Score: 4.96 Votes: 23
rate this

Tips On Looking for 'That' Girl using Google

Starter: cheap2 Posted: 12 years ago Views: 114.1K
  • Goto:
#4687898
Lvl 63
This is a little tutorial on basic search skills using Google that I think many users are unaware. I know that this may not be the right (sub) forum to post it on but since is pretty related to the topic I'm asking the mods to leave it here (and maybe make it sticky ).

FYI, most of my searchs are done using Reverse Search Engines but keep in mind that for those pics that you never find it's always useful to come to forums like this one where perverts like us usually hang out. The more traffic this forums have, the greater probability that someone identifies the girl. These forums can be places like Freeones, 4Chan, TheChive, to mention a few.

You can find many Reverse Search Engines on the Web. One of the best, until some time ago, was tineye.com that worked very well with a small database until Google jumped in.

These are the search engines I use...

http://images.google.com
http://tineye.com
http://gifsauce.wazdat.com/
http://iqdb.org/
http://www.revimg.net/

If you're a Firefox or Chrome user you'll find some nice add-ons, at least for the main ones.

Needless to say that that Google's great and search for pics using this tool is very easy. Just go to http://images.google.com and click on that little camera icon on the right side of the search bar that displays a tool tip saying 'Search by image'...



This will raise a little popup window that gives you 3 options, each one self-explanatory...

1. Paste image URL
2. Upload an image (from your computer)
3. Drag an drop an image





This kind of search is great, per se. But it gets better. Even when, IMHO, it still has some bugs, Google allows you to add terms to your search so you can refine the results or get a better approach to what you want.



So, what can this terms be? Anything related o that describes your image in a better way... Something that describe the girl (amateur, teen, MILF, jailbait), names of sites where it comes from, and anything that crosses your mind.

Oh, and a tip... don't forget to turn the SafeSearch off for best results.

With this, a little imagination and more free time you'll have to be able to find that girl.

Any comment or contribution is welcome.
twor76, Xeke, Goldseeker, joebillybob and 5 other(s) find this awesome.
#4687899
Perfect. Google is king IMO. TinEye is legit, but not as good as it has been. Haven't used the others. Great work!
joebillybob finds this awesome.
#4687900
Lvl 37
Thanks cheap2!
I made it a sticky so it will always be at the top.

Remember, this is not a request thread.
Comments and questions are welcome.
joebillybob finds this awesome.
#4687901
Lvl 5
Thanks very much cheap2, I had been meaning to ask about something like this for awhile
#4687902
Lvl 10
Thanks for breaking it down for us newbies. I been wondering
joebillybob finds this awesome.
#4687903
Lvl 22
Now that Cheap has given this wisdom look out for the Abbot.

Thanks for your work Cheap !
joebillybob finds this awesome.
#4687904
Lvl 17
Cheap is THE king on the 'whose that girl' search. Nice tutorial too!
#4737946
Lvl 63
Bumping!
Jayartinez finds this awesome.
#4738130
Lvl 22
thanks, cheap. i missed this the first time around
web_jock finds this awesome.
#4741512
Lvl 9
Ah, a fellow search guru. Agreed that Tineye isn't quite what it used to be. Seems they've severely reduced their research bandwidth and lost/deleted a great deal of their indexes. It shows in how out-dated their index is. 90% of my Tineye searches anymore lead to defunct sites, like anothersite. However, I still find Tineye is better than google in regards to different resolutions/crops and minor alterations, like someone photoshopping a different face into an image or changing the exposure to things like b/w or sepia. That is, provided Tineye has indexed the image.

I'd like to add a couple pointers in regards to using google images.

1. Google's "suggested" search terms can often be completely hatch-brained and worthless. You'll find that most often when google inserts its own search terms to correlate with your image, they lead to countless tumblr and other blog-style posts which typically offer absolutely no viable information whatsoever. If you're lucky, google won't suggest any search terms at all, so you'll get a nice, unbiased pool of initial data. If your first search, which hopefully yielded virgin results (no automatically inserted search terms), doesn't supply the information you're looking in the first few pages of results, I suggest adding two specific terms, with this optional third; identify, (girl's hair color), and if you like, a site name, like here or freeones, that has babe identification threads. Bear in mind, google's image search, in the fashion we're using it here, disregards quotation marks and bugs out to zero results if you use exclusionary terms.

2. The "visually similar" function is tricky. If you use the function from the original search results, where you get listed sites instead of a grid of photographs, it will use any search terms that are in the bar, and typically show results that are leaps and bounds from what you're looking for, unless you were concise with your terms and related images of the girl/situation are indexed accordingly, both on google and the sites that are being searched. If you go to "all sizes" or "visually similar" results and then continue to delve further using the visually similar links, your initial search image will be disregarded and your search terms will be blanketed across all indexed images and applied to the last image you clicked "visually similar" for.

3. All images have hardline "tags" built into their internet indexes. You can find two pictures from opposite ends of the web that are exactly the same to look at, and when you click "visually similar" with the exact same search terms, a different set of results will appear. So don't be afraid to use the same image from different sources to help strengthen your searches.

