Quote:
Originally posted by kenpomaster20
...
Why do I HAVE to respond to all my posts?
Nobody said you had to. Nobody even insinuated it. She was just pointing out that it's hard to be exact when nobody knows what kind of pictures you're talking about.
Quote:
Originally posted by kpm20
I have a life outside the internet and don't constantly get on here like you do.
You really seem to care a lot about your internet porn site submissions for a guy who has such a happening off-line life. Seems like if you were out jet-setting and partying with rockstars until the early hours all the time you wouldn't give much of a crap if a website rejected some of your pictures.
Also, I'm not sure why you think (1) SP is on here all the time, and (2) that that's some sort of insult, or (3) that it has anything to do with what she said, which, again, was just that you hadn't provided any clarity as to the sorts of photos you were talking about in the first place.
Quote:
Originally posted by kpm20
Hence the 48 approved photos I have.
That doesn't even make sense. You have a robust life outside of WBW so that's why you have 48 pictures approved? Not sure why one necessarily follows the other, but, um..okay?
It also belies the claim you originally made that EVERY picture you uploaded was rejected. Very clearly every picture you've uploaded wasn't rejected. Someone was telling a fib, or being hyperbolic.
Quote:
Originally posted by thisguy
ALL these women were over the age of 22 when their photos were taken by me or they sent them to me via cell phone.
Okay, good for you. But here's the thing: When a moderator looks at that photo they have absolutely no idea where you got the picture from, nor do they know the age of the woman in the photo. They have to use their best judgement, and our guidelines are that we are to err on the side of caution. If a picture looks underage, we delete it. If a picture looks like a repost, we generally delete it. If a picture looks like a professionally shot, copyright picture, we delete it. If a picture has the looks of an edited picture, or a watermarked picture, we delete it.
Yes, this system isn't perfect. We all know this. There are over a million pictures in the galleries, and at least three times that many have been rejected--probably many more. No moderator can know every picture in the galleries, or every professional model on the internet, or the exact age of a woman they're looking at. But it's the best system we have, and it's how we've operated for the better part of the last decade. Sorry if this disappoints you, but these rules have been in effect since before you became a member, they've been in place as every one of the million-plus photos have been moderated and it's how it remains today.
And here's another thing; posters who upload stuff lie. They lie all the damn time. I can't tell you how many reposts and professional pictures we've had uploaded here by people who say that they took the pictures themselves. (Also another example: remember that guy who said every one of his pictures was deleted when he has 48 uploads in his gallery?) So we still have to do our best to judge whether or not a girl is underage, or do our due diligence in figuring out whether she's a professional model and the like. Basically, unless we have a photo ID of some sort we can't really be SURE of the age, regardless of what people say. If our doing the responsible thing and being cautious bothers you, again, sorry for you.
Quote:
Originally posted by kenpoomaster
Also, if you're referring to the one with small boobs, that's my ex-fiance and again, she was over the age of 22 at the time (23 to be exact).
Okay. That's a weird way to put it, but okay.
This information, however, is not available to our moderators or people who look at the pictures. Sugarpie was giving you her honest opinion as a former picture moderator, and an insight as to why your photos may have been deleted and how the process operates. You responded with facts that nobody but you could know.
Quote:
Originally posted by km20
She has small tits, size 34A if you must know.
Nobody asked, nor do most people care, I would surmise. In fact, you don't even know what photo SP was talking about, so maybe dial back the indignation a bit. Like completely.
Quote:
Originally posted by kenpofella
Just because a woman has small tits doesn't mean she's under 18.
Thanks for the tip. This information is completely new to everyone here.
You know Sugarpie is a real person (a woman, actually), who has actually seen other women?
Quote:
Originally posted by RageMan20
I've seen plenty of women well in to their 30s, even 40s with small tits.
Congratulations. You are a unique snowflake, as nobody else has ever seen small breasted women of various ages. Perhaps you could draw us a map leading to this mystical land inhabited by women of assorted ages and small chests! We would be eternally grateful!
Now, you might be sitting back saying to yourself, wow, that was kind of an uncalled for response. And you'd be right, I didn't have to reply that way. But it was warranted for a number of reasons, most prominently that you attacked and attempted to insult someone who was just trying to help you out. We strive to have a friendly community here and your response to Sugarpie was not in that tone, and uncalled for. The second reason I took the time to write this all out is because this is a topic that has been
brought up time,
and time,
and time,
and time again. (That was just a quick search, I can find more if you don't believe me) The responses are usually the same. Hundreds upon hundreds of words have been written on the topic, if you used the search function in the forum to look up your query before starting this thread you'd have noticed this.
So, basically, we're taking our time to answer questions that have been answered many times before, and members have gone out of their way to help you understand the process and you responded with vitriol and sanctimony. A friendly suggestion: don't do that in the future.
