Babe Ratings

Anyone else feel like too many pics( NOT MINE ) Get unfair ratings? Seems like a lot of hide in the shadows users like to vote 1's on pics that clearly dont deserve such a hideous rating. Especially prevelant in the Sexy Babes section....I've seen numerous pics of jaw dropping beautiful women there and they have a shit rating, either due to slam voting or just because their not nude. And we wont even get into those who like to trash ratings on pics just because they dont like the user....and I'm not talkin bout Mr. Wood!! Cant defend that at all. Just wanted to get other opinions on it............

I agree. There are people who vote low for various reasons, not shaved, shaved, black, white, non-nude. I agree about the sexy babe section. It seems unless she is showing her pussy lots of people vote low. Ehh...whatyagonnado?

Quote:

Originally posted by faulty6six6

I agree. There are people who vote low for various reasons, not shaved, shaved, black, white, non-nude. I agree about the sexy babe section. It seems unless she is showing her pussy lots of people vote low. Ehh...whatyagonnado?

I know ratings are a matter of personal taste, I try to keep an open mind when rating...I dont really prefer a full bush but if the babe is hot I'm certainly not going to let a little pubic hair affect my rating! I think people get closed minded at times, would ya walk away from buying a Ferrari for $500 just because the previous owner painted it babyshit green?? Hell no, you'd buy it and paint that bitch!! Really like your avatar....maybe when I've been here longer I'll ask one of the people much more web savvy than I to do one for me!!

Yeah I noticed a lot of super hot, clothed chicks getting lower ratings but hey, it's people's opinions. If someone votes low because she's non nude, that's their perogative. Personally, I think some of the highest rated pics here aren't all that great but that's my opinion too.

http://whatboyswant.com/showpicture/1230201


Above is a link to one of the "Sexy Babes" pics that is a fairly good example. At the time I pulled the link this pic has a rating of 6.69. I'm not saying it's dramatically off the mark but in my opinion both girls rate an 8- 8.5. Extremely pretty faces and very nice figures( what you can see of them ) As far as I can tell the sexy babe and cute babe sections dont feature any nudity.Going off that why would anyone go into those sections and then give a low rating because they are not nude? I and all of you know when you click on this section you arent going to find nudity... Lets have a science experiment if you wanna participate. What is your ideal rating for above pic. and yes I do have too much time on my hands so I think about dumb shit like this. for some Im sure you have more important things to do but hopefully some of ya will play along.

I think it goes both ways. I constantly see women in the top 5 who don't belong in the top 200. Some people click 1's too often others click 10's too often. I think it all evens out in the end.

I do disagree with your last post where you say those girls are 8's or 8.5's. That would mean they are hotter then 80-85% of women and I just don't think so on that pic of those 2 girls. I'd say they're 6 or 7's which is right where their rating is.

Quote:

Originally posted by KJMDrum

Im not tryin to start a war but I cant be the only one that thinks this isnt fair??

How is it not fair? It's a democratic system of voting in which the votes are averaged. You can't possibly get anymore fair then that.

You're rating the picture itself not necessarily the girl in the picture so the Ferrari analogy makes no sense. If the girl has a full bush in the picture and someone doesn't like a bush they should rate it low because they don't like that particular picture of the girl. If the same girl had another picture shaved maybe they would like it and rate it higher.

I rate about 7, the average vote so far is a 7 and that is 21.21% of the people who have voted so far... The system seems fine to me.

People like different girls, it's human nature.

Put in that perspective your logic seems right on the money. I've had to stare at my wife too long so I get a little excited when I see these kinda women... Another idea that seemed great while thinking about it but once put into play shows my stupidity. Seriously!! It's hard tryin to keep up with intelligent thinkers...

I guess it's that time again

http://whatboyswant.com/forum_read/4614213/1/100/Hot_or_Not_Babes_Section.html
http://whatboyswant.com/forum_read/4710183/1/100/Scoring_babes_on_this_site_what_is_most_important_to_you_for_a_high_score.html
http://whatboyswant.com/forum_read/4280835/1/100/get_real_with_ratings.html
http://whatboyswant.com/forum_read/3767095/1/100/Whats_up_with_you_assholes.html
http://whatboyswant.com/forum_read/3129449/1/100/To_those_that_vote_1.html

And of course the classic! (wtf is he saying?)
http://whatboyswant.com/forum_read/4060814/1/100/The_judgment_of_score_of_a_nude_woman.html

Quote:

Originally posted by HighGuy

I guess it's that time again

[ Link ]
[ Link ]
[ Link ]
[ Link ]
[ Link ]

And of course the classic! (wtf is he saying?)
[ Link ]

Well at least I can rest in the comfort of knowing I wasnt the first to come up with a bad idea....

As posted on http://whatboyswant.com/forum_read/4710183/1/20/Scoring_babes_on_this_site_what_is_most_important_to_you_for_a_high_score.html

My scale is something like this:

10 - Stunningly beautiful. Could go for years without ever seeing someone this good looking in person in real life.
9 - Gorgeous. Like the most beautiful women you might actually see in person, rarely but every so often.
8 - Beautiful. A girl like this would always turn your head and maybe elicit an exclamation (even if silently because you are with your girlfriend)
7 - Pretty. Way better than most females you might encounter.
6 - Nice looking. Better than the average woman you see.
5 - Average. About the same as the typical girl you see in the mall.
4 - Half Decent. Below average, but you would not be put off if you saw a woman like this for real.
3 - Ugly. No redeeming physical qualities, and you might look the other way if you saw her in person.
2 - Nasty. Offensive or off-putting in some way that would make you walk the other way if in her presence.
1 - Repulsive. Gross, disgusting and totally without redeeming quality to the point you might get sick if you saw her in person.

