Quote:
Originally posted by Daggett
Edit: on a side but related note, on roids why does a guys package get smaller,
It doesn't. If you fail to take the appropriate ancillaries (e.g., HCG) your nuts will shrink because exogenous T etc. shuts down your natty T production. Not only does your package not shrink, but if you are on a good stack you have wood nearly all the time and hump like a 16 year old. I am on a test prop, tren, masteron, eq stack at the moment and it is awesome - and no, these girls do not scare me

. Let me assure you - if the public was widely aware of the benefits of most steroids and of the lie behind nearly all of the supposed side effects they'd be clamoring for them to be covered by their health plan. And this stuff is expensive enough that this is what scares the pols and the board rooms.
These chicks only look like these photos at contest time, or when they shred for a photo shoot whatever. These particular babes are not that big - they are not female BBs (who pretty much do look like guys to me) but they are more in the fitness class.
I do not personally think a chick looks attractive when they are highly vascular like they are when they are cut for contest, but guess what: they are intense, devoted and committed athletes who are not engaging in their sport to attract either me or you any more than a tri-athlete, a runner, a swimmer etc. engages in her sport to be sexy for you. So why the photos? Well simply put the sport is expensive and it does not pay.
* This post has been modified
: 18 years ago