Bad Quality?

Here is one of the photos, labeled bad quality. What makes this photo bad quality? So I know next time I am not wasting your time or mine by uploading

Unsure, tbh. Some of mine were rejected due to bad or poor quality, though their image dimensions / size were better than some I've paid credits to download. I suspect it's automation software and some setting just got it flagged for "quality."

This is all purely speculation on my behalf - I speak with no position of insight or authority.

@dennis2377
https://whatboyswant.com/user/dennis2377

Can you help and explain? Just tryin to understand

Quote:

Originally posted by swooshjr

Here is one of the photos, labeled bad quality. What makes this photo bad quality? So I know next time I am not wasting your time or mine by uploading

No idea why those were marked as bad quality as they indeed aren't. I've put those back in the queue.

Quote:

Originally posted by Strykerwhitehrs

Unsure, tbh. Some of mine were rejected due to bad or poor quality, though their image dimensions / size were better than some I've paid credits to download. I suspect it's automation software and some setting just got it flagged for "quality."

This is all purely speculation on my behalf - I speak with no position of insight or authority.

The quality apreciation isn't automated. The size format is, to ensure the pics aren't too small, but mods are the ones gauging if a pic is good enough quality or not. A pic that has a big size doesn't mean it's good quality though. You can have a huge picture, but if it's all pixelated or blury, it will be marked as bad quality.
Although I checked your log and only saw one marked as "bad quality" but again, it doesn't really seem to be, so I've put it back in queue as well.

Keep in mind quality is a bit subjective to judge : while some pics are clearly good quality (super high definition etc.) and others are clearly bad (completely blury, pixelated etc.), others can be a bit on the fence (a bit blury but not that bad) and then it kinda comes down to the mod appreciation. However, in both your cases, I don't really see how that could have been seen as bad quality as both your pics were pretty clear and not on the fence...

I've had several rejected for bad quality,yes a few were baddie to transfer from one phone to another but a few were not. Then some for other reasons. I don't understand the process but oh well

Quote:

Originally posted by Cutter186

I've had several rejected for bad quality,yes a few were baddie to transfer from one phone to another but a few were not. Then some for other reasons. I don't understand the process but oh well

Looking at your logs, the few rejected as bad quality were indeed blury pics so it was justified.
As for the many rejected as "other" it's because they have no erotic/porn value, those are just normal selfies of a completely clothed woman so they don't really belong here.

Definitely bad quality; the Moderator got it right. This should not have been reinstated. It's a photo of a fat arse from the rear that shows nothing.

Quote:

Originally posted by Calicojoe007

Definitely bad quality; the Moderator got it right. This should not have been reinstated. It's a photo of a fat arse from the rear that shows nothing.

Thanks, have a great day

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

No idea why those were marked as bad quality as they indeed aren't. I've put those back in the queue.

Thank you, for explaining this to me