Who would you do first?
-
Lindsay
48.72% (210)
-
Britney
31.55% (136)
-
Paris
11.37% (49)
-
I'd chop off my chonson before doing any of them.
8.35% (36)
Votes:
431
Your choices are: Britney Spears, Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan.
The question is: Using their present day looks and persona, which one would you do first?
I’ll present the evidence for and against each, and you can take it from there.
Paris:
Pros – She’s probably the richest of the three. Her body isn’t currently sloppy, as is Britney’s, although she does kind of look like a praying mantis. We’ve seen her completely naked, because of her sex tape.
Cons – We’ve seen her sex tape, and, quite frankly, she sucks, and not in a good way. She also has the herp – not rumored like everyone else in hollyweird, but you know, confirmed (see photos below). I’m also pretty sure she’s the dumbest broad on this list, which is quite an achievement.
Recent pics:
Britney:
Pros – Well, you know she likes to sex. You can tell from her two kids. Also, her first husband, that Jason Alexander dude (this one, not this one) spilled the beans about how Britney let her freak flag fly during their Vegas vacation. She doesn’t like bras. Or panties. She’s got the biggest terts of the three, I think. Maybe. She’ll buy you all kinds of crazy shit – I think at some point K-fed had a Ferrari. Which is nice.
Cons – She is batshit insane. She’s liable to shave her head and stab you with an umbrella. She’s so insane, in fact, that her dad has to watch over her 24/7. She also has two Federkids, which means that if you’re fucking her, Tater Tot or Small Fry might come toddling into the room, and that’s just awkward.
Recent pics:
Lindsay:
Pros – Lindsay, like Britney, is, by all accounts, a sex fiend. Additionally, they’re both into the female-on-female action, of which Lindros approves. Further, she’s shown her terts in a couple photoshoots, and they’re not too shabby. She’s also shown her clam-a-lam-a-ding-dong a few times with mixed results. Once it looked kinda decent (when she was getting off the boat) and another time it looked like ABC bubble-gum, which is not so nice. She also has daddy issues, and while some of you might consider this a negative, you’re wrong, because chicks who are weird in the head because of daddy issues are fucktons of fun in the bed. Sure, they’re crazy, but I didn’t ask which one of these chicks you’d want taking your SATs for you.
Cons – She seems a little bit, um, unstable. She’s a drug-addicted broad, sometimes looks anorexic, and, currently doesn’t seem to be sexing men. Although that’s not gonna last. Trust me on this one. She has a penis need; you can see it in her eyes. She has seemingly run through all her money - so don't count on any Britney-style Ferraris. Also, she has lots of freckles. Too many, I say. Finally, you might have to deal with her trollop of a mother, since she seems to live her life vicariously through her train-wreck daughter, and that might be a deal breaker for me.
Recent pics:
So, the choice is yours. Choose wisely.
The question is: Using their present day looks and persona, which one would you do first?
I’ll present the evidence for and against each, and you can take it from there.
Paris:
Pros – She’s probably the richest of the three. Her body isn’t currently sloppy, as is Britney’s, although she does kind of look like a praying mantis. We’ve seen her completely naked, because of her sex tape.
Cons – We’ve seen her sex tape, and, quite frankly, she sucks, and not in a good way. She also has the herp – not rumored like everyone else in hollyweird, but you know, confirmed (see photos below). I’m also pretty sure she’s the dumbest broad on this list, which is quite an achievement.
Recent pics:
Britney:
Pros – Well, you know she likes to sex. You can tell from her two kids. Also, her first husband, that Jason Alexander dude (this one, not this one) spilled the beans about how Britney let her freak flag fly during their Vegas vacation. She doesn’t like bras. Or panties. She’s got the biggest terts of the three, I think. Maybe. She’ll buy you all kinds of crazy shit – I think at some point K-fed had a Ferrari. Which is nice.
Cons – She is batshit insane. She’s liable to shave her head and stab you with an umbrella. She’s so insane, in fact, that her dad has to watch over her 24/7. She also has two Federkids, which means that if you’re fucking her, Tater Tot or Small Fry might come toddling into the room, and that’s just awkward.
Recent pics:
Lindsay:
Pros – Lindsay, like Britney, is, by all accounts, a sex fiend. Additionally, they’re both into the female-on-female action, of which Lindros approves. Further, she’s shown her terts in a couple photoshoots, and they’re not too shabby. She’s also shown her clam-a-lam-a-ding-dong a few times with mixed results. Once it looked kinda decent (when she was getting off the boat) and another time it looked like ABC bubble-gum, which is not so nice. She also has daddy issues, and while some of you might consider this a negative, you’re wrong, because chicks who are weird in the head because of daddy issues are fucktons of fun in the bed. Sure, they’re crazy, but I didn’t ask which one of these chicks you’d want taking your SATs for you.
Cons – She seems a little bit, um, unstable. She’s a drug-addicted broad, sometimes looks anorexic, and, currently doesn’t seem to be sexing men. Although that’s not gonna last. Trust me on this one. She has a penis need; you can see it in her eyes. She has seemingly run through all her money - so don't count on any Britney-style Ferraris. Also, she has lots of freckles. Too many, I say. Finally, you might have to deal with her trollop of a mother, since she seems to live her life vicariously through her train-wreck daughter, and that might be a deal breaker for me.
Recent pics:
So, the choice is yours. Choose wisely.
* This post has been modified
: 14 years ago