Quote:
Originally posted by MatriXxX99
...
what is that never heard of it
Go to a picture and you see the tagger, there is a new button added called "List"
- Goto:
- Go
Diz-X 16 years ago
Go to a picture and you see the tagger, there is a new button added called "List"
Diz-X 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by MatriXxX99
getting an error
Notice (8): Undefined offset: 1000 [APP/models/rating.php, line 122]
Code | Context
$extraSql = "a.status <= 1 AND "
$row = array(
array(
"a" => array()
),
array(
"a" => array()
),
array(
"a" => array()
),
array(
"a" => array()
),
array(
"a" => array()
),
array(
"a" => array()
)
)
if (isset($row[0])) {
return($row[mt_rand(0, count($row))]['a']['pictureid']);
Rating::GetRandomBarItem() - APP/models/rating.php, line 122
RatingController::ratepicture() - APP/controllers/rating_controller.php, line 137
Object::dispatchMethod() - CORE/cake/libs/object.php, line 119
Dispatcher::_invoke() - CORE/cake/dispatcher.php, line 245
Dispatcher::dispatch() - CORE/cake/dispatcher.php, line 211
[main] - APP/webroot/index.php, line 89
Warning (2): Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /var/www/wbwv5/cake/basics.php:111) [CORE/cake/libs/controller/components/cookie.php, line 364]
When i rate picture in hot or not i get this error
also the error : "you rated all the pictures in the database"
Edit: Removed a couple of line in the reply and also where having this problem with more than 1 picture
Fixed.
** edit: found it afterall
* This post has been modified
: 16 years ago
BWT 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Diz-X
List style tagger tool added!
Great so far !
Only bug so far is on my mac using either safari 3 or 4 Beta and FF 3.0.10
When you have selected all the tags and go add selected tags ... It appears as if nothing happens. It adds the tags but the box does not close and just stays there.
If possible, when you press "add selected tags" could the box close and maybe even refresh the page .. like it does when you vote for a pic????
Tarquin 16 years ago
I am using Firefox version 3.1b3 (yes, the beta).
On this page it has the five pictures underneath the one large picture. The current picture and then two either up or down the queue.
I have the thumbnail view preference set to "Full" but am getting the "cropped" versions instead.
On this page it has the five pictures underneath the one large picture. The current picture and then two either up or down the queue.
I have the thumbnail view preference set to "Full" but am getting the "cropped" versions instead.
Diz-X 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by bluewatertwo
...
Great so far !
Only bug so far is on my mac using either safari 3 or 4 Beta and FF 3.0.10
When you have selected all the tags and go add selected tags ... It appears as if nothing happens. It adds the tags but the box does not close and just stays there.
If possible, when you press "add selected tags" could the box close and maybe even refresh the page .. like it does when you vote for a pic????
Try again, hopefully this fixed it.
:: edit ::
Doesn't seem to fix it.. will look in to it when I get home.
* This post has been modified
: 16 years ago
Diz-X 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquin
I am using Firefox version 3.1b3 (yes, the beta).
On [ Link ] it has the five pictures underneath the one large picture. The current picture and then two either up or down the queue.
I have the thumbnail view preference set to "Full" but am getting the "cropped" versions instead.
Screenshot? as I am not running firefox 3.1
fingereleven 16 years ago
The same problem all the time. Can someone tell me why pretty often (also in previous versions) I can see less than 200 babes in top200 (from 50 to 100)? Very irritating bug for me.
Diz-X 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by karpiu_miszcz
The same problem all the time. Can someone tell me why pretty often (also in previous versions) I can see less than 200 babes in top200 (from 50 to 100)? Very irritating bug for me.
Aware of this, this has todo that there are not enough votes made that month on enough pictures. Only way is to get voting on all the pictures you view. The new hot or not is 10 times better and this will help solve this problem overtime.
Tarquin 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Diz-X
...
Screenshot? as I am not running firefox 3.1
Sure thing. wbw0001.jpg is of my favorites (it renders correctly).
wbw0002.jpg is of the enlarged pic if I click on one - rendering the cropped versions instead of the full version of the thumbs.
