dam you fucking hot
- Goto:
- Go
[Deleted] 15 years ago
Sorry about the shite picture quality on #2 but you can still see a completely different nose...
* This post has been modified
: 15 years ago
[Deleted] 15 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by joeropes
hm, she still gets me hard!! great tits and pussy!
Whoever she may be...
HedonisticMind 15 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by ItsaPinkMoon
silly woman. silly men.
... silly generalization
[Deleted] 15 years ago
I guess a few people are still hoping 'michelle' is at least ONE of these women and will post some more. I'm less optimistic.
daytona1990 15 years ago
Yeah. I see a varying difference between the pics on page 1 and the nudes that followed. The difference is with the heaviness on the body, size of legs, shape of hips and waists, and face.
HOCKEYNPUSSY 15 years ago
Shit, I don't cum her for a few weeks and this woman drops in. WOW.
I don't care if there is proof that these pics are of her or just some randon woman. She's got a rockin bod. lucky husband. Michelle, you look familiar. are you from LA?
I don't care if there is proof that these pics are of her or just some randon woman. She's got a rockin bod. lucky husband. Michelle, you look familiar. are you from LA?
[Deleted] 15 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by HOCKEYNPUSSY
I don't care if there is proof that these pics are of her or just some randon woman. She's got a rockin bod. lucky husband. Michelle, you look familiar. are you from LA?
I agree the woman in the second lot of pics is very attractive, and I can only hope this is indeed, 'Michelle', but I have a strong suspicion that it's not. Why would she post two sets of two different women and claim to be both? I can;t understand it but I really, really hope that she'll post more and explain that I'm wrong etc, because those tits are great.
- Goto:
- Go