[RAQ] Random Selfies to Enjoy!
Starter: [Deleted] Posted: 8 years ago Views: 42.5K
- Goto:
- Go
[Deleted] 8 years ago
[Deleted] 8 years ago
meatman6, [Deleted], robert98597, Hican and 4 other(s) find this awesome.
[Deleted] 8 years ago
meatman6, [Deleted], robert98597, Hugeez and 5 other(s) find this awesome.
[Deleted] 8 years ago
meatman6, [Deleted], Kaitsu1970, robert98597 and 6 other(s) find this awesome.
[Deleted] 8 years ago
[Deleted], robert98597, Hugeez, Hican and 5 other(s) find this awesome.
cockylad 8 years ago
amazing collection of selfies ,love the girl doing her arse with the glass dildo
robert98597, captnenglish find this awesome.
Moaña 8 years ago
vegas365, johnsnow, loveboobs69, robert98597 and 6 other(s) find this awesome.
cockylad 8 years ago
the selfie is an art form these girls must practice for ages ,the poses are amazing and imaginative,still love the girl dildoing her arse
jenngurl23 8 years ago
Sooooooo many of these are UA. How are mods okay with a) deleted 7+ at a time and not stopping user from posting b) leaving lots that are still obviously girls, not women...
Come on guys...
Come on guys...
F1098 finds this awesome.
omuh 8 years ago
Quote:
Originally posted by jenngurl23Sooooooo many of these are UA. How are mods okay with a) deleted 7+ at a time and not stopping user from posting b) leaving lots that are still obviously girls, not women...
Come on guys...
When I went through the tread the content had already been posted so can't go back in time and stop the user.
If you feel some are still here, feel free to report them. I have a pretty strict view on UA content and am pretty confident the thread is mostly cleared from those.
captnenglish finds this awesome.
Knobstock 8 years ago
I have watched this apparent effort to keep photos of underaged girls off this site for years with amusement. OK, I get it: we don't want to promote sexual behavior toward girls who are under the arbitrary age of 18. I'm in favor of subjectively deleting posts that appear to exploit children. That's tough to do, given that the "ideal" body is often represented by a girl who is barely of age. That task is further complicated by the tendency for young women to work every possible trick (makeup, etc) to look older, and the same effort by women beginning to lose their perkiness doing what they can to look underage.
But, don't pretend you're eliminating underage models. The only way to be sure of a person's age is to identify her, so that means WBW should never, ever post a photo that does not show a face.
I know this comment will set off all sorts of alarm bells, but I thought it needed to be said.
But, don't pretend you're eliminating underage models. The only way to be sure of a person's age is to identify her, so that means WBW should never, ever post a photo that does not show a face.
I know this comment will set off all sorts of alarm bells, but I thought it needed to be said.
* This post has been modified
: 8 years ago
omuh 8 years ago
Your point is valid. No-face shots are even harder to judge indeed but pics often come in series so we can at least see a face or another angle on the body to judge the age of the model. Other times, it's just obvious, based on what we can see, that the girl isn't young.
Not saying I'm 100% sure there's no UA girl in there because it's impossible to know for sure unless we can identify everyone, as you said. But we still try to remove everything that may look UA; and I've deleted pictures that don't show a face as UA too.
We could also bring the argument that any picture could be the result of revenge-porn which is illegal too. In the end, it's a matter of trying to find the best balance between no-content and illegal content. So far, we've always been on the side of having less content than hosting illegal content by deleting everything that is questionable, even if it may not be illegal.
Not saying I'm 100% sure there's no UA girl in there because it's impossible to know for sure unless we can identify everyone, as you said. But we still try to remove everything that may look UA; and I've deleted pictures that don't show a face as UA too.
We could also bring the argument that any picture could be the result of revenge-porn which is illegal too. In the end, it's a matter of trying to find the best balance between no-content and illegal content. So far, we've always been on the side of having less content than hosting illegal content by deleting everything that is questionable, even if it may not be illegal.
MaxQuad 8 years ago
Moaña 8 years ago
Hican, robert98597, cockylad, vegas365 and 1 other(s) find this awesome.
Moaña 8 years ago
Hican, loveboobs69, robert98597, cockylad and 1 other(s) find this awesome.
Moaña 8 years ago
[Deleted], meatman6, robert98597, canadian17 and 4 other(s) find this awesome.
cockylad 8 years ago
159 is four fit girls specially the 4th what a stunner what a body
robert98597, symplmnd, bangermash find this awesome.
- Goto:
- Go