could the cropped - AI and Altered/photoshopped also be added to the reportlist ?
- Goto:
- Go
Diz-X 1 month ago
Quote:
Originally posted by omuhLooks good to me!
Could you also look into the possibility to make it so that if a picture is sideways/upside down, after we rotate it the good way, we can reverse search engine and it actually looks for the rotated pic and not the sideways one. Otherwise, we can't check those properly.
Will have to look into this.
Diz-X 1 month ago
Quote:
Originally posted by boobiemonstercould the cropped - AI and Altered/photoshopped also be added to the reportlist ?
The reporting system is going to get an overhaul also. Good you mentioned it, I haven't mentioned it, but was part of the plan!
sogood finds this awesome.
AJ100 1 month ago
Quote:
Originally posted by omuhLooks good to me!
Could you also look into the possibility to make it so that if a picture is sideways/upside down, after we rotate it the good way, we can reverse search engine and it actually looks for the rotated pic and not the sideways one. Otherwise, we can't check those properly.
Why bother with this at all. If the pic is uploaded sideways or upside down just reject it as 'quality'. If the uploader is that careless or lazy that's their problem, not ours.
Dennis2377 finds this awesome.
boobiemonster 1 month ago
Quote:
Originally posted by AJ100Why bother with this at all. If the pic is uploaded sideways or upside down just reject it as 'quality'. If the uploader is that careless or lazy that's their problem, not ours.
this has nothing to do with carelessness or lazyness from the uploader....
in next link they explain why this happens (c/p link in browser to make it work)
https://kb.blackbaud.com/knowledgebase/Article/23917
* This post has been modified
: 1 month ago
Diz-X 1 month ago
Quote:
Originally posted by boobiemonsterthis has nothing to do with carelessness or lazyness from the uploader....
in next link they explain why this happens (c/p link in browser to make it
I wouldn't know if the library we use to convert/manipulate images looks at the meta data for orientation. I was aware that this could happen. I will look into it when I have the time.
bob4funs1234 finds this awesome.
Diz-X 2 weeks ago
Small update, most of the new system is done. I am currently working on reworking the whole reporting system. For example when reporting a wrong category, you must select new category.
nok_nok finds this awesome.
Diz-X 2 weeks ago
Current reasons:
1 => 'A person in content is a Professional or Celebrity',
2 => 'Content is from you or your organisation and with to be taken off',
3 => 'Content has logo, url or copyright marks on it',
4 => 'Content is broken',
5 => 'Content is in wrong category',
7 => 'Duplicate content',
8 => 'Person in content is underage',
9 => 'Content does not belong in current series',
10 => 'Insult',
11 => 'Other reason',
1 => 'A person in content is a Professional or Celebrity',
2 => 'Content is from you or your organisation and with to be taken off',
3 => 'Content has logo, url or copyright marks on it',
4 => 'Content is broken',
5 => 'Content is in wrong category',
7 => 'Duplicate content',
8 => 'Person in content is underage',
9 => 'Content does not belong in current series',
10 => 'Insult',
11 => 'Other reason',
omuh 2 weeks ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Diz-XCurrent reasons:
1 => 'A person in content is a Professional or Celebrity',
2 => 'Content is from you or your organisation and with to be taken off',
3 => 'Content has logo, url or copyright marks on it',
4 => 'Content is broken',
5 => 'Content is in wrong category',
7 => 'Duplicate content',
8 => 'Person in content is underage',
9 => 'Content does not belong in current series',
10 => 'Insult',
11 => 'Other reason',
Could add "Content is AI generated" as this is something I often see in the comments of AI pics that go accepted by mistake.
Maybe "Content is cropped or photoshopped" too as some users seem to be reporting those too, probably would require providing a link to uncropped/unalteraed pic to confirm the report.
* This post has been modified
: 2 weeks ago
The_Sentinel, Diz-X, 2good find this awesome.
Diz-X 2 weeks ago
Quote:
Originally posted by omuhCould add "Content is AI generated" as this is something I often see in the comments of AI pics that go accepted by mistake.
Maybe "Content is cropped or photoshopped" too as some users seem to be reporting those too, probably would require providing a link to uncropped/unalteraed pic to confirm the report.
With some reporting will require for example model name, and url. Cropped would a url be a good one..
2good finds this awesome.
2good 2 weeks ago
if you ask for reports to do it from users, then moderators should have to do the same when they reject it.
Diz-X 2 weeks ago
Quote:
Originally posted by mysecondaccountif you ask for reports to do it from users, then moderators should have to do the same when they reject it.
@sogood: The system works if everybody helps out.
The_Sentinel 2 weeks ago
Quote:
Originally posted by mysecondaccountif you ask for reports to do it from users, then moderators should have to do the same when they reject it.
We do - that's why you see on your rejections when an image is rejected for "underage", "professional", "duplicate" etc.
I do think that we should have to select a deletion reason (same options as already listed) when we are removing images that were initially accepted.
omuh finds this awesome.
thegrandwazoo 1 week ago
Quote:
Originally posted by Diz-XCurrent reasons:
1 => 'A person in content is a Professional or Celebrity',
2 => 'Content is from you or your organisation and with to be taken off',
3 => 'Content has logo, url or copyright marks on it',
4 => 'Content is broken',
5 => 'Content is in wrong category',
7 => 'Duplicate content',
8 => 'Person in content is underage',
9 => 'Content does not belong in current series',
10 => 'Insult',
11 => 'Other reason',
Should "Professional content" be its own category? I've reported several uploads straight from GirlsDoPorn recently and while the girls themselves are not celebs, the site they're clearly from is.
Diz-X 1 week ago
Quote:
Originally posted by The_SentinelWe do - that's why you see on your rejections when an image is rejected for "underage", "professional", "duplicate" etc.
I do think that we should have to select a deletion reason (same options as already listed) when we are removing images that were initially accepted.
Yes, this has been added in development version. When deleting content, you now must select a reason.
omuh finds this awesome.
omuh 1 week ago
Quote:
Originally posted by thegrandwazooShould "Professional content" be its own category? I've reported several uploads straight from GirlsDoPorn recently and while the girls themselves are not celebs, the site they're clearly from is.
They're paid to do the porn shots, so they are professionals in that regard, even if they aren't well known pornstars.
Diz-X 1 week ago
Quote:
Originally posted by omuhThey're paid to do the porn shots, so they are professionals in that regard, even if they aren't well known pornstars.
Could change the context a bit of the text, but a professional shoot with an amateur babe is something different. that's why I have chosen the wording.
AJ100 finds this awesome.
Diz-X 2 days ago
the new reporting system is coming along nicely. After the new update with overhaul of the moderation system I want to recruite 4+ moderators to speed up moderation. If you are interested send me a message.
garjoc 2 days ago
This for photos or videos (or applies to both) Diz? I ask because I seem to have dropped off the video moderation team (I was never on the photos team, but did point out some mis-categorizations occasionally).
sogood finds this awesome.
- Goto:
- Go