Bathing suit/bikini shots as photo filler

Just an observation. I look for my "nude/partial for the dollar" return. Unfortunately there seems too many page-after- of bikini shots.

IMHO quality (nudes) is better than filler.

And don't fall back on that "if you want nudes what have YOU submitted latly".

Convince me to otherwise to renew my Premium Membership.

Yep, it has been looking like the Sports Illustrated issues of late.

If they are naked of course it's better But if she is a super pretty uber babe . A 12 out of a 1 to 10 , An Angel face with the perfect stacked body and full legs I can easily undress her with my eyes. Problem ? Problem solved .

Quote:

Originally posted by heybooboo1

Yep, it has been looking like the Sports Illustrated issues of late.

Not to mention a 34% increase in the Premium Membership...~ $80 up to $120 USD...with LESS in return. Sounds like another Bidenomics "Shrinkflation" schemed failed excuse. We're not taking tubes of Pringles chips or ice cream cones here but hard earned $ for membership dollar.

Quote:

Originally posted by HornDogg61

Just an observation. I look for my "nude/partial for the dollar" return. Unfortunately there seems too many page-after- of bikini shots.

IMHO quality (nudes) is better than filler.

And don't fall back on that "if you want nudes what have YOU submitted latly".

Convince me to otherwise to renew my Premium Membership.

The reason you see filters in all the overviews on WBW (as shown in the attached screenshot) is to make it easier for you to view only what you want to see. I’m also exploring ways to improve this feature, but it requires a lot of time and research to figure out the best approach.

Quote:

Originally posted by HornDogg61

Not to mention a 34% increase in the Premium Membership...~ $80 up to $120 USD...with LESS in return. Sounds like another Bidenomics "Shrinkflation" schemed failed excuse. We're not taking tubes of Pringles chips or ice cream cones here but hard earned $ for membership dollar.

I haven't raised the premium membership prices for many years, as I’ve been covering the remaining costs out of my own pocket. Over the past year, I've been running WBW at a loss, I’ve reached a point where I can’t continue to do so. Energy, hosting, accountancy and maintenance costs have increased significantly here in the Netherlands in recent years. So, I had two options: shut down the site or increase prices.

I understand your frustration—I really do. Politicians have been damaging our economies and seem to not care with our struggles of hardworking people. I don’t want to delve too much into politics, as I’m a liberty-minded person who dislikes government overreach, and these days, you risk getting canceled just for having an unpopular opinion.

Quote:

Originally posted by HornDogg61

Convince me to otherwise to renew my Premium Membership.

well, you have access to Videos with premium. so what's your question?

Good stuff. I learned from this page how to filter out unwanted content. So, from this moment forward I won't have to look at stupid waste of time bikini babes. Thank you. I truly didn't know about the filters. Love it!

Quote:

Originally posted by heybooboo1

Good stuff. I learned from this page how to filter out unwanted content. So, from this moment forward I won't have to look at stupid waste of time bikini babes. Thank you. I truly didn't know about the filters. Love it!

I should make it more clear somehow, maybe add a page with explanation about filtering content.

Filtering should still be added to to the trending, so there is that.

I decided to as-needed "filtering bikini/bathing suit shots" as suggested.

Improvement in WAS immediately noted. BUT...

...it immediately highlighted the HUGE reduction in QUANTITY of Nude/partial Nude/more Hardcore was dramatically & noticeably much reduced from a decade or so ago (I been in and outta here that long). Yes, quantity and quality video has improved over the decades. The Wall St. Journal says no one gets rich DIRECTLY on the porn business...and to survive one must follow industry trends. I renewed my Premium Membership for ONE additional year to gauge how the the industry and WBW goes.

Quote:

Originally posted by HornDogg61

I decided to as-needed "filtering bikini/bathing suit shots" as suggested.

Improvement in WAS immediately noted. immediately highlighted the HUGE reduction in QUANTITY of Nude/partial Nude/more Hardcore was dramatically & noticeably much reduced from a decade or so ago (I been in and outta here that long). Yes, quantity and quality video has improved over the decades. The Wall St. Journal says no one gets rich DIRECTLY on the porn business...and to survive one must follow industry trends. I renewed my Premium Membership for ONE additional year to gauge how the the industry and WBW goes.

Thank you so much for the support! I really appreciate it! If you have suggestions for ways to make things better, I am always open to make it happen.

I think that the filter is a fantastic thing. people are always complaining about seeing things they don't like, this will stop all that. though I could never understand why people would even bother looking at things they don't like instead of just skipping them.

The part of the filter that doesn't work, is that there are plenty of quality nudes that are marked as "beach and bikini babes". IMHO, its better to use the HIDE button when you see an account that just spams bikini/instagram pics. Some of those users have multiple accounts, so its pretty easy to block/hide those accounts since you know what they are about. I also hide the creeper/hidden cam pic accounts. Not a fan of those pics either.

Quote:

Originally posted by lucashoodz

The part of the filter that doesn't work, is that there are plenty of quality nudes that are marked as "beach and bikini babes". IMHO, its better to use the HIDE button when you see an account that just spams bikini/instagram pics. Some of those users have multiple accounts, so its pretty easy to block/hide those accounts since you know what they are about. I also hide the creeper/hidden cam pic accounts. Not a fan of those pics either.

Back in the day we had NSFW filters and this was easier. I am looking into how to identify nude vs non nude images. I could use AI for this, to scan all images on the side and classified nudity vs non-nudity. This will help filter non nude content or other way around in the filters.

@lucashoodz

What do you think of a this filter "show only NSFW" (See screenshot at this post):

Now THAT is an excellent filter. With that in place I can go ahead an unhide users as it sucks cause if a user uploads IG pics (not my preference), they still may have a decent forum contribution and I currently cannot see their posts.

Thanks Diz!

Currently running a script that uses AI to tag NSFW images. Do not know how long this will take, it's a slow process and its about 3 mil pictures. I will be putting it online for ASAP, only need to test it a bit more to make sure everything works as expected.

Maybe I can use AI too for tagging images easier, but have to look into what kind of AI models are available for this.

Could this be used to filter out pros, pre submission? If you began a database of pros that have been identified by mods or users with a verified link to their OF, IAFD or website, could that be used to cut down on the amount of times that pros get upped? Sort of in the same way previously uploaded photos get flagged?

Quote:

Originally posted by lucashoodz

Could this be used to filter out pros, pre submission? If you began a database of pros that have been identified by mods or users with a verified link to their OF, IAFD or website, could that be used to cut down on the amount of times that pros get upped? Sort of in the same way previously uploaded photos get flagged?

The professionals flagged through the report function are hashed and automatically blocked during upload. This system uses visual hashes, meaning even if the image is resized, it will still be denied.

I had considered using facial recognition to help filter professional models, but I haven't had the time or resources to pursue it. One challenge is the lookup time in a relational database, and I don't have the bandwidth or funding to research faster storage solutions with optimized indexing for these visual hashes.

As for NSFW detection, there are several pre-trained models available online. I'm currently using the NudeNet model to distinguish between SFW and NSFW content, which I set up in an evening during my free time.

An update on the estimated time to process all images through the NSFW detection script: it will take approximately 18 days. However, I can add the filter much sooner since I prioritized the most recent uploads first.