Never fear, though. A little knuckle grease, patience, and a steady eye and you can find anything. I'm actually fixing to start a thread right here involving a girl that I have found over 100 different images of using these methods, but, unfortunately, still haven't found what I'm specifically looking for. However, the more I find, the closer I get.
peeponu, KowRama, joebillybob, swampyy find this awesome.
#4743245
Lvl 63
Thanks foible
#4749928
Lvl 15
Awesome Thank you I did not know I could do this with Google
#4785183
Lvl 15
Great info, thanks.
#4796089
Lvl 2
Quote:
Originally posted by pornversion
Perfect. Google is king IMO. TinEye is legit, but not as good as it has been. Haven't used the others. Great work!

hmmmmmmmmmmmm
#4855942
Lvl 14
Thanks!
#4863017
Lvl 11
Here is how I became a master at reverse image searches. You can use the following websites:

karmadecay.com/ - Upload your photo or do a direct link to the URL. I Always start here as it searches on Reddit, Google, Bing (which is actually REALLY good for finding image matches) and the website below (Imageops). In most reddit comments people will link the galleries if the image exists on reddit.

imgops.com/ - Look for the reverse/similar search and try all of their options, you will get some results. This website also has MANY useful tools such as being able to post the image to many image hosting sites, edit it into a gif (or edit a current gif), add effects (if you are into that sort of thing) and convert the image to another picture format. Great site.

pictriev.com/ - This does facial recognition on images. Still needs to have some kinks worked out, but this has helped me find out if some girls are pros or amateurs.
cheap2, efb69 find this awesome.
#4864306
Lvl 63
Quote:
Originally posted by Sadataymadamie
Here is how I became a master at reverse image searches. You can use the following websites:

karmadecay.com/ - Upload your photo or do a direct link to the URL. I Always start here as it searches on Reddit, Google, Bing (which is actually REALLY good for finding image matches) and the website below (Imageops). In most reddit comments people will link the galleries if the image exists on reddit.

imgops.com/ - Look for the reverse/similar search and try all of their options, you will get some results. This website also has MANY useful tools such as being able to post the image to many image hosting sites, edit it into a gif (or edit a current gif), add effects (if you are into that sort of thing) and convert the image to another picture format. Great site.

pictriev.com/ - This does facial recognition on images. Still needs to have some kinks worked out, but this has helped me find out if some girls are pros or amateurs.


Thanks for the tips... And I will add imgur.com to your websites
#4905962
Lvl 14
Quote:
Originally posted by azdesertrat
thanks, cheap. i missed this the first time around


Same here, cheap32 at WBW! Thanks a lot!
#4913870
Lvl 21
Quote:
Originally posted by foible
Ah, a fellow search guru. Agreed that Tineye isn't quite what it used to be. Seems they've severely reduced their research bandwidth and lost/deleted a great deal of their indexes. It shows in how out-dated their index is. 90% of my Tineye searches anymore lead to defunct sites, like anothersite. However, I still find Tineye is better than google in regards to different resolutions/crops and minor alterations, like someone photoshopping a different face into an image or changing the exposure to things like b/w or sepia. That is, provided Tineye has indexed the image.

I'd like to add a couple pointers in regards to using google images.

1. Google's "suggested" search terms can often be completely hatch-brained and worthless. You'll find that most often when google inserts its own search terms to correlate with your image, they lead to countless tumblr and other blog-style posts which typically offer absolutely no viable information whatsoever. If you're lucky, google won't suggest any search terms at all, so you'll get a nice, unbiased pool of initial data. If your first search, which hopefully yielded virgin results (no automatically inserted search terms), doesn't supply the information you're looking in the first few pages of results, I suggest adding two specific terms, with this optional third; identify, (girl's hair color), and if you like, a site name, like here or freeones, that has babe identification threads. Bear in mind, google's image search, in the fashion we're using it here, disregards quotation marks and bugs out to zero results if you use exclusionary terms.

2. The "visually similar" function is tricky. If you use the function from the original search results, where you get listed sites instead of a grid of photographs, it will use any search terms that are in the bar, and typically show results that are leaps and bounds from what you're looking for, unless you were concise with your terms and related images of the girl/situation are indexed accordingly, both on google and the sites that are being searched. If you go to "all sizes" or "visually similar" results and then continue to delve further using the visually similar links, your initial search image will be disregarded and your search terms will be blanketed across all indexed images and applied to the last image you clicked "visually similar" for.

3. All images have hardline "tags" built into their internet indexes. You can find two pictures from opposite ends of the web that are exactly the same to look at, and when you click "visually similar" with the exact same search terms, a different set of results will appear. So don't be afraid to use the same image from different sources to help strengthen your searches.

Never fear, though. A little knuckle grease, patience, and a steady eye and you can find anything. I'm actually fixing to start a thread right here involving a girl that I have found over 100 different images of using these methods, but, unfortunately, still haven't found what I'm specifically looking for. However, the more I find, the closer I get.


One thing I do sometimes is click "All sizes" and check the site with the higher resolution, they more likely have the source.
#4969902
Lvl 3
imageraider.com
cheap2 finds this awesome.
  • Goto: