Age Whiners

You know, I'm gonna have to rant a minute here, sorry.

But I get tired of this shit. Bear with me here.

Seems like every time someone posts a nice picture of a good looking girl (or girls) that are under the age of 35, you'll have a dozen posts that are positive about how good the chick looks, then some punk ass bitch comes in and says 'wow, looks a little young'.

Now don't misunderstand me. I don't want anything to do with child porn, but all in all, I have to say that the mods here do a good job of screening out the inappropriate pictures. Come to think of it, I don't think I"ve ever seen a picture here that could possibly be considered 'underage'.

Bottom line is, the minimum age for legal nude stuff is 18 (I think) and some girls that have pics posted here are 18 or 19. If a girl looks younger than that, do one of two things.

1. Report it to a moderator
2. Close the window and don't look

But for God's sake, stop whining!!!!

Well said!

*moved to lounge*

Thanks,

I wasn't sure where I should post it, but it needed to be said.

Actually this should be in Feedback.

I do agree, but sometimes it does take a while for anything to be done about a post that has been reported. There are some posters here that do nothing but post borderline material, and if the mods weren't so aware, they probably would be posting kiddie porn.

Quote:

Come to think of it, I don't think I"ve ever seen a picture here that could possibly be considered 'underage'.

I don't know how long you've been lurking here, but there have been tons. After reporting a post of questionable material, I still make a post about the fact that they are underage. This is to let the user know that I am aware and that they have been reported. Now I will only do this, though, in threads started by the four or five main offenders on this site, and by this I mean the same people that all they do is post stuff trying to push the boundaries of what's legal or not.

I come here every few days. I just kinda look around, check out a movie now and then.

My point was, some girls that are 18 look 15, and there ain't nothin' you or I can do about that. If someone doesn't want to see younger (legal) girls here, they should go to a mature or milf site.

Quote:

Originally posted by lawnfella

I come here every few days. I just kinda look around, check out a movie now and then.

My point was, some girls that are 18 look 15, and there ain't nothin' you or I can do about that. If someone doesn't want to see younger (legal) girls here, they should go to a mature or milf site.

I totally agree with you on this post. But as I said, there are four or five members here who tend to post nothing but underage girls, they used to post them naked, now they post them in bikinis.

How can you tell they are underage, and don't just look young. Is it 'really' obvious? Some times it's hard to tell. Those that post underage stuff should be reported to the paw paws.

We've had pedophiles post 4 to 12 year olds in hardcore situations. Most of the time its real obvious if they are underage, and we don't tolerate it. I am still very much opposed to the nonnude public babes because a lot of pedophiles think that since the little children are clothed its okay.

I don't give a shit if a girl is clothed or not, if you are staring at a child here its still fucking wrong. Don't even try that "we aren't looking at her in a sexual way" shit either.

"She looks a little young!" thank you lawnfella who gives a fuck if the girls dont look there age if they are 18 or older then PLEASE POST THE PICS lol lawnfella brings plenty of points but i have to say i have seen two under age pics i told the person and the mods and it was gone the next day the mods do an awsome job so for you people who think they look "to young" UNLESS you know for FACT that they are underage please SHUT THE FUCK UP and let us enjoy this site

Agreed. Nude or in a friggin eskimo suit that weighs 40 pounds, staring at a child is sick and wrong. I had no idea that fuckers posted pics of 4 year old girls. Them kind of folks need a bullet, but that's just my personal opinion.

I saw a model sight the other day. It must have had 30 links to it. Sad thing was, the model was like ten years old. Naturally, she wasn't posing nude, but may as well have been. And to think her parents let her do that. Hell, they should throw the parents in jail for child exploitation.

You could tell that the website was designed for sicko-wanker pedos.

when you mod enough pics you begin to "just know"...

and yes sometimes its obvious, we do report them, however this is an international site hosted in the Netherlands, things take time.

If the girl looks underage, its still being used to foster a fantasy of a minor.

Is this yet another whining thread about the age of the girls?

Jesus, people can whine how much they want to each and every single picture on this entire site.
God, there are underaged girls on this site as we speak, so of course there are some numbnuts that are way too nervous about it. Try and look at the pics instead of reading the comments.... easier to wank that way aswell...

i want to be forever young....la la la la la

Lawn, give me the thread with those URLs. I'm going to take it down and have those urls posted on the blacklist.

Quote:

Originally posted by Kanzen

We've had pedophiles post 4 to 12 year olds in hardcore situations. Most of the time its real obvious if they are underage, and we don't tolerate it. I am still very much opposed to the nonnude public babes because a lot of pedophiles think that since the little children are clothed its okay.

I don't give a shit if a girl is clothed or not, if you are staring at a child here its still fucking wrong. Don't even try that "we aren't looking at her in a sexual way" shit either.

This is exactly what I am talking about, and I have conversed through PM with Kanzen about my feelings on this.

Quote:

Originally posted by Kanzen

We've had pedophiles post 4 to 12 year olds in hardcore situations. Most of the time its real obvious if they are underage, and we don't tolerate it. I am still very much opposed to the nonnude public babes because a lot of pedophiles think that since the little children are clothed its okay.

I don't give a shit if a girl is clothed or not, if you are staring at a child here its still fucking wrong. Don't even try that "we aren't looking at her in a sexual way" shit either.

Quote:

Originally posted by Kanzen

If the girl looks underage, its still being used to foster a fantasy of a minor.

very well said Kanzen !

a chick has to look like a woman. period.

- Lawn, give me the thread with those URLs. I'm going to take it down and have those urls posted on the blacklist.-

I didn't mean the links were here. They were on the webpage I saw.