Emma Watson - of HP Fame

There's some great photoshoots of Emma Watson floating around the net, at various premieres and stuff but no decent HQ ones. Anybody have access to any HQ pics of Emma they could share? ^_^

Here's a few smaller ones:

a little young for me mate

dude she's 15 , min 16 to be posted on this site

just reported it for the same reason not legal till next year, even then still looks to young

She's not 16 yet? o_0

not till next year

are there any mods on line that could deleat this thread?

She's Sweet

Quote:

Originally posted by angeleyes

are there any mods on line that could deleat this thread?

PM Senja he's online

Since when were posts to the <i>Famous Babes</i> limited to only those 16 or older? As long as the pics posted of those under 16 are fully clothed, there should not be such an issue...

Quote:

Originally posted by NoPook

Since when were posts to the <i>Famous Babes</i> limited to only those 16 or older? As long as the pics posted of those under 16 are fully clothed, there should not be such an issue...

The rules say otherwise...

I'd sure like to stir her cauldron! when se is legal of course.

There was a drinking game through the HP movies that we used to play. Everytime you thought she was hot, you had to take a shot. Some of us were a mess!! :-)

Quote:

Originally posted by NoPook

Since when were posts to the <i>Famous Babes</i> limited to only those 16 or older? As long as the pics posted of those under 16 are fully clothed, there should not be such an issue...

Couldn't agree more - The price of fame is being in the public eye, and so long as the images do not breach decency laws - and laws about paedophilia - I don't have a problem with this thread. That said, I wouldn't want <i> Famous Babes<i> to be flooded with twelve year old starlets either. Ultimately, I suppose you have to ask whether she fits the criteria: Is she famous, and is she a babe? To the first, I'd say yes. To the second - baby, yes, babe, no.

Quote:

Originally posted by Suckrates

[reply=NoPook]
Since when were posts to the <i>Famous Babes</i> limited to only those 16 or older? As long as the pics posted of those under 16 are fully clothed, there should not be such an issue...

The rules say otherwise...
[/reply]


What rule is that? As long as descency rules are followed there should be nothing wrong with somebody posting pictures of a famous person in this section. Even if they are not nude! And in this case, especially if they are not nude...

Quote:

Originally posted by NoPook

Since when were posts to the <i>Famous Babes</i> limited to only those 16 or older? As long as the pics posted of those under 16 are fully clothed, there should not be such an issue...

since forever dude. and the new rules are 18+.

Quote:

Originally posted by NoPook

[reply=Suckrates]
[reply=NoPook]
Since when were posts to the <i>Famous Babes</i> limited to only those 16 or older? As long as the pics posted of those under 16 are fully clothed, there should not be such an issue...

The rules say otherwise...
[/reply]


What rule is that? As long as descency rules are followed there should be nothing wrong with somebody posting pictures of a famous person in this section. Even if they are not nude! And in this case, especially if they are not nude...
[/reply]

the rules of this site. descency rules? what might those be?

*locked*