Alphan you are talking to a guy who has been into graphic design and photography for over 6 years. I know what I'm talking about.
Quote:
Originally posted by alphan
Take notice that the two separate photos were taken at different angles and lighting.
Regardless of COLORED lighting, there is no difference made by the natural or standard lighting affecting the subject of the photo. Light does not make freckles or nipples change in an opposite contrast to the rest of the body. You can ask any photographer. Freckles don't disappear because of lighting or angles.
Quote:
Originally posted by alphan
With her camera, it is entirely possible that the freckles may show in this photo, but not show in the other photo.
Really? Because that'd be a magical camera if I ever saw. Cameras take exact shots of what the film is exposed to. If I take a picture of a phone handset directly facing it. Then tilt it to a >90 degree angle, do those numbers and print on the phone disappear? No, they don't. The only chance of the freckles disappearing would be if the subject was at a more noticeable distance or in a completely different position.
Quote:
Originally posted by alphan
As far as the nipples, they all look the same to me. The nipples in one photo may seem bigger and pointed, it is cold in New Jersey today.
If you can't see the difference in the areolas and nipples, you shouldn't be trying to correct others. They are obviously two different tones. One is near invisible, the other is more defined and far darker. The nipple size is also a major difference. When nipples get cold they elongate, not enlarge in circumference in such a dramatic fashion. I know what temperature does to the human body.
Quote:
Originally posted by alphan
You don't see the breasts sagging in the other photo because the angle was different.
Do you understand the concepts of gravity? Gravity is constantly pulling down, unless she was at near state of laying on her back, there still would of been noticeable saggage. Moving a girl's angle relative to the floor does not suddenly alter a girl's breast composition or center of gravity.
Quote:
Originally posted by alphan
The abs area is different because she has her arm covering it in one photo, but, not in the other.
So you claim that by positioning your forearm in front of your stomach suddenly it will flatten? Amazing! Quick we better inform the entire porn industry, fashion industry, and model industry. Did you consider the depth, the composition, and the spatial differences of the forearm and the stomach? I'm pretty sure you didn't.
Quote:
Originally posted by alphan
You could not really see her arm in picture 1.
Ummm, then you need your eyes checked. On the left picture you have an almost certain length of the upper arm. As you seem to overlook, is that comparatively to the under area breast the arm is a good 4 to 5 cm difference. In the other picture, her arm is near parallel to her breast, which if anything would give additional difference in position. But guess what? There isn't. In fact its an almost exact opposite, the elbow is too high and the forearm requires a downward angle to make it clear past the breast.
Quote:
Originally posted by alphan
Hence, you cannot really justify the difference in arm length.
Maybe if you have no conception or value of spatial differences.
* This post has been modified
: 19 years ago