Users who's here to lower babes ratings

Quote:

Originally posted by Diz-X

You can put him om block and filter him in the babe categories filter. I really must make this more clear...

I can't find this feature. Can you point me in the right direction?

My ratings skew high because if a thumbnail doesn't look interesting to me, I don't click on it. I'm here to look at women I find attractive, not to criticize women I don't.

Quote:

Originally posted by PhilStevens

[reply=justmeee]

5 is acceptable
6 is good
7 is very good
7 favourite explains itself
8 -10 exceptional
Hope this explains.
N.B. this is supposed to be a porn site.[/reply]

what a goofy ass rating system

Maybe they don't know "1" is a troll and "10" is super hot?

OP 5 is average here with the ratings from 1 to 10. Most of these girls are average not 9 and 10s like you rate them. if all of them are rated at 9-10 then it means nothing to the ones that are truly a 9 or 10. I don't want to see some fat ass with her belly hanging to her knees are tits the same way. I have no need to see old ladies either. Flip me off in your picture I just think that's what you want to be rated. No need for pictures with dicks or guns in them either. I vote average on most because that's what they are. You vote your way and everyone else will vote their way. I also don't vote high on stupid pictures either but I do vote on the whole picture not just the girl. Don't like tattoos when over done or a bush that needs a mower to get to.

Quote:

Originally posted by gdi

OP 5 is average here with the ratings from 1 to 10. Most of these girls are average not 9 and 10s like you rate them. if all of them are rated at 9-10 then it means nothing to the ones that are truly a 9 or 10. I don't want to see some fat ass with her belly hanging to her knees are tits the same way. I have no need to see old ladies either. Flip me off in your picture I just think that's what you want to be rated. No need for pictures with dicks or guns in them either. I vote average on most because that's what they are. You vote your way and everyone else will vote their way. I also don't vote high on stupid pictures either but I do vote on the whole picture not just the girl. Don't like tattoos when over done or a bush that needs a mower to get to.

You have scored 9,797 girls with an average score of 3.42 and uploaded just 4. Therefore it is reasonable and rational to conclude that you consider the 4 ladies that you posted are a 10. I have looked through the 200 plus girls on your playlist (favourites) and again It's reasonable and rational to assume that you consider these ladies a 10. But, on reviewing the scores given to these ladies I can't find you giving a 10. I invite other members to review the 4 ladies' pictures that you have posted and score accordingly. In the interests of equity and fairness, I invite you to post a picture of a girl that you consider a 10. Then we'll all know where we're going wrong. Over to you!

I take the 1 - 10 rating as simple "would I fuck them" based only on what I see in the picture. Certain types automatically get very low ratings on my votes due to obvious issues with life. Prime examples are ink, odd piercings, bald cunny. I would be rare for me to vote these women above a 5. Maybe in a zombie apocalypse I'd fuck em, but otherwise they are a no-go since they are obviously not stable.
On the other side, I do agree with many of the users that state some road-kill have high ratings and it is certainly odd. On occasion some women have not been very attractive above the neck, but they look incredible otherwise so I give them a high rating based on photo situation and how sexy they are below the neck.

I rated this topic a 1.

The real problem WE ALL have become spoiled. I have 3 K of favorites from a database of millions. Simply Incredible! Score like we only have a few!

Quote:

Originally posted by PhilStevens

[reply=justmeee]

5 is acceptable
6 is good
7 is very good
7 favourite explains itself
8 -10 exceptional
Hope this explains.
N.B. this is supposed to be a porn site.[/reply]

I like the way you're thinking. I take the "1-to-10" scale as a bell-curve (there's a comedian named Jim Jefferies who has a routine about this type of rating.)

So, the vast majority of women (men too, I guess, but I'm not gay) are 4's to 6's. A "7" not only has a pretty face, but is "symmetrical" (not lop-sided) and has other features that are in proportion to her body. An "8" is beautiful! "9" is NEARLY flawless, maybe just some tiny issue, but very few women are 9's. (maybe 2 or 3%) and a "10"? Look as hard as you like, there's no improvements needed (or possible). Statistically, maybe 1% of women would be considered "10".

The other end of the scale works the same. There's got to be a few percent of women in the world who genuinely deserve a 1 or a 2. Very few people post pictures of women in the 1~4 categories, that's sad. "boys" might appreciate 7's and 8's more if they saw pictures of 3's and 4's. And truthfully, the 3's and 4's fuck just as good (and are a lot easier), but considering how much shit some of the people here dish-out, I can see why they don't often get posted.

What I DON'T do:
I seldom rate non-nudes or faceless/cropped genital pics. This is a "porn" site, not Vogue, not a medical textbook and NOT a swimsuit catalog. I sometimes make an exception when I can clearly identify a clothed picture (in a series) of a woman who ALSO appears naked, but otherwise, why the fuck waste any time reviewing pictures of fully-dressed (or faceless) women?

