Lol, there is an on-going, questionable screening of the postable content. I would say, as a person that actually does graphics, and facial aesthetics for part of my profession, 50% of the submitted content that is rejected is done erroneously. Some amazing, real content is being rejected, and the listed reasons are 100% wrong. For instance, 90% of my recent uploaded content, I either took, or personally know the lady who it is of (i.e. she personally sent it to me). Sometimes the reason is listed as " poor quality", which isn't true, or "Model", which isn't true as I often took the photo myself. It's like, if the quality is too good, then it's rejected, if the quality is an older photgraph, or done with a cell phone, then it's rejected. Then there is a huge number of "other" - reasons listed to reject. These are just plan stupid, as they are great pics, and often go with the set - As I frequently upload sets of pics/vids. And, somehow, 4 pics of an obvious set are accepted, and 3 pics of same set of same lady are rejected - when they are obviously taken by the same camera, and by the same person, and often in the same setting - just look at the pics, it's not actually that difficult. I love how you have to use some "goggle focus" program to claim a pic or vid isn't real, when I took the goddamn photo myself - a month ago. Now, I do not use filters when I take a pic, but I'd say 75% of women taking selfies do, so that's tough, as many of the pics are real, but these ladies think filtering is ok - but they still go with the set of unfiltered that I have submitted at the same time (and the filtering usually affects the face more than anything, and that's a questionable attitude for rejecting as most care more about the body). I tend to not upload those pics, but it seems to be more difficult with the passing years to upload "flashing", or "selfie" pics of these ladies without someone rejecting them.
Now, if you need me to photshop the pics to improve your required quality, then you reject and say "photoshopped". This is also stupid, as the lower quality pics are actually more likely to be authentic, and the texting or app screen-shots are never, ever a reason to reject, as they are often legit, but off of snapchat or another program and are real, but the person is just trying to capture a pic that may be lost with time (like Snapchat clearing content). So, the quality of the pics should never, ever be an issue. A viewer can dislike a pic because of quality, but it is not a good reason to accept it's upload - this is a pure stupidity rejection reason. Seriously? It is both aesthetically, and practically pure stupidity to reject a pic, particulary a older pic due to quality. Pure stupidity. Seriously. No excuse, ever. It's for that very reason that ladies keep using filters and we have to photoshop pics before upload - because you have this narrow window of "goldilocks and the three bears" mentality - "this ones too good" vs "this ones just right", and you are failing, as you are currently accepting predominantly model and professional photos because you like the pretty, perfect lighting photo. .
There hundreds of pics and vids on the site I see all the time that are of "onlyfans", and professional vids, many times numerous copies of the same videos/pics, and somehow all of these well-known, professional models were accepted. Actually, seems like the majority of the top submitted pics and vids are "OnlyFans" these day - like the screening people or program can't tell the obvious difference. I could go through and tag them for you if you want.
I can many times, even tell you who the model is or what their pornhub, OnlyFans, or whatever call-sign was - and I am not on the porn sites too often, as these are old posts - from 10 years ago. If you can't do a better job at screening the pics/vids, then you should stop bothering to accept any pics/vids, or you should accept them all and let the members sort them out by letting them vote on rating, and other values like "authentic", "amateur", "professional", "photoshopped", "fake", and for god's sake make it easier to add tags. Make it more like Wikipedia to edit and make changes.
Otherwise, I won't be posting any more genuine content. I understand that it is likely an almost impossible job to screen them all, but perhaps you should try letting the members screen and accept - or reject by vote the content that is posted on the site. Right now, it appears you are getting it wrong 50% of the time or more. It's just a really, really poor, overall-strategy for the site. As if you obviously can't see the "big picture"
, lol.