly shows that the image is of “Joanna Bloggs” and that she’s a professional model, I’ll reject the image. If no name pops up then I’ll let it through. That’s my process for the ones I don’t recognise as being celebs/models.

I do agree with you that Instagram girls and cam girls, not everyone (including me) is going to know who is classed as famous and who isn’t. Moderators have the option to select “other” as the rejection reason, which I don’t believe affects the users score. This is what I tend to select for those images that need rejecting but where I don’t feel the uploader should be punished.

allways good to remember:

User score, upload limit and priority :
- each member will have a user score to rate the quality of his uploads which is calculated as follows : 100 - round(penalty_point / number_of_uploads * 100)
- everytime a picture is rejected, the member will get penalty points as follow :

Quote:
Duplicate: 0
Watermarked: 2
Pro: 2
Under aged: 4
Gross/Extreme: 1
Bad Quality: 1
Altered/Photoshopped: 1
Other: 0



- depending on the user score, members will change Group. The lower the group, the higher the priority their upload will get in the queue and the higher their number of upload allowed will be, as follows :

Quote:
New users will have a limit of 100 until they reach 100 uploads. Then the user score kicks in.
Group 1: score 90 to 100 - queue limit: 1000
Group 2: score 70 to 89 - queue limit: 500
Group 3: score 50 to 69 - queue limit: 250
Group 4: score 40 to 49 - queue limit: 100
Group 5: score 20 to 39 - queue limit: 50
Group 6: score 0 to 19 - queue limit 25

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Sentinel

The process of determining a model generally comes from a reverse image search. So for me, if I think an image looks very professionally done, I’ll reverse search it and see why the results are. If it clearly shows that the image is of “Joanna Bloggs” and that she’s a professional model, I’ll reject the image. If no name pops up then I’ll let it through. That’s my process for the ones I don’t recognise as being celebs/models.

I do agree with you that Instagram girls and cam girls, not everyone (including me) is going to know who is classed as famous and who isn’t. Moderators have the option to select “other” as the rejection reason, which I don’t believe affects the users score. This is what I tend to select for those images that need rejecting but where I don’t feel the uploader should be punished.

But this statement doesn't explain why on your posts a girl has been accepted but the same girl for me has been accepted and rejected as a model. She isn't a model and never has been. It would be reasonable and rational that if you can't put a name to the lady then quite simply she isn't a model. As a photographer myself if I'm posting a picture online I copyright my material so that it can't be used by anyone else. Anyone can undertake this simple procedure. If there is no such annotation then it's open season and it can be published and used anywhere.

Haha I guess I just keep getting that mod that thinks I should be punished then. I still think you guys have somebody out there that's being a little willy nilly with their rejections. I actually do reverse image searches on my pictures sometimes just because I'll find a girl that I think is absolutely stunning and I'll want to see if there's anymore out there. It rarely ever works. Especially on pictures with no face. I find it very very hard to believe that you could reverse image search every one of my latest rejections as celebrity and find a name for every single one of them. But if you say that's what happened then that's what we'll go with. I also still don't believe it's right to take away points for cam girls or social media girls. Just my opinion though.

Quote:

Originally posted by The_Sentinel

The process of determining a model generally comes from a reverse image search. So for me, if I think an image looks very professionally done, I’ll reverse search it and see why the results are. If it clearly shows that the image is of “Joanna Bloggs” and that she’s a professional model, I’ll reject the image. If no name pops up then I’ll let it through. That’s my process for the ones I don’t recognise as being celebs/models.

I do agree with you that Instagram girls and cam girls, not everyone (including me) is going to know who is classed as famous and who isn’t. Moderators have the option to select “other” as the rejection reason, which I don’t believe affects the users score. This is what I tend to select for those images that need rejecting but where I don’t feel the uploader should be punished.

