* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago
- Goto:
- Go
[Deleted] 19 years ago
mutt28 19 years ago
greatt thread do post more
* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago
Kanzen 19 years ago
// thread moved.
This is why I'm irritated by nonnude, people think just because they're clothed that its okay to post children.
This is why I'm irritated by nonnude, people think just because they're clothed that its okay to post children.
* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago
CamelKnight 19 years ago
according to what I understand Diz told me it doesn't matter how young they are. as long as they aren't involved in any sexual activity on the picture, it's ok.
to be honest, I personally feel that if it looks young, it prolly is young and you shouldn't accept it, not in the queue and not on the forum. however, I'm not the one with the final say in this so I should shut up.
ofcourse you all know I wont. I'd say delete the entire thread and slap the motherfucker who posted it. it's too sexy / in the vicinity of nudeness to allow.
CK
to be honest, I personally feel that if it looks young, it prolly is young and you shouldn't accept it, not in the queue and not on the forum. however, I'm not the one with the final say in this so I should shut up.
ofcourse you all know I wont. I'd say delete the entire thread and slap the motherfucker who posted it. it's too sexy / in the vicinity of nudeness to allow.
CK
* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago
wit_ 19 years ago
I still believe in the 16 and obove with clothes and 18 and above without clothes.
But some of those girls look even under 16....
But some of those girls look even under 16....
* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago
Kanzen 19 years ago
I don't see how clothing should affect the matter. They are still fantasizing about having sex with children. Its not like anyone here is really checking out their fashion sense.
* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago
- Goto:
- Go