Quote:
Originally posted by BillK
problem is, you made some ASSumption about who/what the "idiotcatcher" remark was directed at. Logical ASSumption would be that it's directed at the smartass directly above it.
I didn't make any assumption, because I don't care who it was directed towards. Good job on making an "ASSumption" (and why would you decide to cap "ASS"? I'm certain that we all learned in middle school that the word "assumption" contains the word "ass". Now, here is a mind-blower of a diddy that I learned a few years back: "When you assume, you make an 'ass' of 'u' and 'me'."
Quote:
Originally posted by BillK
Look, a guy started this thread with a legitimate question about why his pics were rejected, and all I'm sayin' is the answer he got is lame. "Pro-looking" pics are not automatically rejected.
Great, the answer he got was lame. But it applies to the majority of all threads about this issue. Most of the responses were from when there were no reference pics. And Latino addressed the issue, I looked at his pics and they look familiar to me. I probably would have let them through, maybe I wouldn't have, but its easy to see why they weren't.
And the majority of professional pics are rejected. Yes, a few get through. That's dandy, lets have you go through 23,000 pics a week and see how many you let through. I'd bet that there's going to be a few. But hey, at least there is the option for people who recognize the pic or model to report them.
Quote:
Originally posted by BillK
As for the comment I posted on the pic, I guess you can be as defensive as you want to be, but, as a matter of fact, there have been cases in the past when I DID report the pic, and, DAYS LATER, posted a comment on the pic with the model's web address, and the comment got removed almost immediately, but the pic remained!
The reported pics are not removed daily, Diz and one or two other mods are the only ones who review the reports, and since they are so busy "running the site" and all that it takes some time to get to them. The comments are handled by many mods, most of which can not remove the pics that the comments are associated with. That is why pics need to be reported, and not commented on.
Quote:
Originally posted by BillK
And hey, again, you can be as defensive as you want, but she sure has been around a long time for someone who is "not that popular."
I'm referencing the fact that the moderator apparently didn't recognize her, nor did I or apparently several other people. And she has been online for awhile, that's awesome, it doesn't mean that she is popular. The proliferation and fortitude of model sites, the majority of which contain nothing more than moderately attractive women attests to my assertion. Just because a site stays up for a few years does not dictate her acceptance into the internet hall of fame. One example would be Katie from Katie's World. She has had her site on the internet for awhile now, but nearly no one knows of her anymore. Another would be several of our previously contributing members. They had sites of their own, established for several years, and were unheard of by our members until they posted.
Quote:
Originally posted by BillK
And hey, as long as we're ranting, aren't the majority of comments around here a waste of time? Perhaps I';m not clear on the concept, but I thought we came here to entertain ourselves.
So how does entertaining yourself determine that comments are useless? If anything, comments further your enjoyment by promoting the posting and uploading of similar pics.
But, if comments are a waste of time, then aren't votes? Well hell, I guess posting in general is also a waste of time. Since everything is a waste of time, just how much have you wasted with your 976 comments and 57010 votes. And since we're we including posts, how much were your 1010 posts worth?
And wow, this thread has been taken off-topic.
* This post has been modified
: 18 years ago