So what you're saying is if you find a girl's name on her photos she's a celebrity? I can understand if she has a pay site for her pics, but if they're free what difference does it make? Also just because she has 'X' number of followers anywhere shouldn't blacklist her from this site should it? Almost all of my pics rejected where for being "celebrity/model" or "other", that's why I no longer post/upload anything here. Its a waste of my time to do the reverse image search and then have the photos rejected on the whim of a moderator.

Quote:

Originally posted by strictguy

So what you're saying is if you find a girl's name on her photos she's a celebrity? I can understand if she has a pay site for her pics, but if they're free what difference does it make? Also just because she has 'X' number of followers anywhere shouldn't blacklist her from this site should it? Almost all of my pics rejected where for being "celebrity/model" or "other", that's why I no longer post/upload anything here. Its a waste of my time to do the reverse image search and then have the photos rejected on the whim of a moderator.

I understand why they don't want pictures of girls from pay sites. I remember seeing people talk about this many year ago. I don't know if there's any actually legal issues with it but a lot of the girls end up seeing their pictures on here and are able to force the mods here to remove them. Usually these pics are copywrite, I believe. It's to easy to crop the watermark off and try and act like it's original. No harm to the uploader but I can see it potentially being a problem for the site owner, maybe even the mods.

Again, my point isn't that they should allow it. Just that we shouldn't be punished for it. I'm very careful about the pictures that I upload. I triple check them for watermarks and make sure I don't recognize them as a pro. So when over half of them get marked as celebrity, it feels like a kick in the teeth.

Quote:

Originally posted by darkstar001

But this statement doesn't explain why on your posts a girl has been accepted but the same girl for me has been accepted and rejected as a model. She isn't a model and never has been. It would be reasonable and rational that if you can't put a name to the lady then quite simply she isn't a model. As a photographer myself if I'm posting a picture online I copyright my material so that it can't be used by anyone else. Anyone can undertake this simple procedure. If there is no such annotation then it's open season and it can be published and used anywhere.

Because if a “moderator A” checks my uploads and thinks that “girl A” is NOT a model, this doesn’t stop “moderator B” checking your uploads and seeing the same girl (girl A), does a reverse image search and finds she has these photos on OnlyFans (for example). These aren’t allowed so will be rejected.

This is what I mean about issues like this. You should just send me/any mod a message politely asking to look into this, as you’re right, it’s not fair.

Quote:

Originally posted by Thamuz

Haha I guess I just keep getting that mod that thinks I should be punished then. I still think you guys have somebody out there that's being a little willy nilly with their rejections. I actually do reverse image searches on my pictures sometimes just because I'll find a girl that I think is absolutely stunning and I'll want to see if there's anymore out there. It rarely ever works. Especially on pictures with no face. I find it very very hard to believe that you could reverse image search every one of my latest rejections as celebrity and find a name for every single one of them. But if you say that's what happened then that's what we'll go with. I also still don't believe it's right to take away points for cam girls or social media girls. Just my opinion though.

I agree with you re: social media girls. They are putting their images out there on free sites like Instagram, Facebook etc so I would imagine they should be fair game. It’s when they also have their images on paid-for websites (like OnlyFans) where issues can arise.

As for your comment about a moderator being willy nilly with their rejections, this could also be true but unless you bring this to the attention of the mods or Diz, how can this be checked?

Most mods here want the site to run smoothly and to have an easy life with no hassle - we’re not trying to make life hard for members or annoy them. So a simple message to me saying “could you please check a couple of my recent rejections for me as I believe they should have been accepted” will be met by a helpful reply. I’m not going to tell you to piss off etc. 😂 The chances are I may have rejected them myself and can explain why (or amend my mistake) or if I can’t see why the image was rejected by another mod, it can be reversed. I have already done this a few times for other members. (Obviously if every member enquires about every single rejection then this will slow the process up significantly).

Also please don’t think that the mods feel the system we have is perfect. There really isn’t a “perfect” way to moderate such a wide variety of images that make their way onto the queue, mistake will be made and individual opinions will differ. But communication is key here so just get in touch with us and we’ll try to help.