No bonus points for being "asian", or "young", or having huge tits. That all falls into the "eye-of-the-beholder" bullshit. Sure, everybody has their kinks, but there ACTUALLY IS such a thing as objective beauty, despite what all the hairy feminists would like you to believe.

No points deducted for having a stupid hair-cut, being shaved/not-shaved, tattooed, or pierced (or smoking). Those are all the results of her personality or the life she's led and I'm NOT here to rate her personality or give extra credit for having a hard life. How the hell would I know anyway?

Anyway, that's how I see it.

Quote:

Originally posted by Steve1311

Ok guys, I agree with elviswayne in that any girl who willingly shares the goods should be awarded with a kind “thank you”!

What fantasy world are you living in? Many of the pics posted here are not 'original content', willingly posted by the subject for your admiration. Many are from decades old porn archive sites, hacked or scavenged off of social media accounts, OnlyFans (or similar) premium accounts, involuntary 'creep shots', etc. Almost none of the girls in the pics are even aware this site exists (if they did, there'd probably be a whole raft of DMCA takedown requests filed), much less posting their own content on here.

If you think some girl is sitting by, breathlessly awaiting a high vote to rush and gratefully thank her white knight for expressing his/her admiration for her... I have some swamp land you might be interested in buying.

Quote:

Originally posted by ishavedmyballs4this

What fantasy world are you living in? Many of the pics posted here are not 'original content', willingly posted by the subject for your admiration. Many are from decades old porn archive sites, hacked or scavenged off of social media accounts, OnlyFans (or similar) premium accounts, involuntary 'creep shots', etc. Almost none of the girls in the pics are even aware this site exists (if they did, there'd probably be a whole raft of DMCA takedown requests filed), much less posting their own content on here.

If you think some girl is sitting by, breathlessly awaiting a high vote to rush and gratefully thank her white knight for expressing his/her admiration for her... I have some swamp land you might be interested in buying.

Not breathlessly waiting for her white knight. My white knight takes my pictures. But...

I post because I want to. Appreciation would be nice. High ratings are nice, average are, well, average. The occasional guy who gives a low score is entitled to his opinion.

But receiving "1"s repeatedly from the same guys, picture after picture is something else. These guys, a few of them mentioned in this thread, scroll through and give nothing but low scores. If all the women are so bad here, why do they keep coming back?

Why so difficult they are just pictures don't get mad of the low ratings of some pictures

Quote:

Originally posted by Dennis2377

Why so difficult they are just pictures don't get mad of the low ratings of some pictures

Because they are pictures of me.

Quote:

Originally posted by ellen84

Because they are pictures of me.

Nobody's perfect

Who the fuck cares

While I understand the angry simps down-rating pics and it pisses me off, that's their call. The average/mean will eventually work itself out. I personally rate them a 1 or a 10 as needed to help push them to where I think they should be. Actually, many of these photos are rated way above what one would normally suspect. Women in their 60s with scraggly bald pussies, wrinkled bodies and tits down to their belly buttons or women who are grossly obese should not be sporting an 8.73 lol. Also, this website is supposed to highlight "amateurs". As such, professional models and airbrushed pics (similar to many posted by justmeee) should be down-rated as well. With that said it's up to the persons doing the rating. "Banning" people cause they don't think like others think they should think is pretty much a cheap communist tactic.

I don't mean this as disrespectful in any way to the OP but I must say this and ask this question. Do you really have so much extra time in your life or do these random porn pics of "average" women really mean so much to you that you sit around thinking about what people are voting? And it actually affects your emotions to the point that you are now bitching about it on the internet?
Again, I'm not attacking you. Not trying to talk down to you. Just honestly curious. How can something so insignificant mean enough to you that you needed to have a conversation about it?

And it does kinda feel like you are saying that we all should vote a certain way or be gone. Surely whoever created and runs this site knew it would bring trolls that will strike a match just to watch stuff burn. That's how the internet works.
And, to give trolls credit, what they do works a lot of the time.
Let it roll off your shoulders man and never waste one second of your life worrying about anything that is out of your control. Because it's wasted energy that you could have used to change the world. Who knows.

IF IT'S OUT OF YOUR CONTROL AND NOTHING YOU DO WILL AFFECT THE OUTCOME IN ANY WAY, PUT IF OUT OF YOUR MIND AND NEVER WASTE TIME WORRYING ABOUT IT AGAIN. YOU WILL LIVE A MUCH FULLER LIFE OVERALL.

It’s sad to say but the trolls are hitting hard again. They are switching up the rankings 400 pounders as 10’s and beautiful women as 1’s. I truly feel bad for people like that they are turning away people who want to post quality and encouragement for lack there of. I’m friends with some women here that won’t post their beautiful natural bodies because of these kinds of people!!! Because of that they should be band. Furthermore there should be a limit of how many posts of an individual / model not the poster because that will also bring on hostility against that person / model. 3,000 posts of 1 person no matter how perfect pisses people off.