Quote:
Originally posted by Kanzen
[reply=Powerflux]
[reply=Kanzen]
[reply=rainbowdemon]
^^
One would have to be a bit anal to actually know that!!
Nah, I just checked system's activity monitor while I had the video playing to get the number, outside of that is just basic math.
100 / 0.8 = 125
Anyways, anyone want to donate to the "Get Kanzen two 30" monitors so he can try to watch 125 videos at the same time" fund?
[/reply]
suppose that rendering that many overlays and decoding that many video's isn't a problem, with GPU-acceleration or quad core cpu and multithreaded codecs by example (i understand you run quad), your harddrive throughput rate or tranfer speed is going to be the limit.
taking 100KB/s (wich is low for good pr0n , let alone 720p x264 or xvid) * 125 = 122 MB/second minimal continuous throughput, wich only a Really Decent 10Krpm/15Krpm raid array can provide. 2x WD Raptor in raid 0 isn't sufficient.
if you have that array, i take back what i said.
[/reply]
I have a RAID 0 [256K] going with 4 drives. I can easily exceed 190MB/s on uncached read (according to Xbench).
http://db.xbench.com/merge.xhtml?doc2=224579
[/reply]
nice
* This post has been modified
: 17 years ago