AI Filter

It would be nice to filter out AI content, not a fan.

what should be filtered out is pictures below 2 MPixels.
AI tampered or generated content would need an AI tool to be spotted automatically. the only tool the picture uploading system has, would be the picture/ photo/ file metadata but usually content submitted is stripped of that.

Quote:

Originally posted by Reddog911

It would be nice to filter out AI content, not a fan.

AI content isn't allowed, if you spot some, feel free to report it so it's deleted.

https://hivemoderation.com/ai-generated-content-detection/?demo=image
https://www.fakeimagedetector.com
https://aiimagedetector.org/

Quote:

Originally posted by Reddog911

It would be nice to filter out AI content,

well, an automated system/ tool/ script of moderation that uses AI would save a lot of work hours of moderating images content.
and maybe there should exist a babe galleries category "fakes" because sometimes we cannot trust our eyes anymore...

I'd like to see an AI section, kind of a dressed/undressed like in the Forums. Got no problem ith it.

Quote:

Originally posted by billybushey

I'd like to see an AI section, kind of a dressed/undressed like in the Forums. Got no problem with it.

yes or a Tag in the powerful tags system of the website that would say that what you see is #AI or whatever!
if we like video-games that look like real well then why not have babes like that? We cannot stop it and if people like it, my only point is that we should know and be able to separate real real from virtual real. thanks.

I’d rather see AI versus the two posters that have 2’OOO+ of the same person every time or the grandma body posts. This site is based on the freedom to post whatever you want as long as it falls within the guidelines. So we all kinda have to deal with it like I do with the latest trend of grandparent porn

The guidelines specifically prohibit AI content. We want real girls here. The old lady grandma stuff also goes against the original intention of this site.

Quote:

Originally posted by etherware

well, an automated system/ tool/ script of moderation that uses AI would save a lot of work hours of moderating images content.

The problem with those AI detector is that they aren't 100% accurate. I used to use one (until it went paid only) and while it was useful when it gave a straight up "this is 100% AI" to confirm suspicions, the "in between" results weren't to be trusted (I tested it on a pic I knew was real and it gave AI generated suspicions)
I literally just took a random picture I took and one that predates AI pictures and tested them both Fake Image Detector and AI Image Detector : for the one I took, one gave a 10% AI / 90% not AI result, the other gave a "Looks like Computer Generated or Modified image". For the old pic one, they both seemed to say it was AI even though AI pictures didn't exist when that pic was taken... So yeah, would use those with a grain of salt.
Hive moderation seems to be the only one that got those right. But when it comes to the pic you linked, a 50/50 result doesn't helo much.

Thanks for the links though, might be useful as I was looking for some !

As for this specific picture that I've noticed on the home page, while it does look modified, I haven't found a reference to the original picture in search engines. Usually, for this kind of modifications (face swap or undressing) you easily find the original one too. So it might actually be legit. But if you do find a source where her shirt isn't see through, feel free to report it so it's removed.

Quote:

Originally posted by Nard187

I’d rather see AI versus the two posters that have 2’OOO of the same person every time or the grandma body posts. This site is based on the freedom to post whatever you want as long as it falls within the guidelines. So we all kinda have to deal with it like I do with the latest trend of grandparent porn

You can hide content from a specific user if you want : go on their profile, and on the top right, click on the "hide" button. You will not see their content in the galleries anymore. Very useful if there's a few uploaders you really don't like the content of.

Quote:

Originally posted by hydrahead

The guidelines specifically prohibit AI content. We want real girls here. The old lady grandma stuff also goes against the original intention of this site.

AI is indeed not allowed. However there's no rule regarding attractiveness or age, as long as the content isn't too extreme.

Omuh vous etes tres gentil

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

The problem with those AI detector is that they aren't 100% accurate. I used to use one (until it went paid only) and while it was useful when it gave a straight up "this is 100% AI" to confirm suspicions, the "in between" results weren't to be trusted

totally agree. the example of my attached picture(s) leads to the same conclusion.

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

(I tested it on a pic I knew was real and it gave AI generated suspicions) I literally just took a random picture I took and one that predates AI pictures and tested them both Fake Image Detector and AI Image Detector :
[...] they both seemed to say it was AI even though AI pictures didn't exist when that pic was taken...

I think what would help would be higher resolution images
and fakes -you know it- always existed: if you have two high-res pictures and you combine them, then scale the montage image to a much smaller in dimensions and save it to jpeg q=70% (which is the quality of images on wbwcom) then it's hard to judge if the common/ scaled image is a "fake" or not, no?

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

Hive moderation seems to be the only one that got those right. But when it comes to the pic you linked, a 50/50 result doesn't hello much. Thanks for the links though, might be useful

I hope it will be useful to the general public of wbwcom.
this "hive moderation" has/ provides industry scale technologies

Quote:

Originally posted by omuh

As for this specific picture that I've noticed on the home page, while it does look modified, I haven't found a reference to the original picture in search engines. Usually, for this kind of modifications (face swap or undressing) you easily find the original one too. So it might actually be legit. But if you do find a source where her shirt isn't see through, feel free to report it so it's removed.

nope. just full-zize it, the area of her breasts has different texture than her see-through garment and that area has the shape of the removed bra!!
I found the same picture on Motherless and zoomed it. the interwebs are full with this fake. and she has/ had an Instagram where she uploaded her original image according to a post of a user 7 months ago on NameThatPornstar...

Quote:

Originally posted by etherware

Omuh vous etes tres gentil

Merci!

Quote:

Originally posted by etherware

I think what would help would be higher resolution images
and fakes -you know it- always existed: if you have two high-res pictures and you combine them, then scale the montage image to a much smaller in dimensions and save it to jpeg q=70% (which is the quality of images on wbwcom) then it's hard to judge if the common/ scaled image is a "fake" or not, no?

Fakes used to be done via photoshop and were usually face swap where you could see the resolution difference between the head and the rest of the pic unless it was exceptionaly done or some details like parts of the original hairline showing. The other popular edits were morphs (where you make parts of the boddy bigger/small, usually boobs, ass or hips) and you could either spot those with warped objects/lines on the pic, or ridiculous proportions.
Nowadays, face swap seem to be way more common but are done through AI that does a better job at making a credible image (those are often used on fake twitter accounts to promote dodgy websites) but usually you can still find the original through reverse search engines.
Add the undress edits, also done through AI usually, that are also pretty hard to spot unless you know it (or can compare to the original) and were you might be able to see where the clothes used to be.

Quote:

Originally posted by etherware

nope. just full-zize it, the area of her breasts has different texture than her see-through garment and that area has the shape of the removed bra!!
I found the same picture on Motherless and zoomed it. the interwebs are full with this fake. and she has/ had an Instagram where she uploaded her original image according to a post of a user 7 months ago on NameThatPornstar...

Do you have the link of the pic on WBW? Can't seem to find it anymore

the pic was removed. I attach the blacklisted url of the image, it's 05F5685.jpg on cdn.motherless (I hope this is not against the wbwcom rules)
and TY for your sharing of wisdom about fakes!

Quote:

Originally posted by etherware

the pic was removed. I attach the blacklisted url of the image, it's 05F5685.jpg on cdn.motherless (I hope this is not against the wbwcom rules)
and TY for your sharing of wisdom about fakes!

Oh yeah I see the mark now, cheers!

I will say a lot of what I report is pulled down but it's a losing battle. The idiots are starting to run the village. It's an everyday thing on here. Not sure there has been a day where the front page 'Babes' are all real. Now with the clothes removal AI apps it's where any pict can be naked. I tried a free clothes removal on my wife. It's pretty good if you don't have the original photo.