Nude Sports

Quote:

Originally posted by Knobstock

I frankly don't understand all this uptightedness with women who "look" like they're very young. Now, I'm absolutely not advocating the publication of underage girls, but isn't "looking younger" part of the appeal in our society? It goes both ways. All the time I see very young women who appear to be much older than they actually are (I'm sure that some have slipped through here) but also there are those who look younger. In fact, I've known women who spent a lifetime dressing and talking like a teenager.

The truth is anyone who visits this particular website needs to have an open mind and have a degree of trust in the contributors. Some things here are wonderful and stimulating; some things appeal to almost no one. It's part of he deal.

quote = jenngurl23
no its not "proof" but what MOST are is wishful thinking by guys telling themselves oh there is no proof or they just LOOK younger a little or something. fact is MOST girls at least physically look older by a fair bit then they are nowadays the difference is in facial maturity most times and a lot of those girls look 15 to 17, maybe 18 but whatever its not my say and i'm not going to go around reporting a bunch of pics i just wish the uploader wouldn't post questionable ones in the first place, especially since most (NOT all, just most) times there is a question, it's for good reason.
quote end

And i would like to add, that if a pic of a girl with a suggested age of 18, but looks like a 14 year old, turns you on... you should seek help.

Great Posts
Five

nice thread. I like athletic chicks.

Quote:

Originally posted by sigmer

...

And i would like to add, that if a pic of a girl with a suggested age of 18, but looks like a 14 year old, turns you on... you should seek help.

That was my point, isn't it? But still, just because a woman looks young, let's not panic.

Quote:

Originally posted by Knobstock

...

That was my point, isn't it? But still, just because a woman looks young, let's not panic.

I think just the slightest doubt about her age if shes over 18 or not. should be enough not to post the picture...

And that was all I was interested in in posting the original question. I have been impressed with the efforts that most posters here seem to go to to ensure that all models/amateurs are of age, as it should be. Frankly, I am not interested in making judgements about others' turn-ons, though I may not approve of some. My question arose because I work with swimmers a lot and the "movement" in the pic in question looks like a lot of roughly 12 y/o's I have seen, especially the second from the top...and that was what probably caught my eye and raised the question. Regarding some other points raised here: I have seen 13 y/o's, a lot of them, that I assumed were driving already, and more, while some 19-20 y/o's look much younger, but movements don't seem to lie too much. Even well-trained younger athletes still show some stiffness, lack of real grace, that older athletes show. But I am done justifying and explaining now. Just raised the original question in case the poster might have been a little hasty, that's all.

I'm not judging anyone's tastes. Some of us prefer the "sweet, innocent" look. Whatever. Each to their own.

That said, this is a porn site. We're all here for one reason - to look at girls. THIS is where the issue of age comes in. This is a classy site and community that people can come to for "good, clean, adult entertainment."

The issues I have with girls who "look too young" is that it can taint that image.

The community members and staff members here work very hard to make sure the reputation of WBW stays high, and that although it's a porn site, it's a clean porn site that does things right and is here solely for the appreciation of beautiful images of beautiful women.

The fact that they work very hard to avoid copyright infringement, anything that is remotely illegal, anything that's remotely under-aged, anything that's remotely private information...

Those things lend to the credibility of the community. It's the difference between a "strip club" where you can get blowjobs in the back for 20 bucks, and a "gentleman's club" where respectable men often meet to discuss business or hang out.

They're worlds apart. They both market the same things - attractive women. But at the end of the day there's a disting difference between a dive where the girls are doing more than dancing, and that really exclusive club that people go to for good, clean fun.

I'm rambling, and maybe I'm not articulating it well... But I guess what I'm saying is that when in doubt, it should be removed. WBW has a wonderful reputation and I like being considered part of the community. I'm proud to be a member because of the ethics the site and community has.

That's not worth jeopardizing over one picture of a girl, regardless of how cute she may be.

I did not catch the picture that is causing all the debate when I uploading the pictures. There were several others that as I posted them I rethought posting them because of the possible perception of age being an issue. Thank you for pointing it out and I have removed it from the post.

Thanks, Kinky. Personally, I didn't notice whichever pic they were talking about either. I never saw it.

Anyone for sport fuckin