In addition to these base ratings, I add or subtract points for things I do like or don't like, such as body type, tattoos, piercings, make up, outfits, smoking, poses, etc. (No, I won't say which is which.) Sometimes I upgrade a score when there is something charming or alluring that just appeals to me, or downgrade when I get a bad vibe.

@Highguy:

Yeah, to be fair A LOT of people down vote chicks if they aren't naked, which is pretty stupid in my opinion.

But meh, it works...and everyone has a different opinion right.

Quote:

Originally posted by KJMDrum

Anyone else feel like too many pics( NOT MINE ) Get unfair ratings? Seems like a lot of hide in the shadows users like to vote 1's on pics that clearly dont deserve such a hideous rating. Especially prevelant in the Sexy Babes section....I've seen numerous pics of jaw dropping beautiful women there and they have a shit rating, either due to slam voting or just because their not nude. And we wont even get into those who like to trash ratings on pics just because they dont like the user....and I'm not talkin bout Mr. Wood!! Cant defend that at all. Just wanted to get other opinions on it............

Of course you are not talking about me. You are guilty of doing just what you are griping about to me. The comments are out there and I bet if someone was to care (ya right) they could check the votes and see the same. You are one of the last that should be complaining about this issue. Come on........people, look at this crap.

Now I do agree with the subject and I DO NOT do what he does, however I do also take into consideration the quality of the image along with the content.

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr wood

...
Of course you are not talking about me. You are guilty of doing just what you are griping about to me. The comments are out there and I bet if someone was to care (ya right) they could check the votes and see the same. You are one of the last that should be complaining about this issue. Come on........people, look at this crap.

Now I do agree with the subject and I DO NOT do what he does, however I do also take into consideration the quality of the image along with the content.

Of course, everything is about you, Mr. Wood.


Bottom line, people vote the way they see it, and there's no accounting for taste. So be it.
BTW, I kind of like hiproof's rating system.

Quote:

Originally posted by pdxal

...

Of course, everything is about you, Mr. Wood.


Bottom line, people vote the way they see it, and there's no accounting for taste. So be it.
BTW, I kind of like hiproof's rating system.

I will give you credit for not denying your guilt of doing what you are actually complaining about.
I suggest you follow a rating system to your liking and STOP doing what you set out to complain about.

This is an excellent thread, the only thing better would be removing the rating system away altogether, it is useless as most don't actually care what others think, like pdxal said they like what they like.

Wood...I do not vote on your material....I SKIP IT for this exact reason. I prefer to have no interaction with you as you are quite volitile in nature. There were some comments left on your pics by me early on but as I stated in my last comeent on your material I would and have not put any touches to your material since. You are antagonistic and I prefer to avoid you. Peace and well being to you...

Quote:

Originally posted by KJMDrum

Wood...I do not vote on your material....I SKIP IT for this exact reason. I prefer to have no interaction with you as you are quite volitile in nature. There were some comments left on your pics by me early on but as I stated in my last comeent on your material I would and have not put any touches to your material since. You are antagonistic and I prefer to avoid you. Peace and well being to you...

Your comments on my pictures were exactly the same as you call me but I too will treat you the same. Good luck to you....

BTW you brought me into this, you mentioned me in the opening post. I forgive you.

agree that it seems like people purposely rate low but what can you do opinions are like assholes eveyone has one

Quote:

Originally posted by Mr wood

This is an excellent thread, the only thing better would be removing the rating system away altogether, it is useless as most don't actually care what others think, like pdxal said they like what they like.

That's a terrible suggestion. The rating system works for the most part and it's far from "useless". It's an average of opinions and the majority give an honest opinion. The over raters and under raters get averaged out eventually because they vote the same on all pics good or bad. Without the rating system there would be no "top babes" section which is a great feature for finding a general selection of hot women instead of having to sort through all the uglies in the new uploads section. The rating system is not perfect but nothing is perfect, it's as good and as fair as it can be.

If peoples pics get a low rating then more then likely the pics deserve a low rating. If you want higher ratings upload better pics, people.

....and I'm not talkin bout Mr. Wood!! Cant defend that at all. Just wanted to get other opinions on it............ Originally posted by me at the opening of this thread!



Yes, I did say that, and heres why. I think that alot of the low ratings on your material are 70% created by your interaction with the other members of this site! In other words your material is paying the price for people's dislike of your personality. I had left some positive comments on some of your pics in the beginning but after seeing some of the ranting posts of yours, I went back and deleted all comments ( or at least all I could remember posting ) just so I did not have to deal with any grief...PERIOD!!! And even yet I see you post comments on other pix and its never related to the pic but rather another members comment. You are throwing gasoline on an already out of control blaze. I have never once said anywhere on here that you should quit posting your material, nor have I made any derrogatory remarks towards your material, I simply cant defend you given your own actions. I understand that these pix hold value to you and that it can be hurtful to see neg comments on them, hell..it stings when I get low ratings on my uploads too and there not even personal to me, but fact of the matter is that when you post here you are at the mercy of other users opinions and all have a right to vote or say what they feel within the parameters given by WBW rules and we as posters of the material must be willing to accept praise or critique in an equal manner. This is the long version of why I made the inital comment regarding you....in a nutshell its your actions not your material that I cant defend. good Day, Sir.