BWT 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquin
...
Sure thing. wbw0001.jpg is of my favorites (it renders correctly).
wbw0002.jpg is of the enlarged pic if I click on one - rendering the cropped versions instead of the full version of the thumbs.
It has always been like this .. You have been able to change between full and cropped on the gallery pages but when you click on the individual images it is always the cropped version thumbs below the main image regardless of settings ... I checked in version 5 and it is the same
Tarquin 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by bluewatertwo
...
It has always been like this .. You have been able to change between full and cropped on the gallery pages but when you click on the individual images it is always the cropped version thumbs below the main image regardless of settings ... I checked in version 5 and it is the same
Not on my browser. On the old version of the boards in my browser that same view shows the full version.
Edit: You're right actually. Sort of.
I just checked - it is indeed cropped, but it crops differently and as such, makes sense. Notr the absence of the head of the girl with the red dress in the thumb above, and its presence here.
Tarquin 16 years ago
I have a new one. I'm on the same browser (Firefox 3.1b3) and I ran across a page error (attached).
I got it while looking at this page.
Refreshing the page and clearing the cache doesn't seem to rectify the issue.
I got it while looking at this page.
Refreshing the page and clearing the cache doesn't seem to rectify the issue.
AriIoeHau 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by wortel
wow your first forum post in 4.5 year!welcome!
5.5
Tarquin 16 years ago
This one's not a bug, but just a request.
When doing hot or not, it pulls up the most recent upload that a given user has not rated.
I'd like it better if it pulled up the oldest upload that I hadn't rated.
The reason is because as I go through these, if I spot a dupe I like to report the newest version of that picture, rather than the oldest one (first poster should always get to keep his picture, IMO).
So if I start from the newest uploads and see a dupe, I can't really report it, because I don't know how old the picture was the last time I saw it unless I find it again.
If I'm working from oldest to newest and see a dupe though, I know that wherever I may have seen it, the other picture was older and can report the one in front of me knowing it was not the first to be uploaded.
Does that make sense?
Anyway, just tossing that out there. I always try to report the newest version of the pic and let the oldest version stay, and working from oldest to newest uploads makes that easier.
When doing hot or not, it pulls up the most recent upload that a given user has not rated.
I'd like it better if it pulled up the oldest upload that I hadn't rated.
The reason is because as I go through these, if I spot a dupe I like to report the newest version of that picture, rather than the oldest one (first poster should always get to keep his picture, IMO).
So if I start from the newest uploads and see a dupe, I can't really report it, because I don't know how old the picture was the last time I saw it unless I find it again.
If I'm working from oldest to newest and see a dupe though, I know that wherever I may have seen it, the other picture was older and can report the one in front of me knowing it was not the first to be uploaded.
Does that make sense?
Anyway, just tossing that out there. I always try to report the newest version of the pic and let the oldest version stay, and working from oldest to newest uploads makes that easier.
Diz-X 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquin
...
Sure thing. wbw0001.jpg is of my favorites (it renders correctly).
wbw0002.jpg is of the enlarged pic if I click on one - rendering the cropped versions instead of the full version of the thumbs.
The pictures under the full are by design cropped, this is not a bug related to a browser.
Diz-X 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by AriIoeHau
...
5.5
Hope to see you posting more mate!
Diz-X 16 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Tarquin
I have a new one. I'm on the same browser (Firefox 3.1b3) and I ran across a page error (attached).
I got it while looking at [ Link ].
Refreshing the page and clearing the cache doesn't seem to rectify the issue.
Good find!! is fixed now!
P.i.P 16 years ago
It took some getting used to it, but its a great improvement and i havn't found one single problem yet.
I have just one suggestion:
In the old version you could addapt the ammount of pic's or posts shown on a page.
And I kinda liked that option.
I have just one suggestion:
In the old version you could addapt the ammount of pic's or posts shown on a page.
And I kinda liked that option.
- Goto:
- Go
