Hi Guys
I like the idea of your site and I sure like nude babes, but damn... I really think you got a problem with child related porn.
I mean, were seeing girls posted that's not a day over 12 years old, and I find it pretty disgusting. It's the same people posting this crap, so why don't you delete the pictures and ban the people posting it?
post the link to the picture please.
I think some people got the term child porn wrong, a nude picture of a young girl isn't child porn. A picture of a young girl playing with herself or other erotic stuff is child porn.
We do everything to removed you girls, so you only have to post links. and we removed the pictures.
http://www.whatboyswant.com/showpicture/12119/
Diz-X - "I think some people got the term child porn wrong, a nude picture of a young girl isn't child porn. A picture of a young girl playing with herself or other erotic stuff is child porn."
I think what your saying is pretty imoral. I think a nude girl on 12 years posted on the internet is only posted there for one thing. Because the guy who posted it is turned on by it.
When I think about it, I can't find any reason to post the picture of for example, a bunch of kids on a scout camp, on a site containing nudity!
a naked kid is not child porn ! ! !
someone fucking a kid is childporn ! ! !
there is nothing wrong with a naked girl who is 16.
A naked 12 year old girl is not right
and if you see some we will delete them.
Meaby the law in Youre country is different from ours?
by the way there is nothing wrong with the pic wich link you posted.
Hmm.. Those girls are over 16, don't worry about that. And it's not pornograffic.
And if somebody is against child porn it's me, one of my beste girlfriends was abused on child age...
these chicks lost their virginity long time ago
a naked kid is not childporn. for instance yesterday, my uncle showed my pictures from his vacation with his wife and child. his child is a little girl, aged about 4 I think, and she was naked on those pictures too.
now some ppl might say that it's pretty obvious the little girl was naked because kids at a young age tend to undress themselves whenever they can, they hate clothes for some weird reason.
but when I tell you my uncle and his family went to a nudists-park, the situation becomes different. the pics of the little girl naked, were made because everybody there is naked. some ppl have different lifestyles then others and some of those lifestyles may offend you.
do, however, know that on WBW we are strongly against childporn and anything closely related to it! as Diz-x I know ppl who have been abused as a child aswell and it still makes my blood boil. but as far as I can tell, I have not seen any picture on WBW which is childporn or closely related to that. and those who have been found, have been deleted.
we like naked girls and naked women, not childporn.
Emilio:
If you don't like what you see, and if the moderators disagree with you...
Simply go away....
Just becasue a woman has small breasts does not mean they are underage!! Get this in your head. Also in the U.S. child nudity is not immediatly considered child porn. If the picture is sexually explicit then it is otherwise it can be classified as art. There is a fine line between the two, though, much of that depends on your morals.
In respons to Emilio's comment: What someone does with the picture does not change if it is child porn or not. What if some dude wants to beat off to a Piccaso or Restaurant menu? Does that make it porn? No, it stays the same. Just because someone gets off to it doesn't make the picture wrong. It may make the person wrong, but not the picture!!!
Hudad, real good explination!
RomeoFoxtrot 21 years ago
All I'm saying is that the girl in that pic looks underage. And on a site such as this, with sexual pics of adult women, to have that put in the mix can only lead to trouble. Seeing a picture of a nude, under age girl is not illegal, but why have one here at all?
Because maybe others' morals are not as strong as yours.
Loking at some of the girls on this site, ok some of them is underage and that is not right.. but you never can tell, and that is the problem....but saying that a girl under age showing her parts ant childporn comm on!!!!! we all now, that it is, but you cant see if the girl is 14 ar if she is 16... i dont now the selution, but i wood say, ther is a smoll bite of young girls on this site.... but who now the age?????????????
Just-C - "a naked kid is not childporn. for instance yesterday, my uncle showed my pictures from his vacation with his wife and child. his child is a little girl, aged about 4 I think, and she was naked on those pictures too.
now some ppl might say that it's pretty obvious the little girl was naked because kids at a young age tend to undress themselves whenever they can, they hate clothes for some weird reason. "
If your uncle has pictures of his own child naked there's nothing wrong with it, but if he upload's the picture on a website containing pornographic material it's different matter.
And I have to agree with Tonse.dk, you never know how old the girl is! That's the whole problem. We all know that girls these day's don't have to be 16 to look like a woman!
hudad - "Just because someone gets off to it doesn't make the picture wrong. It may make the person wrong, but not the picture!!!"
I understand what your saying, but that's not the point. A picture of a nude underage girl has nothing to do on a pornographic site, legal or illegal! If a picture attracts the wrong people then why leave it online?
