Nothing, but facials

Are pictures like these *really* pornography? There is no nudity, not even provocative dress or posture in some of them. There is certainly an *implication* of obscenity, but is sperm obscene; if that is in fact what is so liberally distributed upon these receptive visages? It could be anything, and in many cases it is fake or "photoshopped". Would a picture of a blot of bodily fluid on it's own be considered obscene or pornographic? Please philosophize.... while you peruse these chum-strung honies.

And more un-porn:

Quote:

Originally posted by rumjunkie

Are pictures like these *really* pornography?

Not all of them. I consider them more fetish photos than true pornography. Especially the ones where the girl is fully clothed and has cum in her hair or on her clothes or face. Kind of like the pics of women in the neck to calf ,full length, tight fitting leather dresses. There is something titillating about them but they aren't really pornography.

Straying a bit off the original topic. Should be a new thread called "is it porn?"...

WOW...

/pics

I keep getting docked credits, so I am taking my un-porn and going home.