Proof of identity

All doubts have now diminished i hope... Thanks

hey Sandra, nice pics

i never doubted you, even if your a triple double poster
and you are very hot by the way.

cute thanks for posting

hmm the link is dead for me.

I just tried it and it worked. Hmm...weird.

i'm not much on nipple rings, but i'd hit ya anyway.

thanks

nah still don't believ you sandra, i bet you photoshopped that sign

The only way you will convince me is to personally visit my house and let me take pictures myself

Quote:

Originally posted by TickLer

nah still don't believ you sandra, i bet you photoshopped that sign

The only way you will convince me is to personally visit my house and let me take pictures myself

Shame on all of you that ever doubted her. Great pic...can't wait to see more. Chuck will be proud...wherever he may be...

you're hot....

Do you now or have you ever snorted coke?

i wish people would keep on topic! ^^^








thanks for sharing sandra :

Quote:

Originally posted by Watty

i wish people would keep on topic! ^^^








thanks for sharing sandra :

That is some funny shit watty, Love the pics btw

Quote:

Originally posted by Watty

i wish people would keep on topic! ^^^








thanks for sharing sandra :

Ok well I didn't doubt you originally but after seeing that pic i have to. How could you conclude that that picture satisfies as evidence that she or he is really 'Sandra'? Yes there is a message on display, however that message could easily have been made by the individual in question, photographed and then put on top of the original picture, WHICH would explain why 'sandra' is not properley holding the message, and explains why it is simply lying on her lap as photoshopping an image of a person holding a message properley with both hands is a lot harder to do. I call FAKE until more conclusive evidence emerges.



Also after looking at other pics it seems dubious as to whether you are actually sandra. For instance you were asked by axonmania to post a pic of your breasts, which you dutifully did. The pic you posted however (above) was not a new pic however as anyone can see from looking at the date written across the top of the image which indicates it was taken some time in 2003. It therefore appears likely that you have merely taken that image from the internet and rather noobishly failed to notice that the picture is 2 years old. Of course i could be wrong and you could in fact be this person called sandra. If so prove me wrong with evidence which is less disputable.

http://www.pinkclouds.com/tgp/pc1115/1115.html
http://www.sandropoly.johan.de/cms/userinfo.php?uid=7

Evidence shows Sandra and the person claiming to be Sandra both use the same email address. However I still dispute whether this person is Sandra, it is probably just some web designer in charge of her website trying to get free advertisement.

i keep it short and sweet after the last post....

nice

Quote:

Originally posted by sweetfree

Ok well I didn't doubt you originally but after seeing that pic i have to. How could you conclude that that picture satisfies as evidence that she or he is really 'Sandra'? Yes there is a message on display, however that message could easily have been made by the individual in question, photographed and then put on top of the original picture, WHICH would explain why 'sandra' is not properley holding the message, and explains why it is simply lying on her lap as photoshopping an image of a person holding a message properley with both hands is a lot harder to do. I call FAKE until more conclusive evidence emerges.



Also after looking at other pics it seems dubious as to whether you are actually sandra. For instance you were asked by axonmania to post a pic of your breasts, which you dutifully did. The pic you posted however (above) was not a new pic however as anyone can see from looking at the date written across the top of the image which indicates it was taken some time in 2003. It therefore appears likely that you have merely taken that image from the internet and rather noobishly failed to notice that the picture is 2 years old. Of course i could be wrong and you could in fact be this person called sandra. If so prove me wrong with evidence which is less disputable.

Another issue is your email address. The one posted on this site is sweetheart-sandra@gmx.net, however the REAL sandra has the email address sweetheart-sandra@gmx.de. http://www.online-casting.com/show/show3/sandra.htm. So if you are the real sandra, why the difference in email?

dammit man who cares..
boobs is all we care for

in that case, happy birthday http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&rls=SNYG,SNYG:2004-46,SNYG:en&q=boobs&sa=N&tab=wi

sweetfree- to be honest with you

none gives a shit.

thank you 4 yor attention

Quote:

Originally posted by sweetfree

Ok well I didn't doubt you originally but after seeing that pic i have to. How could you conclude that that picture satisfies as evidence that she or he is really 'Sandra'? Yes there is a message on display, however that message could easily have been made by the individual in question, photographed and then put on top of the original picture, WHICH would explain why 'sandra' is not properley holding the message, and explains why it is simply lying on her lap as photoshopping an image of a person holding a message properley with both hands is a lot harder to do. I call FAKE until more conclusive evidence emerges.



Also after looking at other pics it seems dubious as to whether you are actually sandra. For instance you were asked by axonmania to post a pic of your breasts, which you dutifully did. The pic you posted however (above) was not a new pic however as anyone can see from looking at the date written across the top of the image which indicates it was taken some time in 2003. It therefore appears likely that you have merely taken that image from the internet and rather noobishly failed to notice that the picture is 2 years old. Of course i could be wrong and you could in fact be this person called sandra. If so prove me wrong with evidence which is less disputable.

http://www.pinkclouds.com/tgp/pc1115/1115.html
http://www.sandropoly.johan.de/cms/userinfo.php?uid=7

Evidence shows Sandra and the person claiming to be Sandra both use the same email address. However I still dispute whether this person is Sandra, it is probably just some web designer in charge of her website trying to get free advertisement.

I call that good detective work.